Students' Experience in a General Chemistry Cooperative Problem Based Laboratory

Most educators and scientists would agree that science laboratory instruction has the potential of developing science practices fundamental to achieving scientific literacy. However, there is scant evidence to support that this potential is realized, particularly in tertiary level education. This paper reports qualitative results from a sequential explanatory mixed methods study aimed at investigating the effectiveness of a college, cooperative, project-based General Chemistry Laboratory in promoting student learning. Quantitative findings showed that students in this programme increased their ability and metacognitive strategies in solving online ill-structured chemistry problems. For the current study, we used a phenomenological approach to investigate the essence of students' experiences in this learning environment. Eleven participants volunteered to take part in in-depth, open-ended interviews. Phenomenological data reduction, analysis and interpretation produced an outcome space composed of three dimensions (Affective Response, Understanding of the Learning Experience, and Strategic Response). The need to ‘take charge of learning’ emerged as the interconnecting factor bringing cohesiveness to the experience. These findings are consistent with the previous quantitative report. Additionally, they support the notion that immersion in a lab environment appropriately designed to constantly challenge students to think through problems and figure out solutions does indeed promote metacognition and problem solving skills. Situating learning in this context facilitates meaningful self-discovery and internalization of strategies as opposed to externally introducing them. We believe that these findings contribute evidence of the relationship between experiences in the laboratory and student effective learning and can inform and guide curricular development.

[1]  John W. Creswell,et al.  Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches , 2010 .

[2]  M. Patton.  Qualitative research and evaluation methods , 1980 .

[3]  Avi Hofstein,et al.  The Role of the Laboratory in Science Teaching: Neglected Aspects of Research , 1982 .

[4]  Paul A. Kirschner,et al.  The laboratory in higher science education: Problems, premises and objectives , 1988 .

[5]  J. J. Lagowski.  Entry-level science courses: The weak link , 1990 .

[6]  Kenneth Tobin,et al.  Research on Science Laboratory Activities: In Pursuit of Better Questions and Answers to Improve Learning , 1990 .

[7]  R. Hambleton,et al.  Fundamentals of Item Response Theory , 1991 .

[8]  C. Moustakas.  Phenomenological Research Methods , 1994 .

[9]  Melanie M. Cooper.  Cooperative Chemistry Laboratories , 1994 .

[10]  D. Hodson.  Laboratory work as scientific method: three decades of confusion and distortion , 1996 .

[11]  Leonard Springer,et al.  Effects of Small-Group Learning on Undergraduates in Science, Mathematics, Engineering, and Technology: A Meta-Analysis , 1997 .

[12]  Daniel S. Domin,et al.  A Review of Laboratory Instruction Styles , 1999 .

[13]  Dorothy L. Gabel,et al.  Improving Teaching and Learning through Chemistry Education Research: A Look to the Future , 1999 .

[14]  C. W. Bowen,et al.  A Quantitative Literature Review of Cooperative Learning Effects on High School and College Chemistry Achievement. , 2000 .

[15]  Pamela Joy Mulhall,et al.  What is the purpose of this experiment? Or can students learn something from doing experiments? , 2000 .

[16]  Jennifer M. Case,et al.  Students' Metacognitive Development in an Innovative Second Year Chemical Engineering Course , 2001 .

[17]  Eric Malina,et al.  Learning Chemistry in a Laboratory Environment , 2002 .

[18]  M. Cooper.  Cooperative Chemistry Laboratory Manual , 2002 .

[19]  Mary B. Nakhleh,et al.  What Defines Effective Chemistry Laboratory Instruction? Teaching Assistant and Student Perspectives , 2003 .

[20]  Marcia B. Baxter Magolda.  Evolution of a Constructivist Conceptualization of Epistemological Reflection , 2004 .

[21]  Vincent N. Lunetta,et al.  The Laboratory in Science Education: Foundations for the Twenty-First Century , 2004 .

[22]  Jerry P. Suits.  Assessing Investigative Skill Development in Inquiry‐Based and Traditional College Science Laboratory Courses , 2004 .

[23]  Avi Hofstein,et al.  RESEARCH REPORT , 2004 .

[24]  Ronald H. Stevens,et al.  Modeling the Development of Problem Solving Skills in Chemistry with a Web-Based Tutor , 2004, Intelligent Tutoring Systems.

[25]  Melanie M. Cooper,et al.  Chemists' Guide to Effective Teaching , 2005 .

[26]  R. Koeske,et al.  Peer Instruction in the General Chemistry Laboratory: Assessment of Student Learning , 2006 .

[27]  David F. Treagust,et al.  Current Realities and Future Possibilities: Language and science literacy—empowering research and informing instruction , 2006 .

[28]  H. Schweingruber,et al.  America's lab report : investigations in high school science , 2006 .

[29]  S. Larkin.  Collaborative Group Work and Individual Development of Metacognition in the Early Years , 2006 .

[30]  John W. Creswell,et al.  Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research , 2006 .

[31]  David W. Johnson,et al.  Active Learning: Cooperation in the College Classroom , 2006 .

[32]  Kent J. Crippen,et al.  Promoting Self-Regulation in Science Education: Metacognition as Part of a Broader Perspective on Learning , 2006 .

[33]  N. Reid,et al.  The role of laboratory work in university chemistry , 2007 .

[34]  Dawn Rickey,et al.  Effectiveness of a MORE Laboratory Module in Prompting Students To Revise Their Molecular-Level Ideas about Solutions , 2007 .

[35]  M. Jiménez-Aleixandre,et al.  Scaffolded Problem‐solving in the Physics and Chemistry Laboratory: Difficulties hindering students’ assumption of responsibility , 2007 .

[36]  Brian Hand,et al.  Using the science writing heuristic in the general chemistry laboratory to improve students' academic performance , 2007 .

[37]  Rachel Mamlok-Naaman,et al.  The laboratory in science education: the state of the art , 2007 .

[38]  Avi Hofstein,et al.  The Inquiry Laboratory as a Source for Development of Metacognitive Skills , 2008 .

[39]  Ronald H. Stevens,et al.  Reliable multi method assessment of metacognition use in chemistry problem solving , 2008 .

[40]  Ronald H. Stevens,et al.  An Assessment of the Effect of Collaborative Groups on Students' Problem-Solving Strategies and Abilities. , 2008 .

[41]  R. Beghetto.  Correlates of intellectual risk taking in elementary school science , 2009 .

[42]  Robert S. Siegler,et al.  Self-explanations promote children's learning. , 2010 .

[43]  K. Topping,et al.  Cooperative Learning in Science: Follow‐up from primary to high school , 2010 .

[44]  Ning Ding,et al.  Collaboration and Peer Tutoring in Chemistry Laboratory Education , 2011 .

[45]  T. A. Gatlin,et al.  Graduate teaching assistants' epistemological and metacognitive development , 2011 .

[46]  Melanie M. Cooper,et al.  Effect of cooperative problem-based lab instruction on metacognition and problem-solving skills , 2012 .