Multitask electrical stimulation for cortical language mapping: Hints for necessity and economic mode of application

Purpose:  Electrical stimulation mapping (ESM) is the gold standard for identifying language‐relevant cortex prior to neurosurgical resections near the eloquent cortex. However, its application mode is not standardized, as some procedures rely on a single task, whereas others depend on task batteries. In this study, we examine whether multitask ESM is necessary, quantify the information loss that occurs from restricting the number of applied tasks, and search for a procedure that allows for time‐efficient, multitask ESM.

[1]  M M Haglund,et al.  Cortical localization of temporal lobe language sites in patients with gliomas. , 1994, Neurosurgery.

[2]  R. Goodman,et al.  Distribution of Auditory and Visual Naming Sites in Nonlesional Temporal Lobe Epilepsy Patients and Patients with Space‐Occupying Temporal Lobe Lesions , 2007, Epilepsia.

[3]  G. Ojemann,et al.  Localization of language function in children: results of electrical stimulation mapping. , 2003, Journal of neurosurgery.

[4]  O. Devinsky,et al.  Function‐Specific High‐Probability “Nodes” Identified in Posterior Language Cortex , 1999, Epilepsia.

[5]  F. Roux,et al.  Organization of language areas in bilingual patients: a cortical stimulation study. , 2002, Journal of neurosurgery.

[6]  H. Lüders,et al.  Quantitative Comparison of Language Deficits Produced by Extraoperative Electrical Stimulation of Broca's, Wernicke's, and Basal Temporal Language Areas , 1996, Epilepsia.

[7]  Volkmar Glauche,et al.  Ventral and dorsal pathways for language , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[8]  George A. Ojemann,et al.  Electrical stimulation and the neurobiology of language , 1983, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[9]  C. Price The anatomy of language: contributions from functional neuroimaging , 2000, Journal of anatomy.

[10]  G. Ojemann,et al.  Cortical language localization in left, dominant hemisphere. An electrical stimulation mapping investigation in 117 patients. , 1989, Journal of neurosurgery.

[11]  G. Thierry,et al.  Renewal of the neurophysiology of language: functional neuroimaging. , 2005, Physiological reviews.

[12]  P. M. S. Hacker,et al.  Language and cortical function: Conceptual developments , 2006, Progress in Neurobiology.

[13]  H. Lüders,et al.  Localization of Cortical Function: New Information from Extraoperative Monitoring of Patients with Epilepsy , 1988, Epilepsia.

[14]  M. Hamberger,et al.  Cortical Language Mapping in Epilepsy: A Critical Review , 2007, Neuropsychology Review.

[15]  Wilhelm Eisner,et al.  Performance in Picture Naming and Word Comprehension: Evidence for Common Neuronal Substrates from Intraoperative Language Mapping , 2001, Brain and Language.

[16]  R. Glantz The advantages of simple systems in neuroethology , 1979, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[17]  R. Maxwell,et al.  Language function following subdural grid‐directed temporal lobectomy , 1994, Acta neurologica Scandinavica.

[18]  Mitchel S. Berger,et al.  Intraoperative Speech Mapping in 17 Bilingual Patients Undergoing Resection of a Mass Lesion , 2004, Neurosurgery.

[19]  Daniel M. Branco,et al.  Object naming is a more sensitive measure of speech localization than number counting: Converging evidence from direct cortical stimulation and fMRI , 2007, NeuroImage.

[20]  C. Elger,et al.  Digital Photography and 3D MRI–based Multimodal Imaging for Individualized Planning of Resective Neocortical Epilepsy Surgery , 2002, Epilepsia.

[21]  Kenneth Perrine,et al.  Brain stimulation reveals critical auditory naming cortex. , 2005, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[22]  E. Renzi,et al.  The token test: A sensitive test to detect receptive disturbances in aphasics. , 1962, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[23]  K. Boulanouar,et al.  Language Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Preoperative Assessment of Language Areas: Correlation with Direct Cortical Stimulation , 2003, Neurosurgery.