Phylogenetic Overdispersion in Floridian Oak Communities

Closely related species that occur together in communities and experience similar environmental conditions are likely to share phenotypic traits because of the process of environmental filtering. At the same time, species that are too similar are unlikely to co‐occur because of competitive exclusion. In an effort to explain the coexistence of 17 oak species within forest communities in North Central Florida, we examined correlations between the phylogenetic relatedness of oak species, their degree of co‐occurrence within communities and niche overlap across environmental gradients, and their similarity in ecophysiological and life‐history traits. We show that the oaks are phylogenetically overdispersed because co‐occurring species are more distantly related than expected by chance, and oaks within the same clade show less niche overlap than expected. Hence, communities are more likely to include members of both the red oak and the \documentclass{aastex} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{bm} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{pifont} \usepackage{stmaryrd} \usepackage{textcomp} \usepackage{portland,xspace} \usepackage{amsmath,amsxtra} \usepackage[OT2,OT1]{fontenc} \newcommand\cyr{ \renewcommand\rmdefault{wncyr} \renewcommand\sfdefault{wncyss} \renewcommand\encodingdefault{OT2} \normalfont \selectfont} \DeclareTextFontCommand{\textcyr}{\cyr} \pagestyle{empty} \DeclareMathSizes{10}{9}{7}{6} \begin{document} \landscape $$\mathrm{white}\,+\mathrm{live}\,$$ \end{document} oak clades than only members of one clade. This pattern of phylogenetic overdispersion arises because traits important for habitat specialization show evolutionary convergence. We hypothesize further that certain conserved traits permit coexistence of distantly related congeners. These results provide an explanation for how oak diversity is maintained at the community level in North Central Florida.

[1]  A. Rossman,et al.  Fungi on Plants and Plant Products in the United States , 1989 .

[2]  E. Pianka The structure of lizard communities , 1973 .

[3]  H. Kurz,et al.  The Trees of Northern Florida. , 1963 .

[4]  N. Gotelli,et al.  NULL MODELS IN ECOLOGY , 1996 .

[5]  J. Silvertown,et al.  A phylogenetic approach to community assembly from a local species pool , 2000, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[6]  K. Böhning‐Gaese,et al.  Phylogenetic effects on morphological, life-history, behavioural and ecological traits of birds , 1999 .

[7]  C. L. Mohler Co-occurrence of oak subgenera : implications for niche differentiation , 1990 .

[8]  B. Rannala,et al.  Phylogenetic methods come of age: testing hypotheses in an evolutionary context. , 1997, Science.

[9]  H. Fowells Silvics of forest trees of the United States. , 1965 .

[10]  D. B. Burt Evolutionary stasis, constraint and other terminology describing evolutionary patterns☆ , 2001 .

[11]  I. Lovette,et al.  The Imprint of History on Communities of North American and Asian Warblers , 2000, The American Naturalist.

[12]  P. J. Hughesdon,et al.  The Struggle for Existence , 1927, Nature.

[13]  B. Shorrocks,et al.  A need for niches? , 1991, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[14]  James F. Jackson,et al.  Allometry of Constitutive Defense: A Model and a Comparative Test with Tree Bark and Fire Regime , 1999, The American Naturalist.

[15]  Campbell O. Webb,et al.  Phylogenies and Community Ecology , 2002 .

[16]  F. Bazzaz,et al.  ASYMPTOTIC HEIGHT AS A PREDICTOR OF PHOTOSYNTHETIC CHARACTERISTICS IN MALAYSIAN RAIN FOREST TREES , 1999 .

[17]  P. Manos,et al.  The Historical Biogeography of Fagaceae: Tracking the Tertiary History of Temperate and Subtropical Forests of the Northern Hemisphere , 2001, International Journal of Plant Sciences.

[18]  H. L. Short,et al.  NUTRIENT QUALITY AND DIGESTIBILITY OF SEEDS AND FRUITS FROM SOUTHERN FORESTS , 1976 .

[19]  Jeannine M Cavender-Bares,et al.  Hydraulic properties and freezing‐induced cavitation in sympatric evergreen and deciduous oaks with contrasting habitats , 2001 .

[20]  R. Hunt Plant Growth Curves: The Functional Approach to Plant Growth Analysis , 1983 .

[21]  D. Ord,et al.  PAUP:Phylogenetic analysis using parsi-mony , 1993 .

[22]  K. Nixon,et al.  TRIGONOBALANUS (FAGACEAE): TAXONOMIC STATUS AND PHYLOGENETIC RELATIONSHIPS , 1989 .

[23]  James F. Jackson,et al.  Estimating the Allometry of Tree Bark , 1995 .

[24]  T. Case,et al.  Character displacement in some Cnemidophorus lizards revisited: a phylogenetic analysis. , 1997, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[25]  J. Felsenstein Phylogenies and the Comparative Method , 1985, The American Naturalist.

[26]  Peter C. Hoch,et al.  A Phylogenetic Analysis of Epilobium (Onagraceae) Based on Nuclear Ribosomal DNA Sequences , 1994 .

[27]  K. Nixon,et al.  Phylogeny, biogeography, and processes of molecular differentiation in Quercus subgenus Quercus (Fagaceae). , 1999, Molecular phylogenetics and evolution.

[28]  R H Whittaker,et al.  Evolution of diversity in plant communities. , 1969, Brookhaven symposia in biology.

[29]  P. Legendre,et al.  MODELING BRAIN EVOLUTION FROM BEHAVIOR: A PERMUTATIONAL REGRESSION APPROACH , 1994, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[30]  T. Garland,et al.  Procedures for the Analysis of Comparative Data Using Phylogenetically Independent Contrasts , 1992 .

[31]  E. Buckler,et al.  The evolution of ribosomal DNA: divergent paralogues and phylogenetic implications. , 1997, Genetics.

[32]  C. Monk Successional and Environmental Relationships of the Forest Vegetation of North Central Florida , 1968 .

[33]  P. Chesson,et al.  Environmental Variability Promotes Coexistence in Lottery Competitive Systems , 1981, The American Naturalist.

[34]  K. Nixon,et al.  The genus Quercus in Mexico. , 1993 .

[35]  E. E. Burns,et al.  CHEMICAL AND PHYSICAL PROPERTIES OF SELECTED ACORNS , 1971 .

[36]  P. D. Smallwood,et al.  The Ultimate Basis of the Caching Preferences of Rodents, and the Oak-Dispersal Syndrome: Tannins, Insects, and Seed Germination1 , 2001 .

[37]  A. Coleman,et al.  Ribosomal DNA ITS-1 and ITS-2 sequence comparisons as a tool for predicting genetic relatedness. , 1997, Journal of molecular evolution.

[38]  W. Crepet,et al.  OAK CATKINS, LEAVES AND FRUITS FROM THE OLIGOCENE CATAHOULA FORMATION AND THEIR EVOLUTIONARY SIGNIFICANCE' , 1983 .

[39]  Paul A. Keddy,et al.  Community Assembly Rules, Morphological Dispersion, and the Coexistence of Plant Species , 1998 .

[40]  J. Silvertown,et al.  Phylogeny and the niche structure of meadow plant communities , 2001 .

[41]  David D. Ackerly,et al.  Flammability and serotiny as strategies: correlated evolution in pines , 2001 .

[42]  J. Pickens,et al.  Probit Analysis of Oak Wilt Transmission Through Root Grafts in Red Oak Stands , 1991 .

[43]  F. Rohlf,et al.  Ecological character displacement in Plethodon: biomechanical differences found from a geometric morphometric study. , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[44]  B. Schaal,et al.  Interspecific gene flow in sympatric oaks. , 1991, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[45]  Charles H. Cannon,et al.  Systematics of Fagaceae: Phylogenetic Tests of Reproductive Trait Evolution , 2001, International Journal of Plant Sciences.

[46]  R. Macarthur,et al.  The Limiting Similarity, Convergence, and Divergence of Coexisting Species , 1967, The American Naturalist.

[47]  D. Ackerly Community Assembly, Niche Conservatism, and Adaptive Evolution in Changing Environments , 2003, International Journal of Plant Sciences.

[48]  D. I. Axelrod Biogeography of oaks in the Arcto-Tertiary Province , 1983 .

[49]  K. Kikuzawa A Cost-Benefit Analysis of Leaf Habit and Leaf Longevity of Trees and Their Geographical Pattern , 1991, The American Naturalist.

[50]  P. Reich,et al.  Leaf Life‐Span in Relation to Leaf, Plant, and Stand Characteristics among Diverse Ecosystems , 1992 .

[51]  Richard E. Glor,et al.  Niche lability in the evolution of a Caribbean lizard community , 2003, Nature.

[52]  M. Leibold Similarity and local co-existence of species in regional biotas , 2004, Evolutionary Ecology.

[53]  C. Elton Competition and the Structure of Ecological Communities , 1946 .

[54]  D. Guerin Oak dome clonal structure and fire ecology in a Florida longleaf pine dominated community , 1993 .

[55]  Campbell O. Webb,et al.  Exploring the Phylogenetic Structure of Ecological Communities: An Example for Rain Forest Trees , 2000, The American Naturalist.

[56]  T. Givnish,et al.  PHYLOGENY, CONCERTED CONVERGENCE, AND PHYLOGENETIC NICHE CONSERVATISM IN THE CORE LILIALES: INSIGHTS FROM rbcL AND ndhF SEQUENCE DATA , 2002, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[57]  C. H. Muller The Central American species of Quercus , 1942 .

[58]  A. Kremer,et al.  ARE CHLOROPLAST AND MITOCHONDRIAL DNA VARIATION SPECIES INDEPENDENT IN OAKS? , 1999, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[59]  S. Sakai Asynchronous leaf expansion and shedding in a seasonal environment: Result of a competitive game , 1992 .

[60]  John S. Sperry,et al.  Xylem Embolism in Ring‐Porous, Diffuse‐Porous, and Coniferous Trees of Northern Utah and Interior Alaska , 1994 .

[61]  T. Hinckley,et al.  CHAPTER 3 – TEMPERATE HARDWOOD FORESTS , 1981 .

[62]  J. Cavender-Bares,et al.  Integrating micro- and macroevolutionary processes in community ecology , 2003 .

[63]  H. Mooney,et al.  Convergence Versus Nonconvergence in Mediterranean-Climate Ecosystems , 1978 .

[64]  R. L. Myers,et al.  Ecosystems of Florida. , 1991 .

[65]  E. Menges,et al.  Life History Strategies of Florida Scrub Plants in Relation to Fire , 1995 .

[66]  S. Manchester,et al.  The Use of Geological and Paleontological Evidence in Evaluating Plant Phylogeographic Hypotheses in the Northern Hemisphere Tertiary , 2001, International Journal of Plant Sciences.

[67]  Peter Chesson,et al.  Coexistence of Competitors in Spatially and Temporally Varying Environments: A Look at the Combined Effects of Different Sorts of Variability , 1985 .

[68]  R. Simons,et al.  Age, composition, and stand structure of old-growth oak sites in the Florida high pine landscape: implications for ecosystem management and restoration , 1999 .

[69]  R. Olmstead,et al.  Phylogeny of Poaceae subfamily Pooideae based on chloroplast ndhF gene sequences. , 1997, Molecular phylogenetics and evolution.

[70]  H. Webber THE FLORIDA SCRUB, A FIRE‐FIGHTING ASSOCIATION , 1935 .

[71]  Thomas W. Schoener,et al.  Nonsynchronous Spatial Overlap of Lizards in Patchy Habitats , 1970 .

[72]  T. Garland,et al.  Tempo and mode in evolution: phylogenetic inertia, adaptation and comparative methods , 2002 .

[73]  W. Armbruster PATTERNS OF CHARACTER DIVERGENCE AND THE EVOLUTION OF REPRODUCTIVE ECOTYPES OF DALECHAMPIA SCANDENS (EUPHORBIACEAE) , 1985, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[74]  M. Donoghue,et al.  Leaf Size, Sapling Allometry, and Corner's Rules: Phylogeny and Correlated Evolution in Maples (Acer) , 1998, The American Naturalist.

[75]  P. Keddy,et al.  The assembly of experimental wetland plant communities , 1995 .

[76]  M. Hill,et al.  Data analysis in community and landscape ecology , 1987 .

[77]  D. Schluter Ecological Causes of Adaptive Radiation , 1996, The American Naturalist.

[78]  Jeannine Cavender-Bares,et al.  MULTIPLE TRAIT ASSOCIATIONS IN RELATION TO HABITAT DIFFERENTIATION AMONG 17 FLORIDIAN OAK SPECIES , 2004 .

[79]  D. Schluter,et al.  Ecological Character Displacement and Speciation in Sticklebacks , 1992, The American Naturalist.