Evaluation of Vacuum Assisted Closure Therapy for Soft Tissue Injury in Open Musculoskeletal Trauma.

INTRODUCTION The application of controlled levels of negative or sub atmospheric pressure for a prolonged period of time on a wound had shown to accelerate removal of excess fluid and promote hyperaemia, which eventually promote wound healing. AIM The study was conducted with the aim to evaluate the effectiveness of Vacuum Assisted Closure (VAC) therapy for soft tissue injury in open musculoskeletal trauma. MATERIALS AND METHODS Twenty cases of complex musculoskeletal wound involving different parts of body were included in this progressive randomized study. In patients, aggressive debridement was done before the application of VAC therapy. Controlled negative pressure was uniformly applied to the wound. Dressings were changed after every 4 to 5 days. The evaluation of results included healing rate of the wound, eradication of infection, complication rate, and number of secondary procedures. RESULTS VAC therapy over the wound was administered for an average of 20.4 days ±6.72 days (range 14 to 42 days). There was decrease in wound size attained by VAC therapy ranged from 2.6 to 24.4cm(2), with an average reduction of 10.55 cm(2). Three wounds were infected at the start of VAC therapy. However, all patients were cleared of bacterial infection by the end of VAC therapy. CONCLUSION VAC therapy using negative pressure promote Wound healing by increasing local capillary perfusion and increased rate of granulation tissue formation, decreases the duration of wound healing and requires fewer painful dressing change.

[1]  E. A. Nelson,et al.  A systematic review of topical negative pressure therapy for acute and chronic wounds , 2008, The British journal of surgery.

[2]  G. Maddern,et al.  The safety and efficacy of topical negative pressure in non-healing wounds: a systematic review. , 2006, Journal of wound care.

[3]  J. Molnar,et al.  Subatmospheric pressure wound therapy and the vacuum-assisted closure device: basic science and current clinical successes , 2006, Expert review of medical devices.

[4]  A. Deva,et al.  Topical negative pressure in wound management , 2000, The Medical journal of Australia.

[5]  T E Philbeck,et al.  The clinical and cost effectiveness of externally applied negative pressure wound therapy in the treatment of wounds in home healthcare Medicare patients. , 1999, Ostomy/wound management.

[6]  L. Argenta,et al.  Vacuum‐Assisted Closure: A New Method for Wound Control and Treatment: Animal Studies and Basic Foundation , 1997, Annals of plastic surgery.

[7]  L. Kinzl,et al.  [Vacuum sealing as treatment of soft tissue damage in open fractures]. , 1993, Der Unfallchirurg.

[8]  P. Scott,et al.  The effect of mechanical stress on soft and hard tissue repair; a review. , 1988, British journal of plastic surgery.

[9]  N. Smith The benefits of VAC therapy in the management of pressure ulcers. , 2004, British journal of nursing.

[10]  L. Téot,et al.  Topical negative pressure (TNP): the evolution of a novel wound therapy. , 2003, Journal of wound care.

[11]  S. McCallon,et al.  Vacuum-assisted closure versus saline-moistened gauze in the healing of postoperative diabetic foot wounds. , 2000, Ostomy/wound management.