Towards a model-based approach to evaluate the effectiveness of e-learning

There is a lack of a standard based approach that can be used to evaluate the effectiveness of different e-learning models due to their diversity and complexity. This paper introduces a new evaluation approach to assess the effectiveness of e-learning models. This approach is derived using: (i) the ISO 25010 “Systems and software Quality Requirements and Evaluation (SQuaRE): System and software quality models” and (ii) the ISO 25012 “Systems and software Quality Requirements and Evaluation (SQuaRE): Data quality model”. Hence, the proposed evaluation approach is based on the following three main models: (i) quality in use, (ii) product quality and (iii) data quality models. In this research the proposed evaluation approach has been applied to compare and evaluate capabilities of five different e-learning models. In addition to core qualities of ISO25010 and ISO25012 models, new qualities such as pedagogical, semantic and process-based techniques are defined to accommodate domain-specific aspects. The application of the proposed evaluation approach reveals promising results such as: (i) its ability to abstract the semantic heterogeneity between different terminologies used to describe the capabilities of different e-learning models and (ii) its holistic approach as well as its ability to be extended to assess unstructured e-learning contents. Additionally, this research identifies a list of e-learning models’ capabilities where some are common between different models e.g. interoperability and reusability; and others are specific to certain models such as processability.

[1]  Rob Koper,et al.  Modeling units of learning from a pedagogical perspective , 2003 .

[2]  Ming-Lang Tseng,et al.  Evaluating the effectiveness of e-learning system in uncertainty , 2011, Ind. Manag. Data Syst..

[3]  David Ludlow,et al.  Exploring population distribution and motion dynamics through mobile phone device data in selected cities – lessons learned from the UrbanAPI project , 2014 .

[4]  Jorge Pérez,et al.  Informing and Performing: A Study Comparing Adaptive Learning to Traditional Learning , 2015, Informing Sci. Int. J. an Emerg. Transdiscipl..

[5]  Zaheer Abbas Khan,et al.  Towards A Generic Requirements Model for Hybrid and Cloud-based e-Learning Systems , 2013, 2013 IEEE 5th International Conference on Cloud Computing Technology and Science.

[6]  Bee Bee Chua,et al.  Applying the ISO 9126 model to the evaluation of an e- learning system , 2004 .

[7]  Jordi Cabot,et al.  Model-Driven Software Engineering in Practice , 2017, Synthesis Lectures on Software Engineering.

[8]  Mathias Weske,et al.  Business Process Management: A Survey , 2003, Business Process Management.

[9]  Meg Murray,et al.  Informing and Performing: A Study ComparingAdaptive Learning to Traditional Learning , 2015 .

[10]  Tullio Vardanega,et al.  An architectural approach with separation of concerns to address extra-functional requirements in the development of embedded real-time software systems , 2014, J. Syst. Archit..

[11]  Hal G. Gueutal,et al.  Technology, trainees, metacognitive activity and e‐learning effectiveness , 2009 .

[12]  Rawad. Hammad,et al.  Evaluating the use of WebCT in teaching at the Islamic University of Gaza , 2006 .

[13]  David Ludlow,et al.  Applying the criteria indicators and metrics evaluation method on ICT research: The HUMBOLDT project , 2013 .

[14]  Luis Olsina,et al.  Instantiating Web Quality Models in a Purposeful Way , 2011, ICWE.

[15]  Stephan Weibelzahl Problems and Pitfalls in the Evaluation of Adaptive Systems , 2005 .

[16]  Keith Williams,et al.  Quality Assessment for E-learning: a Benchmarking Approach (2nd ed.) , 2012 .

[17]  Richard McClatchey,et al.  Bridging the gap between business process models and service-oriented architectures with reference to the grid environment , 2011, Int. J. Grid Util. Comput..

[18]  Laura Varela-Candamio,et al.  E-learning and face to face mixed methodology: Evaluating effectiveness of e-learning and perceived satisfaction for a microeconomic course using the Moodle platform , 2013, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[19]  Zhang Li,et al.  Information Quality Evaluation Framework: Extending ISO 25012 Data Quality Model , 2012 .

[20]  Luis E. Anido-Rifón,et al.  Challenges in Educational Modelling: Expressiveness of IMS Learning Design , 2010, J. Educ. Technol. Soc..