Ethos: A confounding element in communication research

[1]  Theodore M. Newcomb,et al.  Personality and social change , 1943 .

[2]  H. Stevenson,et al.  ADULT PERFORMANCE AS A FUNCTION OF SEX OF EXPERIMENTER AND SEX OF SUBJECT. , 1964, Journal of abnormal psychology.

[3]  Carl I. Hovland,et al.  Reconciling conflicting results derived from experimental and survey studies of attitude change. , 1959 .

[4]  T. Newcomb.  An approach to the study of communicative acts. , 1953, Psychological review.

[5]  F. Heider.  Attitudes and cognitive organization. , 1946, The Journal of psychology.

[6]  R. Rosenthal.  Experimenter attributes as determinants of subjects' responses. , 1963, Journal of projective techniques.

[7]  C. Osgood,et al.  The principle of congruity in the prediction of attitude change. , 1955, Psychological review.

[8]  Howard Gilkinson,et al.  Effects of order and authority in an argumentative speech , 1954 .

[9]  Kenneth E. Andersen,et al.  A summary of experimental research in ethos , 1963 .

[10]  R. Cathcart.  An experimental study of the relative effectiveness of four methods of presenting evidence , 1955 .

[11]  F. Mcguigan.  The experimenter: A neglected stimulus object. , 1963 .

[12]  R. Rosenthal,et al.  EMPHASIS ON EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURE, SEX OF SUBJECTS AND THE BIASING EFFECTS OF EXPERIMENTAL HYPOTHESES. , 1964, Journal of projective techniques & personality assessment.

[13]  N. Maccoby,et al.  HOMEOSTATIC THEORY IN ATTITUDE CHANGE , 1961 .

[14]  S. Asch,et al.  The doctrine of suggestion, prestige and imitation in social psychology. , 1948, Psychological review.

[15]  Robert Rosenthal,et al.  Psychology of the Scientist: V. Three Experiments in Experimenter Bias , 1963 .

[16]  L. Festinger,et al.  A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance , 2017 .

[17]  Effects of “satisfactory” and “unsatisfactory” evidence in a speech of advocacy , 1963 .