The image-to-physical liver registration sparse data challenge

Over the last 25 years, the number of papers written that involve image guidance, liver, and registration has, on average, doubled every 6-8 years. While image guidance has a long history within the neurosurgical theatre, it’s translation to other soft-tissue organs such as the liver has been slower given the inherent difficulty in image-to-physical registration. More specifically, deformations have been recognized to compromise image guidance fidelity in virtually all soft-tissue image guidance applications. As a result, an active area of investigation is the development of sparse-data-driven nonrigid image-to-physical liver registration techniques to compensate for deformation and provide accurate localization for image guided liver surgery. In this work we have leveraged our extensive human-to-phantom registration testing framework based on the work in [1] and Amazon Web Services to create a sparse data challenge for the image guided liver surgery community (https://sparsedatachallenge.org/). Our sparse data challenge will allow research groups from across the world to extensively test their approaches on common data and have quantitative accuracy measurements provided for assessment of fidelity. Welcome to the Sparse Data Challenge for image-to-physical liver registration assessment.

[1]  Benoit M. Dawant,et al.  Organ Surface Deformation Measurement and Analysis in Open Hepatic Surgery: Method and Preliminary Results From 12 Clinical Cases , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[2]  Michael I. Miga,et al.  Deformation correction for image guided liver surgery: An intraoperative fidelity assessment , 2017, Surgery.

[3]  E. Benedetti,et al.  Financial Impact of the Robotic Approach in Liver Surgery: A Comparative Study of Clinical Outcomes and Costs Between the Robotic and Open Technique in a Single Institution , 2017, Journal of laparoendoscopic & advanced surgical techniques. Part A.

[4]  Nazim Haouchine,et al.  Patient-Specific Biomechanical Modeling for Guidance During Minimally-Invasive Hepatic Surgery , 2015, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[5]  Michael I Miga,et al.  Evaluation of model-based deformation correction in image-guided liver surgery via tracked intraoperative ultrasound , 2016, Journal of medical imaging.

[6]  Michael I Miga,et al.  Characterization and correction of intraoperative soft tissue deformation in image-guided laparoscopic liver surgery , 2017, Journal of medical imaging.

[7]  Yasuhiko Nagano,et al.  Outcome after hepatic resection versus combined resection and microwave ablation for multiple bilobar colorectal metastases to the liver. , 2006, Surgery.

[8]  Brice Gayet,et al.  Laparoscopic Compared to Open Repeat Hepatectomy for Colorectal Liver Metastases: a Multi-institutional Propensity-Matched Analysis of Short- and Long-Term Outcomes , 2017, World Journal of Surgery.

[9]  David J. Hawkes,et al.  Global rigid registration of CT to video in laparoscopic liver surgery , 2018, International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery.

[10]  Lena Maier-Hein,et al.  Projective biomechanical depth matching for soft tissue registration in laparoscopic surgery , 2017, International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery.

[11]  Stefan Wesarg,et al.  Accurate Physics-Based Registration for the Outcome Validation of Minimal Invasive Interventions and Open Liver Surgeries , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[12]  Stéphane Cotin,et al.  Intraoperative Biomechanical Registration of the Liver: Does the Heterogeneity of the Liver Matter? , 2017 .

[13]  Michael I. Miga,et al.  Improving Registration Robustness for Image-Guided Liver Surgery in a Novel Human-to-Phantom Data Framework , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[14]  Stephane Cotin,et al.  Fast elastic registration of soft tissues under large deformations , 2018, Medical Image Anal..

[15]  Takashi Mizuno,et al.  Two-Stage Hepatectomy vs One-Stage Major Hepatectomy with Contralateral Resection or Ablation for Advanced Bilobar Colorectal Liver Metastases. , 2018, Journal of the American College of Surgeons.

[16]  C. Dervenis,et al.  Selection criteria for liver resection in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma and chronic liver disease. , 2008, World journal of gastroenterology.

[17]  D. Caleb Rucker,et al.  A Mechanics-Based Nonrigid Registration Method for Liver Surgery Using Sparse Intraoperative Data , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[18]  E. Benedetti,et al.  Robotic liver surgery: results for 70 resections. , 2011, Surgery.

[19]  Ender Gunes Yegin,et al.  Progress in surgical and nonsurgical approaches for hepatocellular carcinoma treatment. , 2016, Hepatobiliary & pancreatic diseases international : HBPD INT.

[20]  Logan W. Clements,et al.  Robust surface registration using salient anatomical features for image-guided liver surgery: algorithm and validation. , 2008, Medical physics.