Using fuzzy multiple criterion methods for fourth party logistics criteria selection

Fourth party logistics (4PL) company plays the role of integrator, which provides both information technology and supply chain integration capabilities. It not only creates different values of each segment in the supply chain, but also elevates the effects in supply chain management for business. Therefore, how to select an appropriate fourth party logistics company is an important decision for business. Nonetheless, the fourth party logistics is a significant and new issue. Actually, there are not any fourth party logistics companies in the world presently. The purpose of this study is to figure out the evaluation factors and their weights to aid the selection of 4PL for businesses. The primary criteria to evaluate 4PL are established by the literature survey with Fuzzy Delphi Method (FDM), and then Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process (FAHP) is employed to calculate the weights of these criteria, so as to build the Fuzzy Multi-criteria model of 4PL. According to experts' estimations, the most important criteria of the evaluation model about selecting the fourth party logistics company contain sixteen items. In sum, we hope the criteria of the evaluation model to the fourth party logistics company will be able to offer references for industrial circles.

[1]  R. Sohi,et al.  IT competency and firm performance: is organizational learning a missing link? , 2003 .

[2]  S. Hertz,et al.  Strategic development of third party logistics providers , 2003 .

[3]  M. Frohlich,et al.  Arcs of integration: an international study of supply chain strategies , 2001 .

[4]  Ingoo Han,et al.  Performance measure of information systems (IS) in evolving computing environments: an empirical investigation , 2003, Inf. Manag..

[5]  Edward A. Morash,et al.  THE ROLE OF TRANSPORTATION CAPABILITIES IN INTERNATIONAL SUPPLY CHAIN MANAGEMENT , 1997 .

[6]  Qiang Tu,et al.  A path analytic study of the effect of top management support for information systems performance , 2004 .

[7]  Gary Klein,et al.  IS service performance: self-perceptions and user perceptions , 2001, Inf. Manag..

[8]  Ephraim R. McLean,et al.  The DeLone and McLean Model of Information Systems Success: A Ten-Year Update , 2003, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[9]  Ioannis E. Tsolas,et al.  Sustainable construction and drivers of change in Greece: a Delphi study , 2006 .

[10]  T. Saaty,et al.  The Analytic Hierarchy Process , 1985 .

[11]  A. Ishikawa,et al.  The Max-Min Delphi method and fuzzy Delphi method via fuzzy integration , 1993 .

[12]  E. Morash,et al.  Supply Chain Integration: Customer Value through Collaborative Closeness versus Operational Excellence , 1998 .

[13]  Ching-Lai Hwang,et al.  Group decision making under multiple criteria , 1987 .

[14]  Stephen M. Gilbert,et al.  New managerial challenges from supply chain opportunities , 2000 .

[15]  Sengun Yeniyurt,et al.  THE IMPACT OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY ON SUPPLY CHAIN CAPABILITIES AND FIRM PERFORMANCE: A RESOURCE-BASED VIEW , 2006 .

[16]  R. Narasimhan,et al.  Effect of supply chain integration on the relationship between diversification and performance: evidence from Japanese and Korean firms , 2002 .

[17]  Jao-Hong Cheng,et al.  Using Fuzzy Analytical Hierarchy Process for Multi-criteria Evaluation Model of High-yield Bonds Investment , 2006, 2006 IEEE International Conference on Fuzzy Systems.

[18]  J. Buckley,et al.  Fuzzy hierarchical analysis , 1999, FUZZ-IEEE'99. 1999 IEEE International Fuzzy Systems. Conference Proceedings (Cat. No.99CH36315).

[19]  John Gattorna,et al.  Strategic supply chain alignment : best practice in supply chain management , 1998 .

[20]  George J. Klir,et al.  Fuzzy sets and fuzzy logic - theory and applications , 1995 .