Choosing small sets of policy-relevant scenarios by combining vulnerability and diversity approaches

Computer simulation models can generate large numbers of scenarios, far more than can be effectively utilized in most decision support applications. How can one best select a small number of scenarios to consider? One approach calls for choosing scenarios that illuminate vulnerabilities of proposed policies. Another calls for choosing scenarios that span a diverse range of futures. This paper joins these two approaches for the first time, proposing an optimization-based method for choosing a small number of relevant scenarios that combine both vulnerability and diversity. The paper applies the method to a real case involving climate resilient infrastructure for three African river basins (Volta, Orange and Zambezi). Introducing selection criteria in a stepwise manner helps examine how different criteria influence the choice of scenarios. The results suggest that combining vulnerability- and diversity-based criteria can provide a systematic and transparent method for scenario selection. Describes an optimization-based method for choosing a small number of scenarios.A combination of criteria related to vulnerability and diversity is used.The method is applied to a real case involving climate resilient infrastructure.

[1]  J. Edmonds,et al.  A new scenario framework for climate change research: background, process, and future directions , 2013, Climatic Change.

[2]  Céline Guivarch,et al.  Building SSPs for climate policy analysis: a scenario elicitation methodology to map the space of possible future challenges to mitigation and adaptation , 2012, Climatic Change.

[3]  Angela Wilkinson,et al.  How plausibility-based scenario practices are grappling with complexity to appreciate and address 21st century challenges , 2013 .

[4]  Bengt Johansson,et al.  Systematic exploration of scenario spaces , 2016 .

[5]  Daniel J. Lang,et al.  Scenarios for the implementation of EU waste legislation at national level and their consequences for emissions from municipal waste incineration , 2011 .

[6]  R. L. Keeney,et al.  Decisions with Multiple Objectives: Preferences and Value Trade-Offs , 1977, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics.

[7]  Olaf Tietje,et al.  Identification of a small reliable and efficient set of consistent scenarios , 2005, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[8]  George Wright,et al.  The origins and evolution of scenario techniques in long range business planning , 2005 .

[9]  A. McMichael,et al.  Ecosystems and Human well-being , 2003 .

[10]  P. Burger.  Embedded Case Study Methods: Integrating Quantitative and Qualitative Knowledge , 2001 .

[11]  Olaf Helmer,et al.  Reassessment of cross-impact analysis , 1981 .

[12]  T. Ritchey,et al.  Problem structuring using computer-aided morphological analysis , 2006, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[13]  Vanessa J. Schweizer,et al.  Systematic construction of global socioeconomic pathways using internally consistent element combinations , 2014, Climatic Change.

[14]  Wolfgang Weimer-Jehle,et al.  Familial and societal causes of juvenile obesity—a qualitative model on obesity development and prevention in socially disadvantaged children and adolescents , 2012, Journal of Public Health.

[15]  Mark E. Borsuk,et al.  Discovering plausible energy and economic futures under global change using multidimensional scenario discovery , 2013, Environ. Model. Softw..

[16]  K. Riahi,et al.  The roads ahead: Narratives for shared socioeconomic pathways describing world futures in the 21st century , 2017 .

[17]  G. Finnveden,et al.  Scenario types and techniques: Towards a user's guide , 2006 .

[18]  Per Wikman-Svahn,et al.  Tailor-made scenario planning for local adaptation to climate change , 2013, Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change.

[19]  T. Stocker,et al.  Managing the Risks of Extreme Events and Disasters to Advance Climate Change Adaptation. A Special Report of Working Groups I and II of IPCC Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change , 2012 .

[20]  David G. Groves,et al.  Adapting to a Changing Colorado River Making Future Water Deliveries More Reliable Through Robust Management Strategies , 2013 .

[21]  Rg Coyle,et al.  Futures assessment by field anomaly relaxation: A review and appraisal , 1994 .

[22]  T. Gordon,et al.  Initial experiments with the cross impact matrix method of forecasting , 1968 .

[23]  Lutz E. Schlange.  Scenarios: The art of strategic conversation , 1997 .

[24]  Wolfgang Weimer-Jehle,et al.  Cross-impact balances: A system-theoretical approach to cross-impact analysis , 2006 .

[25]  Peter Schwartz,et al.  The Art of the Long View: Planning for the Future in an Uncertain World , 1996 .

[26]  J. Alcamo,et al.  Scenarios as Tools for International Environmental Assessments , 2002 .

[27]  H. Kahn,et al.  The Year 2000: A Framework for Speculation on the Next Thirty-Three Years, , 1967 .

[28]  David G. Groves,et al.  Climate Change Projections in Africa , 2015 .

[29]  Alexander Fink,et al.  Scenario Management: An Approach to Develop Future Potentials , 1998 .

[30]  Joeri Rogelj,et al.  Halfway to Copenhagen, no way to 2 °C , 2009 .

[31]  Robert J. Lempert,et al.  Evaluating Simulation-Derived Scenarios for Effective Decision Support , 2015 .

[32]  Benjamin P. Bryant,et al.  Thinking Inside the Box , 2010 .

[33]  Rikard Liden,et al.  Enhancing the climate resilience of Africa's infrastructure : the power and water sectors , 2015 .

[34]  Dale S. Rothman,et al.  Multi-scale narratives from an IA perspective: Part II. Participatory local scenario development , 2006 .

[35]  A. Thomson,et al.  The representative concentration pathways: an overview , 2011 .

[36]  Robert J. Lempert,et al.  Scenarios that illuminate vulnerabilities and robust responses , 2013, Climatic Change.

[37]  C. Tebaldi,et al.  Long-term Climate Change: Projections, Commitments and Irreversibility , 2013 .

[38]  Alexei G. Sankovski,et al.  Special report on emissions scenarios , 2000 .

[39]  Peter C. Bishop,et al.  The current state of scenario development: an overview of techniques , 2007 .

[40]  Michel Godet,et al.  The Art of Scenarios and Strategic Planning - Tools and Pitfalls , 2000 .

[41]  Jan H. Kwakkel,et al.  Dynamic scenario discovery under deep uncertainty: The future of copper , 2013 .

[42]  David G. Groves,et al.  A New Analytic Method for Finding Policy-Relevant Scenarios: , 2007 .

[43]  F. Zwicky.  Discovery, Invention, Research through the morphological approach , 1969 .

[44]  Joseph Alcamo,et al.  Chapter Six The SAS Approach: Combining Qualitative and Quantitative Knowledge in Environmental Scenarios , 2008 .

[45]  Myles T. Collins,et al.  Managing the Risk of Uncertain Threshold Responses: Comparison of Robust, Optimum, and Precautionary Approaches , 2007, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[46]  Wolfgang Lucht,et al.  Tipping elements in the Earth's climate system , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[47]  Ralph L. Keeney,et al.  Decisions with multiple objectives: preferences and value tradeoffs , 1976 .

[48]  Eric Kemp-Benedict.  Telling better stories: strengthening the story in story and simulation , 2012 .

[49]  Elmar Kriegler,et al.  Improving environmental change research with systematic techniques for qualitative scenarios , 2012 .

[50]  R. Betts,et al.  When could global warming reach 4°C? , 2011, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[51]  R. Lempert,et al.  Shaping the Next One Hundred Years: New Methods for Quantitative Long-Term Policy Analysis , 2003 .

[52]  Mark Rounsevell,et al.  Developing qualitative scenario storylines for environmental change assessment , 2010 .

[53]  Grégoire Meylan,et al.  Eco-efficiency assessment of options for metal recovery from incineration residues: a conceptual framework. , 2014, Waste management.