The Arabidopsis thaliana flower organ specification gene regulatory network determines a robust differentiation process.

The Arabidopsis thaliana flower organ specification gene regulatory network (FOS-GRN) has been modeled previously as a discrete dynamical system, recovering as steady states configurations that match the genetic profiles described in primordial cells of inflorescence, sepals, petals, stamens and carpels during early flower development. In this study, we first update the FOS-GRN by adding interactions and modifying some rules according to new experimental data. A discrete model of this updated version of the network has a dynamical behavior identical to previous versions, under both wild type and mutant conditions, thus confirming its robustness. Then, we develop a continuous version of the FOS-GRN using a new methodology that builds upon previous proposals. The fixed point attractors of the discrete system are all observed in the continuous model, but the latter also contains new steady states that might correspond to genetic activation states present briefly during the early phases of flower development. We show that both the discrete and the continuous models recover the observed stable gene configurations observed in the inflorescence meristem, as well as the primordial cells of sepals, petals, stamens and carpels. Additionally, both models are subjected to perturbations in order to establish the nature of additional signals that may suffice to determine the experimentally observed order of appearance of floral organs. Our results thus describe a possible mechanism by which the network canalizes molecular signals and/or noise, thus conferring robustness to the differentiation process.

[1]  F. Turck,et al.  The impact of chromatin regulation on the floral transition. , 2008, Seminars in cell & developmental biology.

[2]  E. Álvarez-Buylla,et al.  Dynamics of the genetic regulatory network for Arabidopsis thaliana flower morphogenesis. , 1998, Journal of theoretical biology.

[3]  Elliot M. Meyerowitz,et al.  The homeotic gene APETALA3 of Arabidopsis thaliana encodes a MADS box and is expressed in petals and stamens , 1992, Cell.

[4]  Donald E Ingber,et al.  A non-genetic basis for cancer progression and metastasis: self-organizing attractors in cell regulatory networks. , 2006, Breast disease.

[5]  Z. R. Sung,et al.  EMBRYONIC FLOWER1 Participates in Polycomb Group–Mediated AG Gene Silencing in Arabidopsis[W] , 2008, The Plant Cell Online.

[6]  G. Odell,et al.  The segment polarity network is a robust developmental module , 2000, Nature.

[7]  Michael K. Deyholos,et al.  Separable Whorl-Specific Expression and Negative Regulation by Enhancer Elements within the AGAMOUS Second Intron , 2000, Plant Cell.

[8]  F. Parcy Flowering: a time for integration. , 2005, The International journal of developmental biology.

[9]  Gerco C. Angenent,et al.  Transcriptional program controlled by the floral homeotic gene AGAMOUS during early organogenesis , 2005, Development.

[10]  E. Coen,et al.  Separable roles of UFO during floral development revealed by conditional restoration of gene function , 2003, Development.

[11]  E M Meyerowitz,et al.  LEUNIG regulates AGAMOUS expression in Arabidopsis flowers. , 1995, Development.

[12]  E. Meyerowitz,et al.  Determination of floral organ identity by Arabidopsis MADS domain homeotic proteins AP1, AP3, PI, and AG is independent of their DNA-binding specificity. , 1997, Molecular biology of the cell.

[13]  Giovanni De Micheli,et al.  Dynamic simulation of regulatory networks using SQUAD , 2007, BMC Bioinformatics.

[14]  E. Coen,et al.  The war of the whorls: genetic interactions controlling flower development , 1991, Nature.

[15]  Ioannis Xenarios,et al.  A method for the generation of standardized qualitative dynamical systems of regulatory networks , 2005, Theoretical Biology and Medical Modelling.

[16]  Mariana Benítez,et al.  Gene regulatory network models for plant development. , 2007, Current opinion in plant biology.

[17]  Denis Thieffry,et al.  Genetic control of flower morphogenesis in Arabidopsis thaliana: a logical analysis , 1999, Bioinform..

[18]  K. Glimelius,et al.  Direct regulation of the floral homeotic APETALA1 gene by APETALA3 and PISTILLATA in Arabidopsis. , 2006, The Plant journal : for cell and molecular biology.

[19]  Z. R. Sung,et al.  EMF genes regulate Arabidopsis inflorescence development. , 1997, The Plant cell.

[20]  W. Crosby,et al.  The UNUSUAL FLORAL ORGANS gene of Arabidopsis thaliana is an F-box protein required for normal patterning and growth in the floral meristem. , 1999, The Plant journal : for cell and molecular biology.

[21]  S. Shannon,et al.  Genetic Interactions That Regulate Inflorescence Development in Arabidopsis. , 1993, The Plant cell.

[22]  E. Meyerowitz,et al.  Arabidopsis homeotic gene APETALA3 ectopic expression: Transcriptional and posttranscriptional regulation determine floral organ identity , 1994, Cell.

[23]  J. Bowman,et al.  Negative regulation of the Arabidopsis homeotic gene AGAMOUS by the APETALA2 product , 1991, Cell.

[24]  C. Dean,et al.  The Timing of Developmental Transitions in Plants , 2006, Cell.

[25]  C. Espinosa-Soto,et al.  A Gene Regulatory Network Model for Cell-Fate Determination during Arabidopsis thaliana Flower Development That Is Robust and Recovers Experimental Gene Expression Profilesw⃞ , 2004, The Plant Cell Online.

[26]  Luis Mendoza,et al.  A network model for the control of the differentiation process in Th cells. , 2006, Bio Systems.

[27]  M. Lenhard,et al.  Termination of Stem Cell Maintenance in Arabidopsis Floral Meristems by Interactions between WUSCHEL and AGAMOUS , 2001, Cell.

[28]  Heiko Schoof,et al.  Role of WUSCHEL in Regulating Stem Cell Fate in the Arabidopsis Shoot Meristem , 1998, Cell.

[29]  H. Hooker Plant Growth. , 1925, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[30]  M. Aldana,et al.  From Genes to Flower Patterns and Evolution: Dynamic Models of Gene Regulatory Networks , 2006, Journal of Plant Growth Regulation.

[31]  P. Más,et al.  Circadian clock function in Arabidopsis thaliana: time beyond transcription. , 2008, Trends in cell biology.

[32]  H. Othmer,et al.  The topology of the regulatory interactions predicts the expression pattern of the segment polarity genes in Drosophila melanogaster. , 2003, Journal of theoretical biology.

[33]  L. Glass Classification of biological networks by their qualitative dynamics. , 1975, Journal of theoretical biology.

[34]  Cindy Gustafson-Brown,et al.  Regulation of the arabidopsis floral homeotic gene APETALA1 , 1994, Cell.

[35]  Elena R. Álvarez-Buylla,et al.  Interlinked nonlinear subnetworks underlie the formation of robust cellular patterns in Arabidopsis epidermis: a dynamic spatial model , 2008, BMC Systems Biology.

[36]  J. Micol,et al.  INCURVATA2 Encodes the Catalytic Subunit of DNA Polymerase α and Interacts with Genes Involved in Chromatin-Mediated Cellular Memory in Arabidopsis thaliana , 2007, The Plant Cell Online.

[37]  R. Albert,et al.  Predicting Essential Components of Signal Transduction Networks: A Dynamic Model of Guard Cell Abscisic Acid Signaling , 2006, PLoS biology.

[38]  M. Aldana,et al.  Floral Morphogenesis: Stochastic Explorations of a Gene Network Epigenetic Landscape , 2008, PloS one.

[39]  J. Bowman,et al.  Early flower development in Arabidopsis. , 1990, The Plant cell.

[40]  Hur-Song Chang,et al.  EMF Genes Maintain Vegetative Development by Repressing the Flower Program in Arabidopsis Online version contains Web-only data. Article, publication date, and citation information can be found at www.plantcell.org/cgi/doi/10.1105/tpc.007831. , 2003, The Plant Cell Online.

[41]  J L Bowman,et al.  Genes directing flower development in Arabidopsis. , 1989, The Plant cell.

[42]  Queenie K.-G. Tan,et al.  An Arabidopsis F-box protein acts as a transcriptional co-factor to regulate floral development , 2008, Development.