Characteristics of Trailer Thermal Environment during Commercial Swine Transport Managed under U.S. Industry Guidelines

Simple Summary Temperature and thermal conditions of the interior of a swine trailer during transport were monitored over a broad range of outdoor conditions (34 trips total) managed according to industry best practice (Transport Quality Assurance (TQA) guidelines (NPB, 2008)). For the outdoor temperature range of 5 °C (40 °F) to 27 °C (80 °F), generally acceptable trailer thermal conditions were observed according to the TQA. Beyond this outdoor temperature range, undesirable conditions within the trailer were prevalent. Areas for potential improvement in transport management were identified. Stops resulted in rapid increases in temperature, which could be beneficial during cooler outdoor temperatures, but detrimental for warmer outdoor temperatures. Abstract Transport is a critical factor in modern pork production and can seriously affect swine welfare. While previous research has explored thermal conditions during transport, the impact of extreme weather conditions on the trailer thermal environment under industry practices has not been well documented; and the critical factors impacting microclimate are not well understood. To assess the trailer microclimate during transport events, an instrumentation system was designed and installed at the central ceiling level, pig level and floor-level in each of six zones inside a commercial swine trailer. Transport environmental data from 34 monitoring trips (approximately 1–4 h in duration each) were collected from May, 2012, to February, 2013, with trailer management corresponding to the National Pork Board Transport Quality Assurance (TQA) guidelines in 31 of these trips. According to the TQA guidelines, for outdoor temperature ranging from 5 °C (40 °F) to 27 °C (80 °F), acceptable thermal conditions were observed based on the criteria that no more than 10% of the trip duration was above 35 °C (95 °F) or below 0 °C (32 °F). Recommended bedding, boarding and water application were sufficient in this range. Measurements support relaxing boarding guidelines for moderate outdoor conditions, as this did not result in less desirable conditions. Pigs experienced extended undesirable thermal conditions for outdoor temperatures above 27 °C (80 °F) or below 5 °C (40 °F), meriting a recommendation for further assessment of bedding, boarding and water application guidelines for extreme outdoor temperatures. An Emergency Livestock Weather Safety Index (LWSI) condition was observed inside the trailer when outdoor temperature exceeded 10 °C (50 °F); although the validity of LWSI to indicate heat stress for pigs during transport is not well established. Extreme pig surface temperatures in the rear and middle zones of the trailer were more frequently experienced than in the front zones, and the few observations of pigs dead or down upon arrival were noted in these zones. Observations indicate that arranging boarding placement may alter the ventilation patterns inside the trailer.

[1]  Yijie Xiong Evaluation of trailer thermal environment during commercial swine transport , 2014 .

[2]  M. J. Ritter,et al.  Effects of floor space during transport and journey time on indicators of stress and transport losses of market-weight pigs. , 2011, Journal of animal science.

[3]  Anna K. Johnson,et al.  Establishing Bedding Requirements during Transport and Monitoring Skin Temperature during Cold and Mild Seasons after Transport for Finishing Pigs , 2014, Animals : an open access journal from MDPI.

[4]  H. Xin,et al.  Chapter 1: Basic Principles of the Thermal Environment and Livestock Energetics , 2009 .

[5]  Anna K. Johnson,et al.  Review:Transport Losses in Market Weight Pigs: I. A Review of Definitions, Incidence, and Economic Impact , 2009 .

[6]  Roger A. Eigenberg,et al.  Thermal indices and their applications for livestock environments , 2009 .

[7]  K. Stalder,et al.  Factors associated with fatigued, injured, and dead pig frequency during transport and lairage at a commercial abattoir. , 2009, Journal of animal science.

[8]  Timothy S. Stombaugh,et al.  AIR EXCHANGE RATE IN A HORSE TRAILER DURING ROAD TRANSPORT , 2006 .

[9]  Jennifer Brown,et al.  Temperature and Humidity Conditions in Trucks Transporting Pigs in Two Seasons in Eastern and Western Canada , 2011 .

[10]  C. Dewey,et al.  Relationship between estimated finishing-pig space allowance and in-transit loss in a retrospective survey of 3 packing plants in Ontario in 2003. , 2010, Canadian journal of veterinary research = Revue canadienne de recherche veterinaire.

[11]  Roger A. Eigenberg,et al.  Chapter 6: Instrumentation for Research and Management in Animal Agriculture , 2009 .

[12]  M. J. Ritter,et al.  Effects of season and distance moved during loading on transport losses of market-weight pigs in two commercially available types of trailer. , 2008, Journal of animal science.

[13]  M. J. Ritter,et al.  Effects of distance moved during loading and floor space on the trailer during transport on losses of market weight pigs on arrival at the packing plant. , 2007, Journal of animal science.

[14]  John J. McGlone,et al.  The effect of three space allowances on the physiology and behavior of weaned pigs during transportation , 2009 .

[15]  H. Kattesh,et al.  Physiological and immunological responses to weaning and transport in the young pig: modulation by administration of porcine somatotropin. , 2008, Journal of animal science.

[16]  D. Fielding Environmental management in animal agriculture , 1985, Tropical Animal Health and Production.

[17]  Animals , 1981, Restoration & Management Notes.

[18]  D. Anderson,et al.  Moving Devices for Finishing Pigs: Efficacy of Electric Prod, Board, Paddle, or Flag , 2004 .

[19]  Yigang Sun,et al.  Impact of trailer design factors on conditions during transport , 2010 .

[20]  R. P. Hoxey,et al.  AP—Animal Production Technology: Design and Operation of a Prototype Mechanical Ventilation System for Livestock Transport Vehicles , 2001 .

[21]  M. Sutherland,et al.  Effects of variations in the environment, length of journey and type of trailer on the mortality and morbidity of pigs being transported to slaughter , 2009, Veterinary Record.

[22]  M. Sutherland,et al.  The effect transport and space allowance on the physiology of breeding age gilts , 2011 .