Interdisciplinary knowledge integration through group model building: recognizing dualities and triadizing the conversation

Abstract As part of the inquiry into managing an interdisciplinary research process on adaptive water governance, we investigated the process of group model building (GMB) and, more specifically, the role of Unified Modeling Language (UML) in this process. An analysis of group interaction reveals several tensions in the process of knowledge integration, which can be grouped into three overarching dualities: ‘simplicity versus complexity’, ‘constraining versus containing’ and ‘defining versus refining’. As group members take different positions with regard to these dualities, these represent sources of tension and potential ‘stuckness’ of the GMB. Hence the question arises how the group can manage duality in ways that take the GMB beyond its opposing forces. We suggest that knowledge integration processes may benefit from early recognition of the dualities at hand and strategies aimed at creating ‘thirdness’, including some suggestions on the concrete forms such ‘thirdness’ may take.

[1]  N. Denzin,et al.  Strategies Of Qualitative Inquiry , 2012 .

[2]  T. Ringer,et al.  Group Action: The Dynamics of Groups in Therapeutic, Educational and Corporate Settings , 2002 .

[3]  Jac A. M. Vennix,et al.  Group model-building: tackling messy problems , 1999 .

[4]  Roland W. Scholz,et al.  Ambiguities in decision-oriented Life Cycle Inventories The Role of mental models , 2002 .

[5]  A. Strauss,et al.  Grounded theory methodology: An overview. , 1994 .

[6]  N. Brown,et al.  The Role of Informal Protected Areas in Maintaining Biodiversity in the Western Ghats of India , 2005 .

[7]  A. Akera.  Constructing a Representation for an Ecology of Knowledge , 2007 .

[8]  C. Pohl,et al.  Handbook of transdisciplinary research , 2008 .

[9]  Etienne Wenger,et al.  Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning, and Identity , 1998 .

[10]  A. Strauss,et al.  The Discovery of Grounded Theory , 1967 .

[11]  Charles Hampden-Turner.  Charting the corporate mind : graphic solutions to business conflicts , 1990 .

[12]  Claudia Pahl-Wostl,et al.  Research, part of a Special Feature on New Methods for Adaptive Water Management A Framing Approach to Cross-disciplinary Research Collaboration: Experiences from a Large-scale Research Project on Adaptive Water Management , 2007 .

[13]  Austin Henderson,et al.  Interaction Analysis: Foundations and Practice , 1995 .

[14]  George P. Richardson,et al.  Teamwork in group model building , 1995 .

[15]  Art Dewulf,et al.  Integrating knowledge accross disciplines. Experiences from the NeWater project , 2008 .

[16]  George P. Richardson,et al.  Scripts for group model building , 1997 .

[17]  George P. Richardson,et al.  Group model building: problem structuring, policy simulation and decision support , 2007, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[18]  W. Bennis,et al.  A Theory of Group Development , 1956 .

[19]  Deana Pennington,et al.  Cross-Disciplinary Collaboration and Learning , 2008 .

[20]  G. Cundill,et al.  Foghorns to the Future: Using Knowledge and Transdisciplinarity to Navigate Complex Systems , 2005 .

[21]  Chris Steyaert,et al.  The world in two and a third way out? The concept of duality in organization theory and practice , 1999 .

[22]  T. Hels,et al.  Barriers and facilitators to integration among scientists in transdisciplinary landscape analyses: a cross-country comparison , 2004 .

[23]  B. Glaser.  Theoretical Sensitivity: Advances in the Methodology of Grounded Theory , 1978 .

[24]  Georg Holtz,et al.  The NeWater Management and Transition Framework — state and development process — , 2008 .

[25]  Barry Newell,et al.  A conceptual template for integrative human–environment research , 2005 .

[26]  Karin E. Hindenlang,et al.  Sustainable Coexistence of Ungulates and Trees: A Stakeholder Platform for Resource Use Negotiations , 2008 .

[27]  N. Denzin,et al.  Handbook of Qualitative Research , 1994 .