Calibration of Regional S/P Amplitude-ratio Discriminants

Abstract — S/P amplitude ratios have proven to be a valuable discriminant in support of monitoring a Comprehensive Nuclear Test Ban Treaty. Regional S and P phases attenuate at different rates and the attenuation can vary geographically. Therefore, calibration is needed to apply the S/P discriminant in new regions. Calibration includes application of frequency-dependent source and distance corrections for regional Pn, Pg, Sn, and Lg phases.¶Jenkins et al. (1998) developed Pn, Pg, Sn, and Lg amplitude models for nine geographic regions and two global composite models, stable and tectonic. They determined frequency-dependent source and attenuation corrections from a large data set obtained from the Prototype International Data Center (PIDC). We use their corrections to evaluate calibrated S/P discriminants.¶Our discrimination data set includes >1000 amplitude ratios from earthquakes, industrial explosions, chemical explosions, and nuclear explosions from Lop Nor, India and Pakistan. We find that the calibrated S/P ratio is largest for earthquakes and smallest for the nuclear explosions, as expected. However, the discriminant is not universally valid. In particular, the S/P ratio for the Pakistan nuclear explosion fell within the normal range for the earthquakes. This event was recorded by only a few stations at far-regional distances and appears to have an anomalously high Sn amplitude. The industrial explosions overlap with the earthquake population, however the buried chemical explosions generally register lower S/P ratio than earthquakes.

[1]  Douglas R. Baumgardt,et al.  Regional seismic waveform discriminants and case-based event identification using regional arrays , 1990 .

[2]  Paul W. Pomeroy,et al.  Test ban treaty verification with regional data—A review , 1982 .

[3]  Steven R. Taylor,et al.  Regional discrimination between NTS explosions and western U.S. earthquakes , 1989 .

[4]  Jay J. Pulli,et al.  Regional seismic event classification at the NORESS array: Seismological measurements and the use of trained neural networks , 1990 .

[5]  P. Richards,et al.  Discrimination of earthquakes and explosions in southern Russia using regional high-frequency three-component data from the IRIS/JSP Caucasus network , 1997, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America.

[6]  Steven R. Taylor,et al.  Spectral discrimination between NTS explosions and Western United States earthquakes at regional distances , 1988 .

[7]  Keith L. McLaughlin,et al.  Regional discrimination of quarry blasts, earthquakes and underground nuclear explosions. Final report, 23 March 1987-22 March 1989 , 1989 .

[8]  T. J. Bennett,et al.  Analysis of seismic discrimination capabilities using regional data from western United States events , 1986 .

[9]  Steven R. Taylor,et al.  A procedure for estimation of source and propagation amplitude corrections for regional seismic discriminants , 1998 .

[10]  J. Given,et al.  Pn attenuation for a spherically symmetric Earth model , 1990 .

[11]  D. E. Willis,et al.  Differentiation of earthquakes and underground nuclear explosions on the basis of amplitude characteristics , 1963 .

[12]  William Scott Phillips,et al.  A preliminary study of regional seismic discrimination in central Asia with emphasis on western China , 1996, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America.

[13]  Steven R. Taylor,et al.  An evaluation of generalized likelihood Ratio Outlier Detection to identification of seismic events in Western China , 1996 .

[14]  T. C. Bache,et al.  Simultaneous inversion of regional wave spectra for attenuation and seismic moment in Scandinavia , 1988 .

[15]  H. Bungum,et al.  The Meløy earthquake sequence, northern Norway: Source parameters and their scaling relations , 1982 .

[16]  J. R. Murphy,et al.  Demonstration of regional discrimination of Eurasian seismic events using observations at Soviet IRIS and CDSN stations. Final report, 29 Mar 89-28 Mar 92 , 1992 .

[17]  R. Blandford.  Seismic Discrimination Problems at Regional Distances , 1981 .

[18]  Fisk,et al.  Applications of generalized likelihood ratio tests to seismic event identification. Final report, 25 May 1990-25 August 1993 , 1993 .