Improving collisional growth in Lagrangian cloud models: development and verification of a new splitting algorithm

Abstract. Lagrangian cloud models (LCMs) are increasingly used in the cloud physics community. They not only enable a very detailed representation of cloud microphysics but also lack numerical errors typical for most other models. However, insufficient statistics, caused by an inadequate number of Lagrangian particles to represent cloud microphysical processes, can limit the applicability and validity of this approach. This study presents the first use of a splitting and merging algorithm designed to improve the warm cloud precipitation process by deliberately increasing or decreasing the number of Lagrangian particles under appropriate conditions. This new approach and the details of how splitting is executed are evaluated in box and single-cloud simulations, as well as a shallow cumulus test case. The results indicate that splitting is essential for a proper representation of the precipitation process. Moreover, the details of the splitting method (i.e., identifying the appropriate conditions) become insignificant for larger model domains as long as a sufficiently large number of Lagrangian particles is produced by the algorithm. The accompanying merging algorithm is essential to constrict the number of Lagrangian particles in order to maintain the computational performance of the model. Overall, splitting and merging do not affect the life cycle and domain-averaged macroscopic properties of the simulated clouds. This new approach is a useful addition to all LCMs since it is able to significantly increase the number of Lagrangian particles in appropriate regions of the clouds, while maintaining a computationally feasible total number of Lagrangian particles in the entire model domain.

[1]  Siegfried Raasch,et al.  A new method for large-eddy simulations of clouds with Lagrangian droplets including the effects of turbulent collision , 2012 .

[2]  S. Shima,et al.  The super‐droplet method for the numerical simulation of clouds and precipitation: a particle‐based and probabilistic microphysics model coupled with a non‐hydrostatic model , 2007, physics/0701103.

[3]  Hanna Pawlowska,et al.  Stochastic coalescence in Lagrangian cloud microphysics , 2017 .

[4]  Simon Unterstrasser,et al.  Collection/aggregation algorithms in Lagrangian cloud microphysical models: Rigorous evaluation in box model simulations , 2016 .

[5]  Siegfried Raasch,et al.  The Parallelized Large-Eddy Simulation Model (PALM) version 4.0 for atmospheric and oceanic flows: model formulation, recent developments, and future perspectives , 2015 .

[6]  Alan Gadian,et al.  Cloud‐aerosol interactions for boundary layer stratocumulus in the Lagrangian Cloud Model , 2010 .

[7]  Sylwester Arabas,et al.  Large-Eddy Simulations of Trade Wind Cumuli Using Particle-Based Microphysics with Monte Carlo Coalescence , 2012, 1205.3313.

[8]  A. K. Naumann,et al.  Recirculation and growth of raindrops in simulated shallow cumulus , 2016 .

[9]  W. Hall,et al.  A Detailed Microphysical Model Within a Two-Dimensional Dynamic Framework: Model Description and Preliminary Results , 1980 .

[10]  Bernd Kärcher,et al.  A large‐eddy model for cirrus clouds with explicit aerosol and ice microphysics and Lagrangian ice particle tracking , 2010 .

[11]  Axel Seifert,et al.  On the Parameterization of Evaporation of Raindrops as Simulated by a One-Dimensional Rainshaft Model , 2008 .

[12]  Fabian Hoffmann.  On the limits of Köhler activation theory: how do collision and coalescence affect the activation of aerosols? , 2017 .

[13]  C. Ulbrich.  Natural Variations in the Analytical Form of the Raindrop Size Distribution , 1983 .

[14]  Sylwester Arabas,et al.  Large-Eddy Simulations of Trade Wind Cumuli Using Particle-Based Microphysics with Monte Carlo Coalescence , 2013 .

[15]  Lian-Ping Wang,et al.  A bin integral method for solving the kinetic collection equation , 2007, J. Comput. Phys..

[16]  Sylwester Arabas,et al.  libcloudph++ 1.0: a single-moment bulk, double-moment bulk, and particle-based warm-rain microphysics library in C++ , 2013, 1310.1905.

[17]  Siegfried Raasch,et al.  The Route to Raindrop Formation in a Shallow Cumulus Cloud Simulated by a Lagrangian Cloud Model , 2017 .

[18]  Wojciech W. Grabowski,et al.  Lagrangian condensation microphysics with Twomey CCN activation , 2017 .

[19]  Simon Unterstrasser,et al.  Optimisation of the simulation particle number in a Lagrangian ice microphysical model , 2014 .

[20]  L. Collins,et al.  Preferential Concentration of Cloud Droplets by Turbulence: Effects on the Early Evolution of Cumulus Cloud Droplet Spectra , 1998 .

[21]  A. P. Siebesma,et al.  Controls on precipitation and cloudiness in simulations of trade‐wind cumulus as observed during RICO , 2011 .

[22]  R. Caballero,et al.  Broadening of Cloud Droplet Size Spectra by Stochastic Condensation : Effects of Mean Updraft Velocity and CCN Activation , 2017 .

[23]  Siegfried Raasch,et al.  Entrainment of aerosols and their activation in a shallow cumulus cloud studied with a coupled LCM–LES approach , 2014 .

[24]  A. K. Naumann,et al.  A Lagrangian drop model to study warm rain microphysical processes in shallow cumulus , 2015 .