Skin tumorigenesis by initiators and promoters of different chemical structures in lines of mice selectively bred for resistance (car‐r) or susceptibility (car‐s) to two‐stage skin carcinogenesis

Carcinogenesis‐resistant (Car‐R) and carcinogenesis‐susceptible (Car‐S) mice were obtained applying a bi‐directional selective breeding approach to a two‐stage skin carcinogenesis protocol, using 9,10‐dimethyl‐1,2‐benzanthracene (DMBA) as initiator and 12‐O‐tetradecanoylphorbol‐13‐acetate (TPA) as promoter. Sixteen generations of selection produced a remarkable interline difference in responsiveness to two‐stage skin carcinogenesis between Car‐R and Car‐S: identical DMBA (25 μg) and TPA (5 μg) doses induced papillomas in 100% of Car‐S compared with 3.3% of Car‐R mice and maximal responses of 14.3 or 0.03 papillomas/mouse, respectively, despite the shorter promotion applied to Car‐S (49 vs. 208 days). To define the factors determining this great difference, Car‐R and Car‐S mice were challenged by initiators/promoters chemically unrelated to those used for selection. Both lines were subjected to either initiation by N‐methyl‐N‐nitrosourea (MNU) followed by TPA promotion, or promotion by benzoyl peroxide, or 1,8‐dihydroxy‐3‐methyl‐9‐anthrone (chrysarobin) following DMBA initiation. Initiation with MNU induced a 10‐fold tumour incidence in Car‐S compared with Car‐R mice, and a 32‐fold difference in tumour induction rate. The 2 lines also differed markedly in susceptibility to benzoyl peroxide promotion: Car‐S mice initiated with 25 μg DMBA and promoted with 7.5 mg benzoyl peroxide showed a 12‐fold tumour incidence and a 103‐fold tumour induction rate compared with the corresponding Car‐R group. Both lines, however, were refractory to chrysarobin promotion. The progression of papillomas to carcinomas was examined in all Car‐S groups. The incidence of mice that developed carcinomas was 57% in MNU‐initiated mice. Benzoyl peroxide was also able to promote carcinoma development in Car‐S mice, though with a lower incidence (30.4%) than TPA. Int. J. Cancer 83:335–340, 1999. © 1999 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.

[1]  V. Covelli,et al.  Inversion of genetic predisposition to carcinogenesis in liver of two lines of mice selected for resistance (Car-R) or susceptibility (Car-S) to skin carcinogenesis. , 1998, Cancer letters.

[2]  H. Majima,et al.  Evidence for mRNA expression of vascular endothelial growth factor by X-ray irradiation in a lung squamous carcinoma cell line. , 1998, Cancer letters.

[3]  S. Yuspa,et al.  Multigenic control of skin tumor susceptibility in SENCARA/Pt mice. , 1998, Carcinogenesis.

[4]  A. Saran,et al.  Effect of genetic modification of acute inflammatory responsiveness on tumorigenesis in the mouse. , 1998, Carcinogenesis.

[5]  K. Minda,et al.  Association of a murine chromosome 9 locus (Psl1) with susceptibility to mouse skin tumor promotion by 12‐O‐tetradecanoylphorbol‐13‐acetate , 1997, Molecular carcinogenesis.

[6]  G. Doria,et al.  Genetics of chemical carcinogenesis--III. Tissue-specificity of the genes controlling susceptibility and resistance to skin carcinogenesis in the mouse. , 1996, Carcinogenesis.

[7]  B. Kaina,et al.  Targeted expression of human O(6)-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) in transgenic mice protects against tumor initiation in two-stage skin carcinogenesis. , 1996, Cancer research.

[8]  A. Balmain,et al.  Distinct genetic loci control development of benign and malignant skin tumours in mice , 1995, Nature Genetics.

[9]  G. Doria,et al.  Genetics of chemical carcinogenesis--II. Papilloma induction and malignant conversion in susceptible (Car-s) and resistant (Car-R) lines of mice produced by bidirectional selective breeding and in their (Car-S X Car-R) F1 hybrids. , 1994, Carcinogenesis.

[10]  M. Gariboldi,et al.  Multiple loci affect genetic predisposition to hepatocarcinogenesis in mice. , 1994, Genomics.

[11]  A. Saran,et al.  Comparison of 7,12-dimethylbenz(a)anthracene-DNA adduction in the epidermis of two lines of mice selected for resistance (CAR-R) or susceptibility (CAR-S) to skin carcinogenesis. , 1994, Cancer research.

[12]  T. Slaga,et al.  Dissociation of sensitivities to tumor promotion and progression in outbred and inbred SENCAR mice. , 1992, Cancer research.

[13]  P. Demant Genetic resolution of susceptibility to cancer--new perspectives. , 1992, Seminars in cancer biology.

[14]  J. DiGiovanni,et al.  Evidence for a common genetic pathway controlling susceptibility to mouse skin tumor promotion by diverse classes of promoting agents. , 1991, Cancer research.

[15]  G. Doria,et al.  Genetics of chemical carcinogenesis. 1. Bidirectional selective breeding of susceptible and resistant lines of mice to two-stage skin carcinogenesis. , 1990, Carcinogenesis.

[16]  T. Slaga Cellular and molecular mechanisms involved in multistage skin carcinogenesis. , 1989, Carcinogenesis; a comprehensive survey.

[17]  J. DiGiovanni,et al.  Susceptibility to phorbol ester skin tumor promotion in (C57BL/6 x DBA/2) F1 mice is inherited as an incomplete dominant trait: evidence for multi-locus involvement. , 1988, Carcinogenesis.

[18]  J. Barrett,et al.  Tumor promoters : biological approaches for mechanistic studies and assay systems , 1988 .

[19]  D. Johnston,et al.  Tumorigenic and molecular characterization of novel phorbol ester‐resistant and ‐sensitive lines of mice , 1988, Molecular carcinogenesis.

[20]  C. Conti,et al.  Characterization of skin tumor promotion and progression by chrysarobin in SENCAR mice. , 1987, Cancer research.

[21]  T. Slaga,et al.  Characterization of an inbred strain of the SENCAR mouse that is highly sensitive to phorbol esters. , 1987, Carcinogenesis.

[22]  A. Malkinson,et al.  Susceptibility to urethan-induced pulmonary adenomas between A/J and C57BL/6J mice: use of AXB and BXA recombinant inbred lines indicating a three-locus genetic model. , 1985, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[23]  S. Nesnow,et al.  Murine susceptibility to two-stage skin carcinogenesis is influenced by the agent used for promotion. , 1984, Carcinogenesis.