No waves of intelligent design

In PNAS, Phillips (1) attempts to explore the evolution of dynein, a major motor protein of the eukaryotic cytoskeleton, using different hydropathy scales, and comes to several dramatic conclusions. The results of this analysis are taken to indicate that self-organized criticality (SOC) is integral to evolutionary optimization, that evolution of all proteins occurs, primarily, via positive selection, that this pervasive positive selection is shaped by “water waves” traveling along proteins, and even that the optimization in protein evolution stems from intelligent design. However, the actual observations reported in the article do not appear to support or even to be compatible with any of these far-reaching conclusions. What the paper effectively … [↵][1]1To whom correspondence may be addressed. Email: koonin{at}ncbi.nlm.nih.gov. [1]: #xref-corresp-1-1

[1]  J. Phillips,et al.  Self-organized networks: Darwinian evolution of dynein rings, stalks, and stalk heads , 2020, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[2]  S. Burgess,et al.  Functions and mechanics of dynein motor proteins , 2013, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[3]  Gregory C. Finnigan,et al.  Evolution of increased complexity in a molecular machine , 2012, Nature.

[4]  J. Phillips Hydropathic self-organized criticality: a magic wand for protein physics. , 2011, Protein and peptide letters.

[5]  Michael W. Gray,et al.  Irremediable Complexity? , 2010, Science.

[6]  Detlef D. Leipe,et al.  Evolutionary history and higher order classification of AAA+ ATPases. , 2004, Journal of structural biology.

[7]  A. Stoltzfus On the Possibility of Constructive Neutral Evolution , 1999, Journal of Molecular Evolution.

[8]  P. Bak,et al.  Complexity, contingency, and criticality. , 1995, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.