Lagged covariance structure models for studying functional connectivity in the brain

Most cognitive processes are supported by large networks of brain regions. To describe the operation of these networks, it is critical to understand how individual areas are functionally connected. Here, we establish a statistical framework for studying effective and functional brain connectivity, using data obtained with a relatively new neuroimaging method, the event-related optical signal (EROS). The novelty of our approach is the use of timing information (in the form of lagged cross-correlations) in interpreting the connections between areas. Interpretation of lagged cross-correlations exploits the combination of spatial and temporal resolution provided by EROS. In this paper, we apply dynamic factor analysis as a method for testing various structural models on the lagged covariance matrices derived from the EROS data. We first illustrate the approach by testing a simple path model of neural activity propagation from area V1 to V3 in a visual stimulation task. We then build more complex structural equation models with latent variables, describing both within-hemisphere integrity, and interactions between the two hemispheres, to interpret data from a second task involving inter-hemispheric competition. The results demonstrate how the integrity of anatomical connections between the two hemispheres explains different patterns of cross-hemispheric interactions. This approach allows for fitting brain imaging data to complex models that capture dynamic cognitive processes as they rapidly evolve over time.

[1]  K J Friston,et al.  The predictive value of changes in effective connectivity for human learning. , 1999, Science.

[2]  J. Bullier,et al.  Visual latencies in areas V1 and V2 of the macaque monkey , 1995, Visual Neuroscience.

[3]  Chantal Delon-Martin,et al.  Sequence of pattern onset responses in the human visual areas: an fMRI constrained VEP source analysis , 2004, NeuroImage.

[4]  D. Hood,et al.  Shades of gray matter: noninvasive optical images of human brain responses during visual stimulation. , 1995, Psychophysiology.

[5]  Eiji Okada,et al.  A Theoretical Study of the Signal Contribution of Regions of the Adult Head to Near-Infrared Spectroscopy Studies of Visual Evoked Responses , 1998, NeuroImage.

[6]  G A Ivanitsky,et al.  Cortical connectivity during word association search. , 2001, International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology.

[7]  P. Bentler,et al.  Significance Tests and Goodness of Fit in the Analysis of Covariance Structures , 1980 .

[8]  D. Delpy,et al.  Near-infrared light propagation in an adult head model. I. Modeling of low-level scattering in the cerebrospinal fluid layer. , 2003, Applied optics.

[9]  Adam Gazzaley,et al.  Measuring functional connectivity during distinct stages of a cognitive task , 2004, NeuroImage.

[10]  W. Singer,et al.  Testing non-linearity and directedness of interactions between neural groups in the macaque inferotemporal cortex , 1999, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[11]  Raja Parasuraman,et al.  Neuroergonomics: The Brain at Work , 2006 .

[12]  C. Büchel,et al.  Dynamic changes in effective connectivity characterized by variable parameter regression and kalman filtering , 1998, Human brain mapping.

[13]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Functional topography: multidimensional scaling and functional connectivity in the brain. , 1996, Cerebral cortex.

[14]  P. Wood,et al.  The study of intraindividual differences by means of dynamic factor models: Rationale, implementation, and interpretation. , 1994 .

[15]  Peter C. M. Molenaar,et al.  A dynamic factor model for the analysis of multivariate time series , 1985 .

[16]  A R McIntosh,et al.  Frontotemporal interactions in face encoding and recognition. , 1999, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[17]  Barry Horwitz,et al.  Covariance Analysis of Functional Interactions in the Brain Using Metabolic and Blood Flow Data , 1992 .

[18]  G. Orban,et al.  Response latencies of visual cells in macaque areas V1, V2 and V5 , 1989, Brain Research.

[19]  R. Hoyle,et al.  Pooling Lagged Covariance Structures Based on Short, Multivariate Time Series for Dynamic Factor Analysis , 1999 .

[20]  Lester Melie-García,et al.  Estimating brain functional connectivity with sparse multivariate autoregression , 2005, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[21]  Barry Horwitz,et al.  The elusive concept of brain connectivity , 2003, NeuroImage.

[22]  Lynn Hasher,et al.  Working Memory, Comprehension, and Aging: A Review and a New View , 1988 .

[23]  G. Orban,et al.  Visual Motion Processing Investigated Using Contrast Agent-Enhanced fMRI in Awake Behaving Monkeys , 2001, Neuron.

[24]  E. Formisano,et al.  Functional connectivity as revealed by spatial independent component analysis of fMRI measurements during rest , 2004, Human brain mapping.

[25]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Multivariate Autoregressive Modelling of fMRI time series , 2003 .

[26]  H. J. Eysenck,et al.  Advances in psychophysiology: J.R. Jennings, P.K. Ackles & M.G.H. Coles (Eds) Vol.5 (1993).320 pp. £42.50 (hardback). ISBN 185302 191 1 , 1994 .

[27]  J. Cerella,et al.  Aging, executive control, and attention: a review of meta-analyses , 2002, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews.

[28]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Time‐dependent changes in effective connectivity measured with PET , 1993 .

[29]  Theodore A. Walls,et al.  Models for intensive longitudinal data , 2006 .

[30]  G. Gratton,et al.  Shedding light on brain function: the event-related optical signal , 2001, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[31]  Y Kano,et al.  Can test statistics in covariance structure analysis be trusted? , 1992, Psychological bulletin.

[32]  F. Gonzalez-Lima,et al.  Structural equation modeling and its application to network analysis in functional brain imaging , 1994 .

[33]  M. Lowe,et al.  Functional Connectivity in Single and Multislice Echoplanar Imaging Using Resting-State Fluctuations , 1998, NeuroImage.

[34]  R. P. McDonald,et al.  Principles and practice in reporting structural equation analyses. , 2002, Psychological methods.

[35]  G. Gratton,et al.  Feasibility of intracranial near-infrared optical scanning. , 1994, Psychophysiology.

[36]  Monica Fabiani,et al.  The event-related optical signal (EROS) in visual cortex: replicability, consistency, localization, and resolution. , 2003, Psychophysiology.

[37]  A. Anderson,et al.  An fMRI study of stroop word-color interference: evidence for cingulate subregions subserving multiple distributed attentional systems , 1999, Biological Psychiatry.

[38]  P T Fox,et al.  Structure--function spatial covariance in the human visual cortex. , 2001, Cerebral cortex.

[39]  Henning Scheich,et al.  Advances in metabolic mapping techniques for brain imaging of behavioral and learning functions , 1992 .

[40]  Michael Eichler,et al.  A graphical approach for evaluating effective connectivity in neural systems , 2005, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[41]  Aapo Hyvärinen,et al.  Independent component analysis of fMRI group studies by self-organizing clustering , 2005, NeuroImage.

[42]  H Preißl,et al.  Dynamics of activity and connectivity in physiological neuronal networks , 1991 .

[43]  R. West,et al.  An application of prefrontal cortex function theory to cognitive aging. , 1996, Psychological bulletin.

[44]  Rainer Goebel,et al.  Mapping directed influence over the brain using Granger causality and fMRI , 2005, NeuroImage.

[45]  M. Hallett Transcranial magnetic stimulation and the human brain , 2000, Nature.

[46]  Jonathan D. Cohen,et al.  Anterior cingulate and prefrontal cortex: who's in control? , 2000, Nature Neuroscience.

[47]  Paul M. Corballis,et al.  Toward Noninvasive 3-D Imaging of the Time Course of Cortical Activity: Investigation of the Depth of the Event-Related Optical Signal , 2000, NeuroImage.

[48]  Martin Wolf,et al.  Detecting cerebral functional slow and fast signals by frequency-domain near-infrared spectroscopy using two different sensors , 2000 .

[49]  A.C. Evans,et al.  Connectivity of anatomical and functional MRI data , 2005, Proceedings. 2005 IEEE International Joint Conference on Neural Networks, 2005..

[50]  Monica Fabiani,et al.  When in Doubt, Do it Both Ways: Brain Evidence of the Simultaneous Activation of Conflicting Motor Responses in a Spatial Stroop Task , 2001, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[51]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Functional Connectivity: The Principal-Component Analysis of Large (PET) Data Sets , 1993, Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism.

[52]  P. Molenaar,et al.  Dynamic Factor Analysis of Psychophysiological Signals , 1994 .

[53]  Sadanori Konishi,et al.  Model evaluation and information criteria in covariance structure analysis , 1999 .

[54]  F. N. Dempster,et al.  The rise and fall of the inhibitory mechanism: Toward a unified theory of cognitive development and aging , 1992 .

[55]  Lee M. Miller,et al.  Measuring interregional functional connectivity using coherence and partial coherence analyses of fMRI data , 2004, NeuroImage.

[56]  R. P. McDonald,et al.  Some algebraic properties of the Reticular Action Model for moment structures. , 1984, The British journal of mathematical and statistical psychology.

[57]  Deborah A. Hall,et al.  Connectivity analysis with structural equation modelling: an example of the effects of voxel selection , 2003, NeuroImage.

[58]  M. Corbetta,et al.  Control of goal-directed and stimulus-driven attention in the brain , 2002, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[59]  J Romaya,et al.  The timing of visual evoked potential activity in human area V4 , 1994, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[60]  B. Biswal,et al.  Functional connectivity in the motor cortex of resting human brain using echo‐planar mri , 1995, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[61]  R. Hoyle Statistical Strategies for Small Sample Research , 1999 .

[62]  Roderick P McDonald,et al.  The Specific Analysis of Structural Equation Models , 2004, Multivariate behavioral research.

[63]  Andrea Mechelli,et al.  A report of the functional connectivity workshop, Dusseldorf 2002 , 2003, NeuroImage.

[64]  Anthony R. McIntosh,et al.  Measuring dynamic connectivity in eyeblink conditioning: A panel analysis , 2000, NeuroImage.