Comprehensive Analysis of the Human SH3 Domain Family Reveals a Wide Variety of Non-canonical Specificities.

[1]  A. Cámara-Artigas,et al.  The role of water molecules in the binding of class I and II peptides to the SH3 domain of the Fyn tyrosine kinase. , 2016, Acta crystallographica. Section F, Structural biology communications.

[2]  S. Li,et al.  Large-Scale Screening of Preferred Interactions of Human Src Homology-3 (SH3) Domains Using Native Target Proteins as Affinity Ligands* , 2016, Molecular & Cellular Proteomics.

[3]  S. Marqusee,et al.  When the Scaffold Cannot Be Ignored: The Role of the Hydrophobic Core in Ligand Binding and Specificity. , 2015, Journal of molecular biology.

[4]  S. Knapp,et al.  Differential Recognition Preferences of the Three Src Homology 3 (SH3) Domains from the Adaptor CD2-associated Protein (CD2AP) and Direct Association with Ras and Rab Interactor 3 (RIN3)* , 2015, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[5]  C. Quince,et al.  Insight into biases and sequencing errors for amplicon sequencing with the Illumina MiSeq platform , 2015, Nucleic acids research.

[6]  Hai Fang,et al.  The SUPERFAMILY 1.75 database in 2014: a doubling of data , 2014, Nucleic Acids Res..

[7]  D. Gfeller,et al.  A structural portrait of the PDZ domain family. , 2014, Journal of molecular biology.

[8]  Peer Bork,et al.  SMART: recent updates, new developments and status in 2015 , 2014, Nucleic Acids Res..

[9]  Q. Gong,et al.  Structural investigation of the interaction between the tandem SH3 domains of c-Cbl-associated protein and vinculin. , 2014, Journal of structural biology.

[10]  W. Schubert,et al.  Structural details of human tuba recruitment by InlC of Listeria monocytogenes elucidate bacterial cell-cell spreading. , 2014, Structure.

[11]  Dongfang Liu.  The adaptor protein Crk in immune response , 2014, Immunology and cell biology.

[12]  Ignacio E. Sánchez,et al.  The eukaryotic linear motif resource ELM: 10 years and counting , 2013, Nucleic Acids Res..

[13]  Philip R. Evans,et al.  How good are my data and what is the resolution? , 2013, Acta crystallographica. Section D, Biological crystallography.

[14]  Alan Bridge,et al.  New and continuing developments at PROSITE , 2012, Nucleic Acids Res..

[15]  P. Permi,et al.  SH3 domain ligand binding: What's the consensus and where's the specificity? , 2012, FEBS letters.

[16]  A. Davidson,et al.  Distinct Peptide Binding Specificities of Src Homology 3 (SH3) Protein Domains Can Be Determined by Modulation of Local Energetics across the Binding Interface* , 2012, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[17]  Gary D. Bader,et al.  MUSI: an integrated system for identifying multiple specificity from very large peptide or nucleic acid data sets , 2011, Nucleic acids research.

[18]  L. Holm,et al.  The Pfam protein families database , 2011, Nucleic Acids Res..

[19]  M. Teresa Pisabarro,et al.  SCOWLP update: 3D classification of protein-protein, -peptide, -saccharide and -nucleic acid interactions, and structure-based binding inferences across folds , 2011, BMC Bioinformatics.

[20]  N. Pannu,et al.  REFMAC5 for the refinement of macromolecular crystal structures , 2011, Acta crystallographica. Section D, Biological crystallography.

[21]  Sindy K. Y. Tang,et al.  Diversity of Phage-Displayed Libraries of Peptides during Panning and Amplification , 2011, Molecules.

[22]  Arnaud Céol,et al.  3did: identification and classification of domain-based interactions of known three-dimensional structure , 2010, Nucleic Acids Res..

[23]  Vincent B. Chen,et al.  MolProbity: all-atom structure validation for macromolecular crystallography , 2009, Acta crystallographica. Section D, Biological crystallography.

[24]  Gary D. Bader,et al.  Bayesian Modeling of the Yeast SH3 Domain Interactome Predicts Spatiotemporal Dynamics of Endocytosis Proteins , 2009, PLoS biology.

[25]  M. Lewitzky,et al.  Distinct binding modes of two epitopes in Gab2 that interact with the SH3C domain of Grb2. , 2009, Structure.

[26]  L. Shaw,et al.  Cell Communication and Signaling Crk and Crkl Adaptor Proteins: Networks for Physiological and Pathological Signaling , 2009 .

[27]  P. Permi,et al.  Structural basis of PxxDY motif recognition in SH3 binding. , 2009, Journal of molecular biology.

[28]  Chris Sander,et al.  A Specificity Map for the PDZ Domain Family , 2008, PLoS biology.

[29]  E. Reinherz,et al.  Structural and functional evidence that Nck interaction with CD3epsilon regulates T-cell receptor activity. , 2008, Journal of molecular biology.

[30]  Tony Pawson,et al.  Defining the Specificity Space of the Human Src Homology 2 Domain*S , 2008, Molecular & Cellular Proteomics.

[31]  T. Sakmar,et al.  A Novel Interaction between Atrophin-interacting Protein 4 and β-p21-activated Kinase-interactive Exchange Factor Is Mediated by an SH3 Domain* , 2007, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[32]  R. Wagner,et al.  Reciprocal Regulation of SH3 and SH2 Domain Binding via Tyrosine Phosphorylation of a Common Site in CD3ε1 , 2007, The Journal of Immunology.

[33]  Randy J. Read,et al.  Phaser crystallographic software , 2007, Journal of applied crystallography.

[34]  M. Shipston,et al.  A noncanonical SH3 domain binding motif links BK channels to the actin cytoskeleton via the SH3 adapter cortactin , 2006, FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology.

[35]  Kevin Cowtan,et al.  The Buccaneer software for automated model building. 1. Tracing protein chains. , 2006, Acta crystallographica. Section D, Biological crystallography.

[36]  Kevin Cowtan,et al.  The Buccaneer software for automated model building , 2006 .

[37]  A. Hoelz,et al.  Crystal structure of the SH3 domain of betaPIX in complex with a high affinity peptide from PAK2. , 2006, Journal of molecular biology.

[38]  Thomas Szyperski,et al.  A structure-based model of the c-Myc/Bin1 protein interaction shows alternative splicing of Bin1 and c-Myc phosphorylation are key binding determinants. , 2005, Journal of molecular biology.

[39]  Rolf Apweiler,et al.  InterProScan: protein domains identifier , 2005, Nucleic Acids Res..

[40]  Wendell A. Lim,et al.  Optimization of specificity in a cellular protein interaction network by negative selection , 2003, Nature.

[41]  M. Lewitzky,et al.  Structural basis for SH3 domain‐mediated high‐affinity binding between Mona/Gads and SLP‐76 , 2003, The EMBO journal.

[42]  T. Pawson,et al.  Assembly of Cell Regulatory Systems Through Protein Interaction Domains , 2003, Science.

[43]  Tony Pawson,et al.  Structural basis for specific binding of the Gads SH3 domain to an RxxK motif-containing SLP-76 peptide: a novel mode of peptide recognition. , 2003, Molecular cell.

[44]  Daisuke Kohda,et al.  Diverse recognition of non‐PxxP peptide ligands by the SH3 domains from p67phox, Grb2 and Pex13p , 2002, The EMBO journal.

[45]  K. Katoh,et al.  MAFFT: a novel method for rapid multiple sequence alignment based on fast Fourier transform. , 2002, Nucleic acids research.

[46]  Gianni Cesareni,et al.  Normalization of nomenclature for peptide motifs as ligands of modular protein domains , 2002, FEBS letters.

[47]  Gary D Bader,et al.  A Combined Experimental and Computational Strategy to Define Protein Interaction Networks for Peptide Recognition Modules , 2001, Science.

[48]  K. Miyazawa,et al.  A Deubiquitinating Enzyme UBPY Interacts with the Src Homology 3 Domain of Hrs-binding Protein via a Novel Binding Motif PX(V/I)(D/N)RXXKP* , 2000, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[49]  T. Pawson,et al.  Signaling through scaffold, anchoring, and adaptor proteins. , 1997, Science.

[50]  V S Lamzin,et al.  wARP: improvement and extension of crystallographic phases by weighted averaging of multiple-refined dummy atomic models. , 1997, Acta crystallographica. Section D, Biological crystallography.

[51]  Dan Gusfield,et al.  Algorithms on Strings, Trees, and Sequences - Computer Science and Computational Biology , 1997 .

[52]  B. Chait,et al.  Crystal Structure of the Conserved Core of HIV-1 Nef Complexed with a Src Family SH3 Domain , 1996, Cell.

[53]  Wendell A. Lim,et al.  Structural determinants of peptide-binding orientation and of sequence specificity in SH3 domains , 1995, Nature.

[54]  S. Schreiber,et al.  Two binding orientations for peptides to the Src SH3 domain: development of a general model for SH3-ligand interactions. , 1995, Science.

[55]  A. Sali,et al.  Structural basis for the specific interaction of lysine-containing proline-rich peptides with the N-terminal SH3 domain of c-Crk. , 1995, Structure.

[56]  M. Saraste,et al.  Backwards and forwards binding , 1994, Nature Structural Biology.

[57]  Andrea Musacchio,et al.  High-resolution crystal structures of tyrosine kinase SH3 domains complexed with proline-rich peptides , 1994, Nature Structural Biology.

[58]  Hongtao Yu,et al.  Structural basis for the binding of proline-rich peptides to SH3 domains , 1994, Cell.

[59]  P Cicchetti,et al.  Identification of a ten-amino acid proline-rich SH3 binding site. , 1993, Science.

[60]  D. Baltimore,et al.  Identification of a protein that binds to the SH3 region of Abl and is similar to Bcr and GAP-rho. , 1992, Science.

[61]  T. D. Schneider,et al.  Sequence logos: a new way to display consensus sequences. , 1990, Nucleic acids research.

[62]  Gary D Bader,et al.  SH3 interactome conserves general function over specific form , 2013, Molecular systems biology.

[63]  Sachdev S Sidhu,et al.  Engineering and analysis of peptide-recognition domain specificities by phage display and deep sequencing. , 2013, Methods in enzymology.

[64]  Livia Perfetto,et al.  The protein interaction network mediated by human SH3 domains. , 2012, Biotechnology advances.

[65]  Gary D Bader,et al.  The multiple-specificity landscape of modular peptide recognition domains , 2011, Molecular systems biology.

[66]  Sachdev S Sidhu,et al.  Studying binding specificities of peptide recognition modules by high-throughput phage display selections. , 2011, Methods in molecular biology.

[67]  Alexei Vagin,et al.  Molecular replacement with MOLREP. , 2010, Acta crystallographica. Section D, Biological crystallography.

[68]  P. Emsley,et al.  Features and development of Coot , 2010, Acta crystallographica. Section D, Biological crystallography.

[69]  Serge X. Cohen,et al.  Automated macromolecular model building for X-ray crystallography using ARP/wARP version 7 , 2008, Nature Protocols.

[70]  Raffi Tonikian,et al.  Identifying specificity profiles for peptide recognition modules from phage-displayed peptide libraries , 2007, Nature Protocols.

[71]  James E. Bray,et al.  The CATH database: an extended protein family resource for structural and functional genomics , 2003, Nucleic Acids Res..

[72]  Stefan M. Larson,et al.  The identification of conserved interactions within the SH3 domain by alignment of sequences and structures , 2000, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[73]  B. Mayer,et al.  Functions of SH2 and SH3 domains. , 1998, Current topics in microbiology and immunology.

[74]  D Cowburn,et al.  Modular peptide recognition domains in eukaryotic signaling. , 1997, Annual review of biophysics and biomolecular structure.

[75]  Z. Otwinowski,et al.  [20] Processing of X-ray diffraction data collected in oscillation mode. , 1997, Methods in enzymology.