Treatment of open tibial fractures with the Orthofix fixator.

External fixation is considered the treatment of choice for severe open tibial fractures. A prospective study was designed to evaluate the use of the Orthofix Dynamic Axial Fixator (DAF) for the short- and long-term treatment of open tibial fractures. Forty-four patients with 45 open tibial fractures were enrolled in the study, which included a one-year follow-up period. Eighty-nine percent of the fractures were classified as Gustilo and Anderson's Type III. All fractures except one were united in a mean healing time of 22.6 weeks. The dynamization of the Orthofix in nonsegmental fractures occurred at an average of 8.1 weeks. Segmental fractures received a two-stage dynamization. The first stage consisted of removing the supplementary pins, once callus formation was seen at one of the fractures lines, plus the addition of a bone graft. This stage occurred at an average of 8.8 weeks. The second stage consisted of unlocking the telescoping rods and allowing dynamic axial loading of the consolidating graft. This stage occurred at an average of 19.0 weeks. The implementation of this one-plane unilateral frame, which is capable of converting from a rigid to a dynamic fixator, combined with a bone graft in 58% of the patients, contributed to a 98% success rate. Proper timing of dynamization is emphasized to avoid angulation, nonunion, or delayed union.

[1]  F. Behrens,et al.  External fixation of the tibia. Basic concepts and prospective evaluation. , 1986, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[2]  D. N. Williams,et al.  The use of antibiotics in the management of open fractures. , 1984, Orthopedics.

[3]  G. Bastiani,et al.  The treatment of fractures with a dynamic axial fixator. , 1984, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[4]  L. Lanyon,et al.  Regulation of bone formation by applied dynamic loads. , 1984, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[5]  L E Lanyon,et al.  Static vs dynamic loads as an influence on bone remodelling. , 1984, Journal of biomechanics.

[6]  F. Behrens,et al.  Unilateral external fixation for severe open tibial fractures. Preliminary report of a prospective study. , 1983, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[7]  T. Moore,et al.  Considerations in reducing the infection rate in open tibial fractures. , 1983, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[8]  C. Edwards Staged reconstruction of complex open tibial fractures using Hoffmann external fixation. Clinical decisions and dilemmas. , 1983, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[9]  T. Moore,et al.  Use of antibiotics in open tibial fractures. , 1983, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[10]  C. Rorabeck,et al.  Fractures of the tibia treated by flexible external fixation. , 1983, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[11]  N. Kovacevic,et al.  Bending stiffness of unilateral and bilateral fixator frames. , 1983, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[12]  L. Claes,et al.  Treatment by external fixation of open fractures associated with severe soft tissue damage of the leg. Biomechanical principles and clinical experience. , 1983, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[13]  G. Cierny,et al.  The Management of Open Tibial Fractures with Associated Soft‐Tissue Loss: External Pin Fixation with Early Flap Coverage , 1981, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[14]  R. Gustilo,et al.  OTD classic article review - Gustillo RB, Anderson JT (1976) Prevention of infection in the treatment of one thousand and twenty-five open fractures of long bones: retrospective and prospective analyses , 2002, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[15]  J. Trueta,et al.  Blood supply and the rate of healing of tibial fractures. , 1974, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.