The Effects of Design Attributes on Other Attributes and Product Evaluation

This study examines how consumers’ perceptions of a product’s design attributes influence their perceptions on other product attributes, and attitudes toward the focal product. This study explored image-related adjectives in order to analyze product attributes, which are categorized into design, symbolic, and functional factors. The empirical test results confirmed the mediating role of attitudes toward design, which indicate the overall preference about product design, between design attributes and attitudes toward product, while the hypothesis of the moderating role of design sensitivity was not supported. These findings revealed that design attributes have influences beyond the aesthetic value, as product design rouses symbolic value and delivers information about functions. Therefore, in the context of product development process, it would be effective to distinguish design elements that can strengthen advantages and * Corresponding author, Professor of Marketing, College of Business Administration, Seoul National University, #58-612, 1 Gwanak-Ro, Gwanak-Gu, Seoul 151-916, Korea. Email: profkim@snu.ac.kr, Phone: +82-2-880-6934 ** Doctoral candidate, College of Business Administration, Seoul National University, Email: muse710@naver.com *** Master student, College of Business Administration, Seoul National University, Email: yehahm@gmail.com 2 Seoul Journal of Business supplement weaknesses and to measure attitudes toward design that can be an important index of product evaluation.

[1]  William R. Darden,et al.  Work and/or Fun: Measuring Hedonic and Utilitarian Shopping Value , 1994 .

[2]  Mel Yamamoto,et al.  The impact of product aesthetics on the evaluation of industrial products , 1994 .

[3]  Howard L. Fromkin,et al.  Uniqueness, the human pursuit of difference , 1980 .

[4]  Todd J. Arnold,et al.  Individual Differences in the Centrality of Visual Product Aesthetics: Concept and Measurement , 2003 .

[5]  Deanna S. Kempf Attitude formation from product trial: Distinct roles of cognition and affect for hedonic and functional products , 1999 .

[6]  M. Holbrook,et al.  The Chain of Effects from Brand Trust and Brand Affect to Brand Performance: The Role of Brand Loyalty , 2001 .

[7]  Morris B. Holbrook,et al.  The Effects of Situation, Sequence, and Features on Perceptual and Affective Responses to Product Designs: The Case of Aesthetic Consumption , 1992 .

[8]  Tom Peters,et al.  Marketing Aesthetics: The Strategic Management of Brands, Identity and Image , 1997 .

[9]  P. Kotler,et al.  DESIGN: A POWERFUL BUT NEGLECTED STRATEGIC TOOL , 1984 .

[10]  Robert W. Veryzer The Place of Product Design and Aesthetics in Consumer Research , 1995 .

[11]  R. Clarke,et al.  Hot products , 1999 .

[12]  Mary Jo Bitner,et al.  Servicescapes: The Impact of Physical Surroundings on Customers and Employees: , 1992 .

[13]  Scott B. MacKenzie,et al.  The Role of Attitude toward the Ad as a Mediator of Advertising Effectiveness: A Test of Competing Explanations: , 1986 .

[14]  Ulrich R. Orth,et al.  Holistic Package Design and Consumer Brand Impressions , 2008 .

[15]  Peter H. Bloch Seeking the Ideal Form: Product Design and Consumer Response , 1995 .

[16]  P. Parker,et al.  Marketing universals: Consumers' use of brand name, price, physical appearance, and retailer , 1994 .

[17]  J. W. Hutchinson,et al.  The Influence of Unity and Prototypicality on Aesthetic Responses to New Product Designs , 1998 .

[18]  Sarah Blake,et al.  Form , 2016, The Fairchild Books Dictionary of Fashion.

[19]  R. Lennox,et al.  Revision of the self-monitoring scale. , 1984, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[20]  E. Hirschman,et al.  The Experiential Aspects of Consumption: Consumer Fantasies, Feelings, and Fun , 1982 .

[21]  Mariëlle E. H. Creusen,et al.  The Different Roles of Product Appearance in Consumer Choice , 2005 .

[22]  R. E. Robinson,et al.  The art of seeing : an interpretation of the aesthetic encounter , 1993 .

[23]  Grant Mccracken Culture and Consumption: A Theoretical Account of the Structure and Movement of the Cultural Meaning of Consumer Goods , 1986 .

[24]  V. Mahajan,et al.  Delight by Design: The Role of Hedonic versus Utilitarian Benefits , 2008 .

[25]  Marvin Berkowitz,et al.  Product shape as a design innovation strategy , 1987 .

[26]  Morris B. Holbrook,et al.  Some Preliminary Notes on Research in Consumer Esthetics , 1980 .

[27]  R. Bagozzi,et al.  The social psychology of consumer behaviour , 2002 .

[28]  Merle Crawford,et al.  Design that sells and sells and , 1992 .

[29]  Michaela Wänke,et al.  Social Psychology of Consumer Behavior , 2008 .

[30]  Charles H. Noble,et al.  Exploring the Appeal of Product Design: A Grounded, Value‐Based Model of Key Design Elements and Relationships* , 2010 .

[31]  E. Hirschman,et al.  Hedonic Consumption: Emerging Concepts, Methods and Propositions , 1982 .

[32]  D. Midgley Innovation And New Product Marketing , 1977 .

[33]  R. Batra,et al.  Measuring the hedonic and utilitarian sources of consumer attitudes , 1991 .