Applying and extending ISO/TC42 digital camera resolution standards to mobile imaging products

There are no fundamental differences between today's mobile telephone cameras and consumer digital still cameras that suggest many existing ISO imaging performance standards do not apply. To the extent that they have lenses, color filter arrays, detectors, apertures, image processing, and are hand held, there really are no operational or architectural differences. Despite this, there are currently differences in the levels of imaging performance. These are driven by physical and economic constraints, and image-capture conditions. Several ISO standards for resolution, well established for digital consumer digital cameras, require care when applied to the current generation of cell phone cameras. In particular, accommodation of optical flare, shading non-uniformity and distortion are recommended. We offer proposals for the application of existing ISO imaging resolution performance standards to mobile imaging products, and suggestions for extending performance standards to the characteristic behavior of camera phones.

[1]  Peter D. Burns,et al.  Low-frequency MTF estimation for digital imaging devices using slanted-edge analysis , 2003, IS&T/SPIE Electronic Imaging.

[2]  Richard L. Baer,et al.  Circular-edge spatial frequency response test , 2003, IS&T/SPIE Electronic Imaging.

[3]  Peter D. Burns,et al.  Refined Slanted-Edge Measurement from Practical Camera and Scanner Testing , 2002, PICS.

[4]  M. Bernas,et al.  Image quality evaluation , 2002, International Symposium on VIPromCom Video/Image Processing and Multimedia Communications.

[5]  Don R. Williams,et al.  Debunking of Specsmanship: Progress on ISO/TC42 Standards for Digital Capture Imaging Performance , 2003, PICS.

[6]  Dietmar Wüller.  Proposal for a standard procedure to test mobile phone cameras , 2006, Electronic Imaging.

[7]  K. Biedermann,et al.  Lens Performance Assessment By Image Quality Criteria , 1985, Other Conferences.

[8]  Peter D. Burns.  Tone-transfer (OECF) characteristics and spatial frequency response measurements for digital cameras and scanners , 2005, IS&T/SPIE Electronic Imaging.

[9]  Larry A. Scarff.  Quantification of the unsharp masking technique of image enhancement , 1981 .

[10]  David L. Lee,et al.  Performance of three image-quality metrics in ink-jet printing of plain papers , 1993, J. Electronic Imaging.

[11]  Peter D. Burns.  Variation and Calibration Error in Electronic Imaging , 2002, PICS.

[12]  Peter D. Burns,et al.  Using Slanted Edge Analysis for Color Registration Measurement , 1999, PICS.