Inkjet printed wireless biosensors on stretchable substrate

Wireless biosensors are suited for long-term monitoring of physiological signals. Inkjet printing wireless biosensors on stretchable substrate can be used to realize small and lightweight body monitoring devices. Current conductive inks have low processing temperature which makes it possible to use substrate materials with low temperature resistance. Conductive inks offer sufficient performance for realizing antennas and interconnections between components. In this work, we use thermoplastic polyurethane as the printing substrate. The inkjet printed conductors on polyurethane tolerate only moderate stretching. Despite the weak stretchability, polyurethane is a favorable option in realizing wireless biosensors since even modest stretching enables the biosensor to conform to the human body. The dielectric properties of the polyurethane were characterized using coplanar waveguides (CPW). The determined permittivity of the substrate is 3.2 and the loss tangent is 0.1. Due to high loss tangent CPW lines on polyurethane are much lossier at high frequencies than lines at PEN substrate. The performance of the sensor on PEN is studied with measurements and the antenna performance on polyurethane is investigated using simulations. The measured reading range of the sensor realized on PEN substrate at 300 μm distance from the body was 14 m. According to simulations changing to the lossy polyurethane substrate would not affect the performance of the sensors' antenna.

[1]  Tiiti Kellomaki,et al.  Magnetic and electric antennas close to the body , 2013, 2013 IEEE Antennas and Propagation Society International Symposium (APSURSI).

[2]  R. Marks A multiline method of network analyzer calibration , 1991 .

[3]  V. Pynttari,et al.  RF Design for Inkjet Technology: Antenna Geometries and Layer Thickness Optimization , 2012, IEEE Antennas and Wireless Propagation Letters.

[4]  A.J. Walton,et al.  Sheet resistance measurement of non-standard cleanroom materials using suspended Greek cross test structures , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Semiconductor Manufacturing.

[5]  Ulrich S. Schubert,et al.  Alternative sintering methods compared to conventional thermal sintering for inkjet printed silver nanoparticle ink , 2014 .

[6]  Riku Makinen,et al.  Application of a multiline material characterization method to inkjet printed electronics , 2014 .

[7]  H. Saito,et al.  Evaluation of Inkjet Technology for Electronic Packaging and System Integration , 2007, 2007 Proceedings 57th Electronic Components and Technology Conference.

[8]  Geng Yang,et al.  Heterogeneous Integration of Bio-Sensing System-on-Chip and Printed Electronics , 2012, IEEE Journal on Emerging and Selected Topics in Circuits and Systems.

[9]  B. Nauwelaers,et al.  Accurate transmission line characterisation on high and low-resistivity substrates , 2001 .

[10]  M. Mantysalo,et al.  Inkjet printed flexible user interface module , 2012, 2012 IEEE 62nd Electronic Components and Technology Conference.

[11]  Tiiti Kellomaki,et al.  Body Effects on Thin Single-Layer Slot, Self-Complementary, and Wire Antennas , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation.

[12]  Li Xie,et al.  System integration of smart packages using printed electronics , 2012, 2012 IEEE 62nd Electronic Components and Technology Conference.

[13]  Riku Makinen,et al.  RADIO INTERFACE DESIGN FOR INKJET-PRINTED BIOSENSOR APPLICATIONS , 2013 .

[14]  J. Vanfleteren,et al.  Stretchable electronic systems , 2006, 2006 8th Electronics Packaging Technology Conference.

[15]  Toni Liimatta,et al.  Inkjet printing in manufacturing of stretchable interconnects , 2014, 2014 IEEE 64th Electronic Components and Technology Conference (ECTC).