R&D intensity, firm performance and the identification of the threshold: fresh evidence from the panel threshold regression model

This article tests whether there is an optimal level of research and development (R&D) intensity at which point a firm is able to maximize its performance. An advanced panel threshold regression model is employed to investigate the panel threshold effect of R&D intensity on firm performance among publicly traded Taiwan information technology and electronic firms. The results confirm that a single-threshold effect does exist and show an inverted-U correlation between R&D intensity and firm performance. This article demonstrates that it is possible to identify the definitive level beyond which a further increase in R&D expenditure does not yield proportional rewards. Some important policy implications emerge from the findings.

[1]  Katharina Wakelin,et al.  Productivity growth and R&D expenditure in UK manufacturing firms , 2001 .

[2]  Graham K. Morbey.  R&D Expenditures and Profit Growth , 1989 .

[3]  D. Ravenscraft,et al.  LBOs, debt and R&D intensity , 1993 .

[4]  Luis R. Gomez-Mejia,et al.  Structure and process of diversification, compensation strategy, and firm performance , 1992 .

[5]  Rafael Llorca Vivero,et al.  The impact of process innovations on firm's productivity growth: the case of Spain , 2002 .

[6]  Cheng-Jen Huang,et al.  Exploration for the Relationship between Innovation, IT and Performance , 2005 .

[7]  W. W. McCutchen,et al.  Effect of R&D expenditures and funding strategies on the market value of biotech firms , 1996 .

[8]  K. Chan,et al.  Consistency and limiting distribution of the least squares estimator of a threshold autoregressive model , 1993 .

[9]  Robert F. Bordley,et al.  R&D and Global Manufacturing Performance , 1998 .

[10]  Jonathan O'Brien,et al.  The capital structure implications of pursuing a strategy of innovation , 2003 .

[11]  Karel Cool,et al.  Performance differences among strategic group members , 1988 .

[12]  C. C. Pegels,et al.  The impact of technology strategy on firm performance , 1996 .

[13]  I. Martínez‐Zarzoso,et al.  The determinants of trade performance: influence of R&D on export flows , 2000 .

[14]  F. M. Scherer,et al.  The lag structure of returns to research and development , 1982 .

[15]  Jacques Mairesse,et al.  R&D Productivity: A Survey of Econometric Studies at the Firm Level , 1991 .

[16]  G. Fryxell.  Multiple Outcomes from Product R&D: Profitability Under Different Strategic Orientations , 1990 .

[17]  Karel Cool,et al.  Strategic Group Formation and Performance: The Case of the U.S. Pharmaceutical Industry, 1963-1982 , 1987 .

[18]  Bohumír Pazderka,et al.  Firm value and investment in R&D , 1993 .

[19]  Sune Karlsson,et al.  Lag-length selection in VAR-models using equal and unequal lag-length procedures , 1999, Comput. Stat..

[20]  Petri Rouvinen,et al.  R&D—Productivity Dynamics: Causality, Lags, and ‘Dry Holes’ , 2002 .

[21]  Bruce E. Hansen,et al.  Threshold effects in non-dynamic panels: Estimation, testing, and inference , 1999 .

[22]  Andrew T. Levin,et al.  Unit root tests in panel data: asymptotic and finite-sample properties , 2002 .

[23]  K. Pavitt.  What We Know about the Strategic Management of Technology , 1990 .

[24]  Jean-Yves Pitarakis,et al.  Lag length estimation in large dimensional systems , 2002 .

[25]  M. Hirschey,et al.  Advertising, R&D Expenditures and the Market Value of the Firm , 1993 .

[26]  Lawrence G. Franko,et al.  Global corporate competition: Who's winning, who's losing, and the R&D factor as one reason why , 1989 .

[27]  Kenneth D. Gartrell.  Innovation, Industry Specialization, and Shareholder Wealth , 1990 .

[28]  Alfredo Del Monte,et al.  R&D and the growth of firms: empirical analysis of a panel of Italian firms ☆ , 2003 .

[29]  F. Peter Boer.  Linking R&D To Growth and Shareholder Value , 1994 .

[30]  Graham K. Morbey,et al.  R&D: Its relationship to company performance , 1988 .

[31]  M. Pesaran,et al.  Testing for unit roots in heterogeneous panels , 2003 .

[32]  Kiyohiko Ito,et al.  R&D spending, domestic competition, and export performance of Japanese manufacturing firms , 1993 .

[33]  D. Thornton,et al.  Lag-Length Selection and Tests of Granger Causality between Money and Income , 1984 .

[34]  P. Beamish,et al.  INTERNATIONAL DIVERSIFICATION AND FIRM PERFORMANCE: THE S-CURVE HYPOTHESIS , 2004 .

[35]  Shih-Chang Hung,et al.  R&D intensity and commercialization orientation effects on financial performance , 2006 .

[36]  W. W. McCutchen.  Estimating the impact of the R&D tax credit on strategic groups in the pharmaceutical industry , 1993 .

[37]  G. Erickson,et al.  Gaining comparative advantage through discretionary expenditures: the returns to R&D and advertising , 1992 .

[38]  G. Morbey,et al.  How R&D Affects Sales Growth, Productivity and Profitability , 1990 .

[39]  Alessandro Sterlacchini,et al.  Do innovative activities matter to small firms in non-R&D-intensive industries? An application to export performance , 1999 .

[40]  Hean Tat Keh,et al.  The effects of R&D and advertising on firm value: an examination of manufacturing and nonmanufacturing firms , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management.

[41]  Robert A. Connolly,et al.  Firm Size and the Effect of R&D on Tobin's Q , 2005 .

[42]  Jacques Mairesse,et al.  Exploring the Relationship between R&D and Productivity in French Manufacturing Firms , 1992 .

[43]  Robert A. Connolly,et al.  R&D, Market Structure, and Profits: A Value-Based Approach , 1984 .

[44]  B. Hansen.  Sample Splitting and Threshold Estimation , 2000 .

[45]  O. Felix Ayadi,et al.  Firm Performance Measures: Temporal Roadblocks to Innovation? , 1996 .

[46]  Raffaele Oriani,et al.  Does the Market Value R&D Investment by European Firms? Evidence from a Panel of Manufacturing Firms in France, Germany, and Italy , 2004 .

[47]  Bruce E. Hansen,et al.  Inference When a Nuisance Parameter Is Not Identified under the Null Hypothesis , 1996 .

[48]  R. Davies.  Hypothesis testing when a nuisance parameter is present only under the alternative , 1977 .

[49]  G. Tassey.  Competitive strategies and performance in technology-based industries , 1983 .

[50]  Y. Shou,et al.  Firm size, R&D, and performance: an empirical analysis on software industry in China , 2004, 2004 IEEE International Engineering Management Conference (IEEE Cat. No.04CH37574).

[51]  Ananthanarayanan Parasuraman,et al.  R&D's Relationship With Profits and Sales : Research Management , 1983 .

[52]  Bou-Wen Lin,et al.  Corporate Technology Portfolios and R&D Performance Measures: A Study of Technology Intensive Firms , 2005 .

[53]  M. Nadiri,et al.  Interindustry R&D Spillovers, Rates of Return, and Production in High-Tech Industries , 1988 .

[54]  M. Villani.  Fractional Bayesian Lag Length Inference in Multivariate Autoregressive Processes , 2001 .

[55]  F. Lichtenberg,et al.  The Impact of R&D Investment on Productivity - New Evidence Using Linked R&D-Lrd Data , 1989 .

[56]  Philip A. Rousselon,et al.  The evolution of Third Generation R&D , 1991 .

[57]  Ben S. Branch.  Research and Development Activity and Profitability: A Distributed Lag Analysis , 1974, Journal of Political Economy.

[58]  C. Yap,et al.  Size, Leverage, Concentration, and R&D Investment in Generating Growth Opportunities , 2006 .

[59]  W. Douglas McMillin,et al.  Lag length selection in vector autoregressive models: symmetric and asymmetric lags , 1999 .

[60]  Sung C. Bae,et al.  The Effect of R&D Investments on Market Value of Firms: Evidence from the U.S., Germany, and Japan , 2003 .

[61]  Richard S. Rosenbloom,et al.  Planning Your Firm's R&D Investment , 2006 .

[62]  Jooh Lee,et al.  Moderating effects of R&D on corporate growth in U.S. and Japanese hi-tech industries: An empirical study , 1995 .