Peer Effects in European Primary Schools: Evidence from Pirls

We estimate peer effects for fourth graders in six European countries. The identification relies on variation across classes within schools. We argue that classes within primary schools are formed roughly randomly with respect to family background. Similar to previous studies, we find sizeable estimates of peer effects in standard OLS specifications. The size of the estimate is much reduced within schools. This could be explained either by selection into schools or by measurement error in the peer background variable. When we correct for measurement error we find within school estimates close to the original OLS estimates. Our results suggest that the peer effect is modestly large, measurement error is important in our survey data, and selection plays little role in biasing peer effects estimates. We find no significant evidence of non-linear peer effects.

[1]  Bryan S. Graham,et al.  Identifying Social Interactions Through Conditional Variance Restrictions , 2008 .

[2]  R. Winter‐Ebmer,et al.  Peer effects in Austrian schools , 2005 .

[3]  Ludger Woessmann.  How Equal are Educational Opportunities? Family Background and Student Achievement in Europe and the United States , 2004, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[4]  Orley Ashenfelter,et al.  Estimates of the Economic Return to Schooling from a New Sample of Twins , 1992 .

[5]  Steven D. Levitt,et al.  The Effect of School Choice on Participants: Evidence from Randomized Lotteries , 2006 .

[6]  Kevin Lang,et al.  Does School Integration Generate Peer Effects? Evidence from Boston's Metco Program , 2004, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[7]  A. Krueger,et al.  Experimental Estimates of Education Production Functions , 1997 .

[8]  Helen F. Ladd,et al.  Teacher-Student Matching and the Assessment of Teacher Effectiveness , 2006, The Journal of Human Resources.

[9]  Thomas J. Kane,et al.  Estimating Returns to Schooling When Schooling is Misreported , 1999 .

[10]  Walter L. Smith.  Probability and Statistics , 1959, Nature.

[11]  Andreas Ammermüller.  Educational Opportunities and the Role of Institutions , 2005 .

[12]  C. Manski.  Identification of Endogenous Social Effects: The Reflection Problem , 1993 .

[13]  Paul Glewwe.  Estimating the impact of peer group effects on socioeconomic outcomes: Does the distribution of peer group characteristics matter? , 1997 .

[14]  C. Hoxby,et al.  Peer Effects in the Classroom: Learning from Gender and Race Variation , 2000 .

[15]  Participating states,et al.  Progress in International Reading Literacy Study (PIRLS) , 2006 .

[16]  Thomas J. Nechyba,et al.  Peer Effects in North Carolina Public Schools , 2004 .

[17]  Bryan S. Graham,et al.  Identifying Social Interactions through Excess Variance Contrasts , 2005 .

[18]  Shqiponja Telhaj,et al.  Peer Effects and Pupil Attainment: Evidence from Secondary School Transition. CEE DP 63. , 2006 .

[19]  Michael A. Boozer,et al.  Inside the 'Black Box' of Project Star: Estimation of Peer Effects Using Experimental Data , 2001 .

[20]  Robert J. Mislevy,et al.  Randomization-based inference about latent variables from complex samples , 1991 .

[21]  Steven D. Levitt,et al.  The Effect of School Choice on Student Outcomes: Evidence from Randomized Lotteries , 2003 .

[22]  P. McEwan.  Peer effects on student achievement: evidence from Chile , 2003 .

[23]  C. Hoxby.  The Effects of Class Size on Student Achievement: New Evidence from Population Variation , 2000 .