Memory for an imagined pathway and strategy effects in sighted and in totally congenitally blind individuals.

The literature reports mixed results on the imagery abilities of the blind, at times showing a difference between sighted and blind individuals and at other times similarities. However, the possibility that the results are due to different strategies spontaneously used in performing the imagery tasks has never been systematically studied. A large group of 30 totally congenitally blind (TCB) individuals and a group of 30 sighted individuals matched for gender age and schooling were presented with a mental pathway task on a complex two-dimensional (5 x 5) matrix. After administering the task, participants were interviewed in order to establish the strategy they used. Results showed that both sighted and TCB may use a spatial mental imagery, a verbal or a mixed strategy in carrying out the task. Differences between the groups emerged only when last location and then entire pathway had to be remembered rather than just the last position, and were clearly affected by the type of strategy. Specifically, TCB performed more poorly than the sighted individuals when they used a spatial mental imagery strategy, whereas the two groups had a similar performance with a verbal strategy.

[1]  C. Cornoldi,et al.  Processing Capacity Limitations in Pictorial and Spatial Representations in the Totally Congenitally Blind , 1993, Cortex.

[2]  Richard A. Salome,et al.  The Visual Experience , 1990 .

[3]  Sergio Della Sala,et al.  Tall tales about the mind and brain : separating fact from fiction , 2007 .

[4]  C. Cornoldi,et al.  The effects of imagery instructions on total congenital blind recall , 1989 .

[5]  F. Attneave,et al.  Locational representation in imagery: a moving spot task. , 1983, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[6]  K. A. Ericsson,et al.  Protocol analysis: Verbal reports as data, Rev. ed. , 1993 .

[7]  P. Pietrini,et al.  Imagery and spatial processes in blindness and visual impairment , 2008, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews.

[8]  C. Cornoldi,et al.  Individual differences in the capacity limitations of visuospatial short-term memory: Research on sighted and totally congenitally blind people , 1991, Memory & cognition.

[9]  Mark Holllns,et al.  Spatial updating in blind and sighted people , 1988, Perception & psychophysics.

[10]  J. Rieser,et al.  Visual experience, visual field size, and the development of nonvisual sensitivity to the spatial structure of outdoor neighborhoods explored by walking. , 1992, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[11]  L. Lumbelli,et al.  The Reflection-Response in Enhancing Argumentation Ability , 2005 .

[12]  Z. Pylyshyn Seeing and Visualizing: It's Not What You Think , 2003 .

[13]  David G. Pearson,et al.  The generation and transformation of visuo-spatial mental images , 2001 .

[14]  Albert Postma,et al.  The Influence of Visual Experience on Visual and Spatial Imagery , 2007, Perception.

[15]  A. Kappers,et al.  Differences between Early-Blind, Late-Blind, and Blindfolded-Sighted People in Haptic Spatial-Configuration Learning and Resulting Memory Traces , 2007, Perception.

[16]  Marie-Chantal Wanet-Defalque,et al.  Abilities and strategies of blind and sighted subjects in visuo-spatial imagery. , 2004, Acta psychologica.

[17]  Catharine Abell,et al.  Seeing and Visualizing: It's Not What You Think , 2005 .

[18]  D. Kaski Revision: Is Visual Perception a Requisite for Visual Imagery? , 2002, Perception.

[19]  J. Keenan,et al.  Imagery in the congenitally blind: how visual are visual images? , 1983, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[20]  N H Kerr,et al.  Locational representation in imagery: The third dimension , 1987, Memory & cognition.

[21]  Rossana de Beni,et al.  Imagery limitations in totally congenitally blind subjects. , 1988, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[22]  N. Kerr Rate of imagery processing in two versus three dimensions , 1993, Memory & cognition.

[23]  R. Klatzky,et al.  Performance of Blind and Sighted Persons on Spatial Tasks , 1995 .

[24]  Interindividual Differences in Learning Performance: The Effects of Age, Intelligence, and Strategic Task Approach , 2006 .

[25]  Cesare Cornoldi,et al.  Spatial memory and integration processes in congenital blindness , 2004, Neuroreport.

[26]  S. Hillyard,et al.  Improved auditory spatial tuning in blind humans , 1999, Nature.

[27]  S. Rauch,et al.  Spontaneous and directed application of verbal learning strategies in bipolar disorder and obsessive-compulsive disorder. , 2005, Bipolar disorders.

[28]  F. Rösler,et al.  Event-related potentials during auditory language processing in congenitally blind and sighted people , 2000, Neuropsychologia.

[29]  R N Haber,et al.  Comparison of Nine Methods of Indicating the Direction to Objects: Data from Blind Adults , 1993, Perception.

[30]  Michel Denis,et al.  Imagery, language, and visuo-spatial thinking , 2001 .

[31]  A. Reber,et al.  The Assessment of Cognitive Procedural Learning in Amnesia: Why the Tower of Hanoi Has Fallen Down , 2001, Brain and Cognition.

[32]  M. Wanet-Defalque,et al.  Representation of locomotor space by the blind , 1987, Perception & psychophysics.

[33]  Romedi Passini,et al.  The Spatio-Cognitive Abilities of the Visually Impaired Population , 1990 .