Complexity of movement preparation and the spatiotemporal coupling of bimanual reach-to-grasp movements

There is a movement preparation cost for bimanual asymmetric reaching movements compared to bimanual symmetric movements. This is likely caused by the complex spatiotemporal coupling of bimanual asymmetric movements. The spatiotemporal coupling of bimanual reach-to-grasp movements has been investigated, but not the potential movement preparation costs. The purpose of the present study was to investigate the relationship between movement preparation costs and spatiotemporal coupling of reach-to-grasp movements. Twenty-four participants made unimanual, bimanual symmetric, and bimanual asymmetric reach-to-grasp movements in four-choice reaction time tasks. There was a movement preparation cost for bimanual symmetric reach-to-grasp movements compared to unimanual movements, which was not previously seen for reaching movements. Coordinating two symmetric grasps probably caused this bimanual symmetric cost, as we have previously shown that there is no bimanual symmetric cost for reaching movements. It was also surprising that the complexity of movement preparation was comparable for bimanual symmetric and asymmetric reach-to-grasp movements. However, the spatial coupling of bimanual asymmetric movements at movement initiation suggested that they were prepared as bimanual symmetric movements. Online control was then used to modify these symmetric reach-to-grasp movements into asymmetric movements. Preparing bimanual symmetric reach-to-grasp movements in advance instead of asymmetric movements likely prevented a bimanual asymmetric cost.

[1]  M. Smyth,et al.  Asynchrony in discrete bimanual aiming: Evidence for visual strategies of coordination , 2012, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[2]  Romeo Chua,et al.  Comparing movement preparation of unimanual, bimanual symmetric, and bimanual asymmetric movements , 2013, Experimental Brain Research.

[3]  R. C. Oldfield.  The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. , 1971, Neuropsychologia.

[4]  Kenneth F. Valyear,et al.  Decoding Action Intentions from Preparatory Brain Activity in Human Parieto-Frontal Networks , 2011, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[5]  H. Freund,et al.  Different coupling for the reach and grasp components in bimanual prehension movements , 2000, Neuroreport.

[6]  Carol A. Putnam,et al.  On the Space-Time Structure of Human Interlimb Co-Ordination , 1983, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[7]  M. Jeannerod,et al.  Prehension Movements: The Visuomotor Channels Hypothesis Revisited , 1996 .

[8]  S. Riek,et al.  Bimanual aiming and overt attention: one law for two hands , 2003, Experimental Brain Research.

[9]  S. Jackson,et al.  Attention for action: coordinating bimanual reach-to-grasp movements. , 1999, British journal of psychology.

[10]  Jody C Culham,et al.  Behavioral / Systems / Cognitive Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Reveals the Neural Substrates of Arm Transport and Grip Formation in Reach-to-Grasp Actions in Humans , 2010 .

[11]  M. Jeannerod.  Intersegmental coordination during reaching at natural visual objects , 1981 .

[12]  D Goodman,et al.  On the coordination of two-handed movements. , 1979, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[13]  C. MacKenzie,et al.  Bimanual Movement Control: Information processing and Interaction Effects , 1984 .

[14]  Jody C. Culham,et al.  Human neuroimaging reveals the subcomponents of grasping, reaching and pointing actions , 2018, Cortex.

[15]  Andrea H Mason,et al.  Manual asymmetries in bimanual prehension tasks: manipulation of object size and object distance. , 2009, Human movement science.

[16]  Lutz Jäncke,et al.  Bimanual versus unimanual coordination: what makes the difference? , 2004, NeuroImage.

[17]  H. Honda,et al.  Rightward Superiority of Eye Movements in a Bimanual Aiming Task , 1982, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[18]  S. Swinnen.  Intermanual coordination: From behavioural principles to neural-network interactions , 2002, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[19]  Jody C. Culham,et al.  Neural correlates of object size and object location during grasping actions , 2015, The European journal of neuroscience.

[20]  Umberto Castiello,et al.  The bilateral reach to grasp movement , 1993, Behavioural Brain Research.

[21]  F. M. Henry,et al.  Increased Response Latency for Complicated Movements and A “Memory Drum” Theory of Neuromotor Reaction , 1960 .

[22]  Eric A Roy,et al.  Using hand performance measures to predict handedness , 2006, Laterality.

[23]  Geoffrey P. Bingham,et al.  The coordination patterns observed when two hands reach-to-grasp separate objects , 2007, Experimental Brain Research.

[24]  P. Fitts,et al.  INFORMATION CAPACITY OF DISCRETE MOTOR RESPONSES. , 1964, Journal of experimental psychology.

[25]  Richard D. Morey,et al.  Confidence Intervals from Normalized Data: A correction to Cousineau (2005) , 2008 .

[26]  Denis Cousineau,et al.  Confidence intervals in within-subject designs: A simpler solution to Loftus and Masson's method , 2005 .

[27]  Claudia L. R. Gonzalez,et al.  Hand use for grasping in a bimanual task: evidence for different roles? , 2012, Experimental Brain Research.

[28]  F. Donders.  On the speed of mental processes. , 1969, Acta psychologica.

[29]  Stuart T Klapp,et al.  Reaction Time Analysis of Two Types of Motor Preparation for Speech Articulation: Action as a Sequence of Chunks , 2003, Journal of motor behavior.

[30]  B. Martin,et al.  Eye–hand coordination of symmetric bimanual reaching tasks: temporal aspects , 2010, Experimental Brain Research.

[31]  Eli Brenner,et al.  Robust movement segmentation by combining multiple sources of information , 2010, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[32]  H. Huynh,et al.  Estimation of the Box Correction for Degrees of Freedom from Sample Data in Randomized Block and Split-Plot Designs , 1976 .