Incidental findings on brain magnetic resonance imaging: systematic review and meta-analysis

Objective To quantify the prevalence of incidental findings on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the brain. Design Systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies. Data sources Ovid Medline (1950 to May 2008), Embase (1980 to May 2008), and bibliographies of relevant articles. Review methods Two reviewers sought and assessed studies of people without neurological symptoms who underwent MRI of the brain with or without intravenous contrast for research purposes or for occupational, clinical, or commercial screening. Main outcome measures Overall disease specific and age specific prevalence of incidental brain findings, calculated by meta-analysis of pooled proportions using DerSimonian-Laird weights in a random effects model. Results In 16 studies, 135 of 19 559 people had neoplastic incidental brain findings (prevalence 0.70%, 95% confidence interval 0.47% to 0.98%), and prevalence increased with age (χ2 for linear trend, P=0.003). In 15 studies, 375 of 15 559 people had non-neoplastic incidental brain findings (prevalence 2.0%, 1.1% to 3.1%, excluding white matter hyperintensities, silent infarcts, and microbleeds). The number of asymptomatic people needed to scan to detect any incidental brain finding was 37. The prevalence of incidental brain findings was higher in studies using high resolution MRI sequences than in those using standard resolution sequences (4.3% v 1.7%, P<0.001). The prevalence of neoplastic incidental brain findings increased with age. Conclusions Incidental findings on brain MRI are common, prevalence increases with age, and detection is more likely using high resolution MRI sequences than standard resolution sequences. These findings deserve to be mentioned when obtaining informed consent for brain MRI in research and clinical practice but are not sufficient to justify screening healthy asymptomatic people.

[1]  I. Wilkinson,et al.  The high incidence and bioethics of findings on magnetic resonance brain imaging of normal volunteers for neuroscience research , 2009, Journal of Medical Ethics.

[2]  L. Irwig,et al.  Communicating about screening , 2008, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[3]  Chris L. Peterson,et al.  The U.S. Health Care Spending: Comparison With Other OECD Countries , 2008 .

[4]  D. Seixas,et al.  Ethics in fMRI Studies* , 2008, Clinical Neuroradiology.

[5]  Frances P Lawrenz,et al.  Managing Incidental Findings in Human Subjects Research: Analysis and Recommendations , 2008, The Journal of law, medicine & ethics : a journal of the American Society of Law, Medicine & Ethics.

[6]  E. Connolly,et al.  Brain magnetic resonance imaging scans for asymptomatic patients: role in medical screening. , 2008, Mayo Clinic proceedings.

[7]  C. Warlow,et al.  Outcome after interventional or conservative management of unruptured brain arteriovenous malformations: a prospective, population-based cohort study , 2008, The Lancet Neurology.

[8]  P. Bandettini,et al.  Practical approaches to incidental findings in brain imaging research , 2008, Neurology.

[9]  J. Wardlaw,et al.  Spontaneous brain microbleeds: systematic review, subgroup analyses and standards for study design and reporting. , 2007, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[10]  P. Koudstaal,et al.  Silent brain infarcts: a systematic review , 2007, The Lancet Neurology.

[11]  C. Warlow,et al.  Screening using whole-body magnetic resonance imaging scanning: who wants an incidentaloma? , 2007, Journal of medical screening.

[12]  J. Kuratsu,et al.  Indications for surgery in patients with asymptomatic meningiomas based on an extensive experience. , 2006, Journal of neurosurgery.

[13]  David Schiff,et al.  Low-grade gliomas: an update on pathology and therapy , 2005, The Lancet Neurology.

[14]  A. Dowson,et al.  Are investigations anxiolytic or anxiogenic? A randomised controlled trial of neuroimaging to provide reassurance in chronic daily headache , 2005, Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry.

[15]  J. Pickard,et al.  Guidelines reduce the risk of brain-scan shock , 2005, Nature.

[16]  S. Miller,et al.  DNA barcoding a useful tool for taxonomists , 2005, Nature.

[17]  T. Raffin,et al.  Advertising, patient decision making, and self-referral for computed tomographic and magnetic resonance imaging. , 2004, Archives of internal medicine.

[18]  B. Dimitrov,et al.  Treatment of Unruptured Cerebral Aneurysms by Embolization with Guglielmi Detachable Coils: Case-fatality, Morbidity, and Effectiveness in Preventing Bleeding—A Systematic Review of the Literature , 2004, Neurosurgery.

[19]  J. Piatt Unexpected findings on brain and spine imaging in children. , 2004, Pediatric clinics of North America.

[20]  A. Mamourian Incidental findings on research functional MR images: Should we look? , 2004, AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology.

[21]  F. Weber,et al.  Cranial MRI as a screening tool: findings in 1,772 military pilot applicants. , 2004, Aviation, space, and environmental medicine.

[22]  D. Nichols,et al.  Unruptured intracranial aneurysms: natural history, clinical outcome, and risks of surgical and endovascular treatment , 2003, The Lancet.

[23]  J. Debatin,et al.  [Prevention without radiation--a strategy for comprehensive early detection using magnetic resonance tomography]. , 2002, Der Radiologe.

[24]  C Caroselli,et al.  Recommendations for the management of patients with unruptured intracranial aneurysms: A statement for healthcare professionals from the Stroke Council of the American Heart Association. , 2000, Circulation.

[25]  C Caroselli,et al.  Recommendations for the Management of Patients With Unruptured Intracranial Aneurysms: A Statement for Healthcare Professionals From the Stroke Council of the American Heart Association , 2000, Stroke.

[26]  M. Kraut,et al.  Asymptomatic Chiari Type I malformations identified on magnetic resonance imaging. , 2000, Journal of neurosurgery.

[27]  Y. Yoshimoto,et al.  Cost-effectiveness analysis of screening for asymptomatic, unruptured intracranial aneurysms. A mathematical model. , 1999, Stroke.

[28]  H. Abe,et al.  Magnetic resonance images reveal a high incidence of asymptomatic pineal cysts in young women. , 1995, Neurosurgery.

[29]  Teri,et al.  A method for using MR to evaluate the effects of cardiovascular disease on the brain: the cardiovascular health study. , 1994, AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology.

[30]  N. Laird,et al.  Meta-analysis in clinical trials. , 1986, Controlled clinical trials.

[31]  Anna L Harvey The Congress , 1887, The Dental register.