Exploring technology opportunities by visualizing patent information based on generative topographic mapping and link prediction

Abstract The shortening lifetime of technology requires companies to make intensive efforts to continuously explore new technology. Although many researchers have proposed visualization methods to find technology opportunities, little attention has been paid to present detailed directions of technology development with specified characteristics of technology. Thus, this research aims to suggest a systematic approach to conducting technology opportunity analysis by visualizing patent information, such as patent documents and citation relationships. First, keywords that explain core concepts, functions, and so on are extracted from collected patent documents by text mining. Second, patents are visualized in a two-dimensional space, and vacant cells are identified with their estimated keyword vectors by generative topographic mapping (GTM). Third, since many vacant cells will be potential candidates for developing new technologies, link prediction tools can choose promising vacant cells to connect existing cells with potential, but not yet existent, cells. Finally, the results of prediction are tested by comparing the predicted cells with the actual developed cells. The research reported in this paper is based in three technologies that have emerging, stable, and declining patterns, in order to illustrate the proposed approach, and investigate in which types it is relevant. It is found that the proposed approach provided a good prediction performance in the case of a technology that has a stable pattern. In addition, among link prediction methods, a semantic similarity-based approach showed better prediction results than a machine learning technique due to modest data availability for training. Thus, the results of this research can help R&D managers plan and evaluate R&D projects for technology development.

[1]  So Young Sohn,et al.  Predicting the pattern of technology convergence using big-data technology on large-scale triadic patents , 2015 .

[2]  Sungjoo Lee,et al.  An approach to discovering new technology opportunities: Keyword-based patent map approach , 2009 .

[3]  V. Latora,et al.  Complex networks: Structure and dynamics , 2006 .

[4]  Michael I. Jordan,et al.  Latent Dirichlet Allocation , 2001, J. Mach. Learn. Res..

[5]  Paola Criscuolo,et al.  The 'home advantage' effect and patent families. A comparison of OECD triadic patents, the USPTO and the EPO , 2006, Scientometrics.

[6]  Christopher L. Magee,et al.  A hybrid keyword and patent class methodology for selecting relevant sets of patents for a technological field , 2013, Scientometrics.

[7]  Alan L. Porter,et al.  On the Future of Technological Forecasting , 2001 .

[8]  Kuei-Kuei Lai,et al.  Exploring technology diffusion and classification of business methods: Using the patent citation network , 2009 .

[9]  Ola Olsson,et al.  Technological Opportunity and Growth , 2005 .

[10]  Mark E. J. Newman,et al.  The Structure and Function of Complex Networks , 2003, SIAM Rev..

[11]  J. Schumpeter,et al.  Business Cycles: A Theoretical, Historical, and Statistical Analysis of the Capitalist Process , 1940 .

[12]  Albert-László Barabási,et al.  Statistical mechanics of complex networks , 2001, ArXiv.

[13]  Dongwoo Kang,et al.  An SAO-based text mining approach to building a technology tree for technology planning , 2012, Expert Syst. Appl..

[14]  Jure Leskovec,et al.  Predicting positive and negative links in online social networks , 2010, WWW '10.

[15]  Alan L. Porter,et al.  Mining External R&D , 2011 .

[16]  Fernando Enríquez,et al.  An approach to the use of word embeddings in an opinion classification task , 2016, Expert Syst. Appl..

[17]  Oh-Jin Kwon,et al.  Concentric diversification based on technological capabilities: Link analysis of products and technologies , 2017 .

[18]  Kwangsoo Kim,et al.  Identifying technological competition trends for R&D planning using dynamic patent maps: SAO-based content analysis , 2012, Scientometrics.

[19]  L. da F. Costa,et al.  Characterization of complex networks: A survey of measurements , 2005, cond-mat/0505185.

[20]  P. Savioz,et al.  Strategic forecast tool for SMEs: how the opportunity landscape interacts with business strategy to anticipate technological trends , 2002 .

[21]  Jon Kleinberg,et al.  The link prediction problem for social networks , 2003, CIKM '03.

[22]  John P. Dismukes,et al.  "Technologies of Thinking" Seen Key to Accelerated Radical Innovation , 2005 .

[23]  Jeongjin Lee,et al.  Technology opportunity discovery to R&D planning: Key technological performance analysis☆ , 2017 .

[24]  Shih-Chieh Fang,et al.  Exploring technological opportunities by mining the gaps between science and technology: Microalgal biofuels , 2015 .

[25]  Sungjoon Lee,et al.  Patent databases for innovation studies: A comparative analysis of USPTO, EPO, JPO and KIPO , 2015 .

[26]  Rain Chen,et al.  Design patent map visualization display , 2009, Expert Syst. Appl..

[27]  Stephen Carley,et al.  Visualizing geo-spatial data in science, technology and innovation , 2014 .

[28]  M. Newman Clustering and preferential attachment in growing networks. , 2001, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[29]  Christopher L. Magee,et al.  Quantitative Determination of Technological Improvement from Patent Data , 2015, PloS one.

[30]  Ronnie Ramlogan,et al.  Forecasting of potential impacts of disruptive technology in promising technological areas: Elaborating the SIRS epidemic model in RFID technology , 2017 .

[31]  Ming-Yeu Wang,et al.  Identifying Technology Trends for R&D Planning Using TRIZ and Text Mining , 2010 .

[32]  Bokyoung Kang,et al.  Novelty-focused patent mapping for technology opportunity analysis , 2015 .

[33]  Ichiro Sakata,et al.  Extracting the commercialization gap between science and technology — Case study of a solar cell , 2010 .

[34]  Bo Gao,et al.  PatentMiner: topic-driven patent analysis and mining , 2012, KDD.

[35]  Christopher M. Bishop,et al.  GTM: The Generative Topographic Mapping , 1998, Neural Computation.

[36]  Alan L. Porter,et al.  Emerging technologies: quantitative identification and measurement , 2010, Technol. Anal. Strateg. Manag..

[37]  Yongtae Park,et al.  Monitoring trends of technological changes based on the dynamic patent lattice: A modified formal concept analysis approach , 2011 .

[38]  Wolfgang Glänzel,et al.  Patents cited in the scientific literature: An exploratory study of 'reverse' citation relations , 2004, Scientometrics.

[39]  Robert Phaal,et al.  A conceptual model for technology intelligence , 2006 .

[40]  Joshua S. Gans,et al.  The Disruption Dilemma , 2016 .