Design of computer experiments for developing seismic surrogate models

Surrogate models are growing in popularity within the earthquake engineering community because of their ability to increase the efficiency of computationally intensive tasks. This article examines the design of computer experiments (DoCE) for the purpose of developing seismic surrogate models. Two categories of DoCE approaches are discussed while underscoring the benefits and drawbacks of specific methods. Further insight is provided through an illustrative case study that develops surrogate models to predict the median collapse capacity and expected annual losses in single-family woodframe buildings with cripple walls. The implications of the chosen DoCE method on the predictive performance and efficiency (in terms of the required number of explicit simulations) of the associated surrogate models are closely examined. The results show that both factorial and Latin hypercube designs [Formula: see text] do not perform well when different approaches are used to generate the training and testing sets (i.e. out-of-design-type testing). An efficient hybrid design that combines an orthogonal array-based composite design with a small number of [Formula: see text] samples is shown to produce a surrogate model with superior predictive performance.

[1]  Barry J. Goodno,et al.  Metamodel-based regional vulnerability estimate of irregular steel moment-frame structures subjected to earthquake events , 2012 .

[2]  Jack W. Baker,et al.  Incorporating modeling uncertainties in the assessment of seismic collapse risk of buildings , 2009 .

[3]  Seong-Hoon Hwang,et al.  Rapid seismic damage evaluation of bridge portfolios using machine learning techniques , 2019 .

[4]  Jong-Su Jeon,et al.  Stripe‐based fragility analysis of multispan concrete bridge classes using machine learning techniques , 2018, Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics.

[5]  Michael S. Eldred,et al.  OVERVIEW OF MODERN DESIGN OF EXPERIMENTS METHODS FOR COMPUTATIONAL SIMULATIONS , 2003 .

[6]  A. Owen Lattice Sampling Revisited: Monte Carlo Variance of Means Over Randomized Orthogonal Arrays , 1994 .

[7]  Michael D. McKay,et al.  Latin hypercube sampling as a tool in uncertainty analysis of computer models , 1992, WSC '92.

[8]  Vinay Ramanath,et al.  From Small X to Large X: Assessment of Space -Filling Criteria for the Design and Analysis of Computer Experiments , 2006 .

[9]  Andy J. Keane,et al.  Recent advances in surrogate-based optimization , 2009 .

[10]  Jian Yang,et al.  Use of Fractional Factorial Designs in Antiviral Drug Studies , 2013, Qual. Reliab. Eng. Int..

[11]  Lin Wang,et al.  Application of kriging models for a drug combination experiment on lung cancer , 2018, Statistics in medicine.

[12]  Ji Yun Lee,et al.  Multi-objective Performance-Based Design Optimization of a Controlled Rocking Steel Braced Frame System , 2019 .

[13]  Henry V. Burton,et al.  Parameterized fragility functions for controlled rocking steel braced frames , 2018, Engineering Structures.

[14]  David C. Miller,et al.  Learning surrogate models for simulation‐based optimization , 2014 .

[15]  Fooad Karimi Ghaleh Jough,et al.  Prediction of seismic collapse risk of steel moment frame mid-rise structures by meta-heuristic algorithms , 2016, Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration.

[16]  Priya Kohli ORTHOGONAL ARRAYS , 2008 .

[17]  Chih-Ming Ho,et al.  Use of Orthogonal Array Composite Designs to Study Lipid Accumulation in a Cell‐Free System , 2016, Qual. Reliab. Eng. Int..

[18]  Eusebio Valero,et al.  A review on design of experiments and surrogate models in aircraft real-time and many-query aerodynamic analyses , 2018 .

[19]  Henry V. Burton,et al.  Response surface analysis and optimization of controlled rocking steel braced frames , 2018, Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering.

[20]  Yong Zhang,et al.  Uniform Design: Theory and Application , 2000, Technometrics.