Competition strategy and efficiency evaluation for decision making units with fixed-sum outputs

This paper develops a DEA (data envelopment analysis) model to accommodate competition over outputs. In the proposed model, the total output of all decision making units (DMUs) is fixed, and DMUs compete with each other to maximize their self-rated DEA efficiency score. In the presence of competition over outputs, the best-practice frontier deviates from the classical DEA frontier. We also compute the efficiency scores using the proposed fixed sum output DEA (FSODEA) models, and discuss the competition strategy selection rule. The model is illustrated using a hypothetical data set under the constant returns to scale assumption and medal data from the 2000 Sydney Olympics under the variable returns to scale assumption.

[1]  John J. Rousseau,et al.  Two-person ratio efficiency games , 1995 .

[2]  Chiang Kao,et al.  Efficiency decomposition in two-stage data envelopment analysis: An application to non-life insurance companies in Taiwan , 2008, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[3]  P. Gertler,et al.  Trends in hospital consolidation: the formation of local systems. , 2003, Health affairs.

[4]  Chien-Ming Chen,et al.  Production , Manufacturing and Logistics A network-DEA model with new efficiency measures to incorporate the dynamic effect in production networks , 2008 .

[5]  Desheng Dash Wu,et al.  Performance evaluation: An integrated method using data envelopment analysis and fuzzy preference relations , 2009, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[6]  Sebastián Lozano,et al.  Measuring the performance of nations at the Summer Olympics using data envelopment analysis , 2002, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[7]  Abraham Charnes,et al.  Measuring the efficiency of decision making units , 1978 .

[8]  Boaz Golany,et al.  Foundations of data envelopment analysis for Pareto-Koopmans efficient empirical production functions , 1985 .

[9]  A. Charnes,et al.  Some Models for Estimating Technical and Scale Inefficiencies in Data Envelopment Analysis , 1984 .

[10]  Nicole Adler,et al.  Improving discrimination in data envelopment analysis: PCA-DEA or variable reduction , 2010, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[11]  A. Charnes,et al.  Polyhedral Cone-Ratio DEA Models with an illustrative application to large commercial banks , 1990 .

[12]  Abraham Charnes,et al.  Cone ratio data envelopment analysis and multi-objective programming , 1989 .

[13]  Kenneth C. Land,et al.  Chance‐constrained data envelopment analysis , 1993 .

[14]  Desheng Dash Wu,et al.  Bargaining in competing supply chains with uncertainty , 2009, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[15]  Desheng Dash Wu,et al.  Stochastic DEA with ordinal data applied to a multi-attribute pricing problem , 2010, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[16]  Eliane Gonçalves Gomes,et al.  Olympic ranking based on a zero sum gains DEA model , 2003, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[17]  Armando Zeferino Milioni,et al.  Spherical frontier DEA model based on a constant sum of inputs , 2007, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[18]  Desheng Dash Wu,et al.  BiLevel programming Data Envelopment Analysis with constrained resource , 2010, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[19]  Marcos Pereira Estellita Lins,et al.  Modelling undesirable outputs with zero sum gains data envelopment analysis models , 2008, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[20]  Leonid Churilov,et al.  Towards fair ranking of Olympics achievements: the case of Sydney 2000 , 2006, Comput. Oper. Res..

[21]  P. Andersen,et al.  A procedure for ranking efficient units in data envelopment analysis , 1993 .

[22]  Kenneth C. Land,et al.  Productive Efficiency under Capitalism and State Socialism: An Empirical Inquiry Using Chance-Constrained Data Envelopment Analysis , 1994 .

[23]  Barton A. Smith,et al.  Comparative Site Evaluations for Locating a High-Energy Physics Lab in Texas , 1986 .

[24]  N. Petersen,et al.  Chance constrained efficiency evaluation , 1995 .

[25]  Kaoru Tone,et al.  Network DEA: A slacks-based measure approach , 2009, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[26]  William W. CooperKyung IDEA and AR-IDEA: Models for Dealing with Imprecise Data in DEA , 1999 .