Modern chemical analysis in archaeometry

All communities, in diverse ways, attempt to preserve their cultural heritage, as it is the main element of their identity within modern civilization. The different directions and ways in which these processes are realized depend on the particular stage of development of science and technology, welfare of society, and encountered dangers of this identity. Very important objects of cultural heritage are material objects and objects of art produced by all communities. The physical and mechanical properties of material culture are always of prime concern to archaeometry and science-based archaeology. The preservation of material culture for future generations with the best possible fidelity requires in-depth knowledge, to aid the most suitable restoration, conservation, storage, and eventual museum display. A wise utilization of modern methods of chemical analysis is a significant element of research studies into such objects providing information on the most suitable methods of their restoration and conservation. There is wide enthusiasm among conservators and curators for the application of analytical tools to enhance the management of collections. Modern chemical analysis offers numerous methods and measuring techniques which can be employed for archaeometric purposes. Advances in their use have already been the subject of several books [1–4], review papers [5–7], and even recent special issues of analytical international journals, e.g., X-Ray Spectrometry in 2000, Journal of Separation Science in 2004, or Microchimica Acta in 2007. From the point of view of application to an investigation of archeological and art objects, it is often important to use both nondestructive (which can be in some cases fully noninvasive) methods as well as destructive methods of modern microanalysis for analysis of small samples. As information about given objects or artistic techniques based only on historical sources may often lead to serious misinterpretations, there are numerous different purposes for the application of chemical analysis in archaeometric studies. They may be extremely valuable in the investigation of the provenance of an object and the origin of the materials used for its manufacture, and in addition in determining its degradation state and monitoring the transformations that happen during the ageing process. They are also useful when choosing the most suitable methods of restoration and conservation, the type of materials for conservation, and also in monitoring the progress of conservation processes. Various analytical methods can also be employed for dating of material objects and identification of fake art objects. Earlier works in this field concentrated mainly on analysis of inorganic materials [1]; however, in the last two decades substantial progress in high-performance separation techniques has allowed detailed determinations of various groups of organic compounds essential for materials studies (dyes, resins, oils, waxes, carbohydrates, and proteins) [8]. Nondestructive methods find a particular place among analytical methods used for archaeometric purposes because of the unique value of most of the objects analyzed. Their principal advantage is the lack of necessity for sampling from objects, and in the case of modern portable instrumentation there is also the possibility of performing measurements on-site. Most commonly these methods are employed for elemental analysis, but in recent decades they have also Anal Bioanal Chem (2008) 391:915–918 DOI 10.1007/s00216-008-2077-x

[1]  N. L. Owen,et al.  Wood used by Stradivari and Guarneri , 2006, Nature.

[2]  Julian Henderson,et al.  The Science and Archaeology of Materials: An Investigation of Inorganic Materials , 2001 .

[3]  Christian Rolando,et al.  Identification of proteins in renaissance paintings by proteomics. , 2006, Analytical chemistry.

[4]  D. Creagh The characterization of artefacts of cultural heritage significance using physical techniques , 2005 .

[5]  M. Colombini,et al.  Combined GC/MS analytical procedure for the characterization of glycerolipid, waxy, resinous, and proteinaceous materials in a unique paint microsample. , 2006, Analytical chemistry.

[6]  Manfred Anders,et al.  Nondestructive analysis and dating of historical paper based on IR spectroscopy and chemometric data evaluation. , 2007, Analytical chemistry.

[7]  I. Surowiec,et al.  Chromatographic Investigation of Dyes Extracted from Coptic Textiles from the National Museum in Warsaw , 2004 .

[8]  René Van Grieken,et al.  Cultural heritage conservation and environmental impact assessment by non-destructive testing and micro-analysis , 2004 .

[9]  S. L. Vallance Critical ReviewApplications of Chromatography in Art Conservation: Techniques Used for the Analysis and Identification of Proteinaceous and Gum Binding Media , 1997 .

[10]  E. Ciliberto,et al.  Modern analytical methods in art and archaeology , 2000 .

[11]  G. Zachariadis,et al.  Development and optimisation of a portable micro-XRF method for in situ multi-element analysis of ancient ceramics. , 2006, Talanta.

[12]  M. Doménech-Carbó,et al.  Chemometric study of Maya Blue from the voltammetry of microparticles approach. , 2007, Analytical chemistry.

[13]  S. Agostini,et al.  Potentialities of XRF and EIS portable instruments for the characterisation of ancient artefacts , 2006 .

[14]  A. Bouquillon,et al.  Quantitative elemental analysis of Della Robbia glazes with a portable XRF spectrometer and its comparison to PIXE methods , 2006 .

[15]  U. Baumer,et al.  Embalming in the Old Kingdom of Pharaonic Egypt. , 1998, Analytical chemistry.

[16]  Koen Janssens,et al.  Non-destructive Micro Analysis of Cultural Heritage Materials , 2004 .

[17]  Hongjie Luo,et al.  A study of provenance and dating of ancient Chinese porcelain by x‐ray fluorescence spectrometry , 2000 .

[18]  A. Tchapla,et al.  Headspace solid phase microextraction for screening for the presence of resins in Egyptian archaeological samples. , 2004, Journal of separation science.

[19]  Raymond White,et al.  The organic chemistry of museum objects , 1987 .

[20]  M. Colombini,et al.  Integrated analytical techniques for the study of ancient Greek polychromy. , 2004, Talanta.

[21]  Bernhard Blümich,et al.  Non-invasive spatial tissue discrimination in ancient mummies and bones in situ by portable nuclear magnetic resonance , 2007 .

[22]  Roberto Bugini,et al.  Black limestone used in Lombard architecture , 2002 .

[23]  I. V. Berghe,et al.  High-performance liquid chromatography and non-destructive three-dimensional fluorescence analysis of early synthetic dyes. , 2007, Journal of chromatography. A.

[24]  Manfred Schreiner,et al.  X‐ray fluorescence spectrometry in art and archaeology , 2000 .

[25]  F. Vanhaecke,et al.  Development of a new method for Pb isotopic analysis of archaeological artefacts using single-collector ICP-dynamic reaction cell-MS , 2008 .

[26]  G. Stingeder,et al.  Characterisation of ancient and art nouveau glass samples by Pb isotopic analysis using laser ablation coupled to a magnetic sector field inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometer (LA-ICP-SF-MS) , 2004 .

[27]  J. Csapó,et al.  Use of amino acids and their racemisation for age determination in archaeometry , 1998 .

[28]  R. Laursen,et al.  Development of mild extraction methods for the analysis of natural dyes in textiles of historical interest using LC-diode array detector-MS. , 2005, Analytical chemistry.

[29]  Emmanuel Pantos,et al.  A comparison of microbeam techniques for the analysis of corroded ancient bronze objects , 2003 .

[30]  M. Regert,et al.  Identification of archaeological adhesives using direct inlet electron ionization mass spectrometry. , 2002, Analytical chemistry.