Knowledge conversion capability and the performance of corporate and university spin-offs

Corporate and university spin-offs are often created to commercialize new technologies. Yet, it is not clear how these spin-offs transform their inventions into new products, goods and services that create value. In this article, we use the knowledge-based theory to argue that this transformation requires a "knowledge conversion capability" (KCC) that has three components: conceptualization and visioning of applications of that knowledge; configuration and design of potential products and other applications; and the embodiment and integration of knowledge into products. Using data from 91 corporate and 78 university spin-offs, we find that these two sets of firms differ in their emphasis on the three KCC components, benefit differentially from these three components in terms of their performance, and vary significantly in their performance.

[1]  Junfu Zhang,et al.  The performance of university spin-offs: an exploratory analysis using venture capital data , 2009 .

[2]  M. Wright,et al.  The Technology Endowments of Spin-off Companies , 2008 .

[3]  Glenn R. Carroll,et al.  The fates of De Novo and De Alio producers in the American Automobile Industry 1885–1981 , 2007 .

[4]  Elizabeth L. Rose,et al.  The genealogical structure of Japanese firms: parent-subsidiary relationships , 2007 .

[5]  G. Hedlund.  A model of knowledge management and the N‐form corporation , 2007 .

[6]  S. Zahra,et al.  Entrepreneurship and Dynamic Capabilities: A Review, Model and Research Agenda , 2006 .

[7]  Bart Clarysse,et al.  A Model of Antecedents and Characteristics of Corporate Spin-Offs , 2006 .

[8]  Mike Wright,et al.  Conceptualising the heterogeneity of research-based spin-offs: A multi-dimensional taxonomy , 2006 .

[9]  B. Clarysse,et al.  Institutional change and resource endowments to science-based entrepreneurial firms , 2005 .

[10]  Joshua B. Powers,et al.  Policy orientation effects on performance with licensing to start-ups and small companies , 2005 .

[11]  Peter T. Gianiodis,et al.  Innovation speed: Transferring university technology to market , 2005 .

[12]  Mike Wright,et al.  The creation of spin-off firms at public research institutions: Managerial and policy implications , 2005 .

[13]  Albert N. Link,et al.  Opening the ivory tower's door: An analysis of the determinants of the formation of U.S. university spin-off companies , 2005 .

[14]  T. Allen,et al.  Entrepreneurial orientation, technology transfer and spinoff performance of U.S. universities , 2005 .

[15]  Mike Wright,et al.  Resources, capabilities, risk capital and the creation of university spin-out companies , 2005 .

[16]  Phillip H. Phan,et al.  Analyzing the Effectiveness of University Technology Transfer: Implications for Entrepreneurship Education , 2005 .

[17]  Steven Klepper,et al.  Entry by Spinoffs , 2005, Manag. Sci..

[18]  David B. Balkin,et al.  Entrepreneurship and university-based technology transfer , 2005 .

[19]  S. Dutta,et al.  Strategic Management Journal Research Notes and Commentaries Conceptualizing and Measuring Capabilities: Methodology and Empirical Application , 2022 .

[20]  M. Wright,et al.  Spinning Out New Ventures: A Typology of Incubation Strategies from European Research Institutions , 2005 .

[21]  Andrew C. Inkpen,et al.  Social Capital, Networks, and Knowledge Transfer , 2005 .

[22]  Charles W. L. Hill,et al.  Technological Discontinuities and Complementary Assets: A Longitudinal Study of Industry and Firm Performance , 2005, Organ. Sci..

[23]  E. Autio,et al.  Knowledge relatedness and post-spin-off growth , 2004 .

[24]  Thomas Keil,et al.  Building External Corporate Venturing Capability , 2004 .

[25]  Mike Wright,et al.  The Formation of High-Tech University Spinouts: The Role of Joint Ventures and Venture Capital Investors , 2004 .

[26]  April Franco,et al.  KNOWLEDGE TRANSFER THROUGH INHERITANCE: SPIN- OUT GENERATION, DEVELOPMENT, AND SURVIVAL , 2004 .

[27]  Elizabeth Garnsey,et al.  Do Academic Spin-Outs Differ and Does it Matter? , 2004 .

[28]  B. Clarysse,et al.  How and Why do Research-Based Start-Ups Differ at Founding? A Resource-Based Configurational Perspective , 2004 .

[29]  Erwin Danneels.  Disruptive Technology Reconsidered: A Critique and Research Agenda , 2004 .

[30]  Simon Rodan,et al.  More than Network Structure: How Knowledge Heterogeneity Influences Managerial Performance and Innovativeness , 2004 .

[31]  Scott Shane,et al.  Academic Entrepreneurship: University Spinoffs and Wealth Creation , 2004 .

[32]  Mike Wright,et al.  Critical junctures in the development of university high-tech spinout companies , 2004 .

[33]  Michael E. Raynor,et al.  The Innovator's Solution: Creating and Sustaining Successful Growth , 2003 .

[34]  Sue Birley,et al.  Academic networks in a trichotomous categorisation of university spinouts , 2003 .

[35]  Annaleena Parhankangas,et al.  From a corporate venture to an independent company: a base for a taxonomy for corporate spin-off firms , 2003 .

[36]  Richard N. Cardozo,et al.  A theory of entrepreneurial opportunity identification and development , 2003 .

[37]  H. Chesbrough.  The Governance and Performance of Xerox's Technology Spin-Off Companies , 2003 .

[38]  Damon J. Phillips.  A Genealogical Approach to Organizational Life Chances: The Parent-Progeny Transfer among Silicon Valley Law Firms, 1946–1996 , 2002 .

[39]  Steven Klepper,et al.  The capabilities of new firms and the evolution of the US automobile industry , 2002 .

[40]  Constance E. Helfat,et al.  The birth of capabilities: market entry and the importance of pre-history , 2002 .

[41]  Haiyang Li,et al.  The adoption of agency business activity, product innovation, and performance in Chinese technology ventures , 2002 .

[42]  J. Meijaard,et al.  Spin-off start-ups in the Netherlands , 2002 .

[43]  S. Zahra,et al.  Sources of capabilities, integration and technology commercialization , 2002 .

[44]  S. Zahra,et al.  Absorptive Capacity: A Review, Reconceptualization, and Extension , 2002 .

[45]  Karen Hopper Wruck,et al.  Restructuring Top Management: Evidence from Corporate Spinoffs , 2001, Journal of Labor Economics.

[46]  P. Adler,et al.  Social Capital: Prospects for a New Concept , 2002 .

[47]  Markku V. J. Maula.  Corporate venture capital and the value-added for technology-based new firms , 2001 .

[48]  J. Barney.  Resource-based theories of competitive advantage: A ten-year retrospective on the resource-based view , 2001 .

[49]  S. Klepper.  Employee Startups in High‐Tech Industries , 2001 .

[50]  J. Brown,et al.  Knowledge and Organization: A Social-Practice Perspective , 2001 .

[51]  Dorothy E. Leidner,et al.  Review: Knowledge Management and Knowledge Management Systems: Conceptual Foundations and Research Issues , 2001, MIS Q..

[52]  Åsa Lindholm Dahlstrand,et al.  Entrepreneurial Origin and Spin-Off Performance: A Comparison between Corporate and University Spin-offs , 2001 .

[53]  Mike Wright,et al.  Academic and Surrogate Entrepreneurs in University Spin-out Companies , 2001 .

[54]  Steven Klepper,et al.  Dominance by birthright: entry of prior radio producers and competitive ramifications in the U. S. , 2000 .

[55]  Tom Elfring,et al.  Competence building. Understanding the role of internal venturing and spin -offs , 2000 .

[56]  J. Brown,et al.  Bridging epistemologies: The generative dance between organizational knowledge and organizational knowing , 1999, STUDI ORGANIZZATIVI.

[57]  W. Bogner,et al.  Corporate Entrepreneurship, Knowledge, and Competence Development , 1999 .

[58]  S. Ghoshal,et al.  Social Capital and Value Creation: The Role of Intrafirm Networks , 1998 .

[59]  Clayton M. Christensen.  The Innovator's Dilemma: When New Technologies Cause Great Firms to Fail , 2013 .

[60]  Åsa Lindholm Dahlstrand,et al.  Growth and inventiveness in technology-based spin-off firms , 1997 .

[61]  Å. Dahlstrand.  Entrepreneurial spin‐off enterprises in Göteborg, Sweden , 1997 .

[62]  Constance E. Helfat,et al.  Know-how and asset complementarity and dynamic capability accumulation : The case of R&D , 1997 .

[63]  W. Boeker.  Strategic Change: The Influence Of Managerial Characteristics And Organizational Growth , 1997 .

[64]  R. Grant.  Toward a Knowledge-Based Theory of the Firm,” Strategic Management Journal (17), pp. , 1996 .

[65]  Clayton M. Christensen,et al.  CUSTOMER POWER, STRATEGIC INVESTMENT, AND THE FAILURE OF LEADING FIRMS , 1996 .

[66]  Rita Gunther McGrath,et al.  Innovation, competitive advantage and rent: a model and test , 1996 .

[67]  Karl T. Ulrich,et al.  Product Design and Development , 1995 .

[68]  I. Nonaka,et al.  The Knowledge Creating Company , 2008 .

[69]  C. Prahalad,et al.  Competing for the Future , 1994 .

[70]  Helena M. M. Lastres,et al.  Emerging Patterns of Innovation: Sources of Japan's Technological Edge , 1994 .

[71]  Zenas Block,et al.  Corporate Venturing: Creating New Businesses Within the Firm , 1993 .

[72]  P. Schoemaker,et al.  Strategic assets and organizational rent , 1993 .

[73]  Urs Daellenbach,et al.  Spin‐off performance: A case of overstated expectations? , 1992 .

[74]  B. Kogut,et al.  Knowledge of the Firm, Combinative Capabilities, and the Replication of Technology , 1992 .

[75]  Jérôme Doutriaux,et al.  Emerging high-tech firms: How durable are their comparative start-up advantages?☆ , 1992 .

[76]  John A. Pearce,et al.  Business unit relatedness and performance: A look at the pulp and paper industry , 1992 .

[77]  J. Barney.  Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage , 1991 .

[78]  C. Marlene Fiol,et al.  Managing Culture as a Competitive Resource: An Identity-Based View of Sustainable Competitive Advantage , 1991 .

[79]  G. Huber.  Organizational Learning: The Contributing Processes and the Literatures , 1991 .

[80]  Edward B. Roberts,et al.  Entrepreneurs In High Technology , 1991 .

[81]  Elaine Romanelli,et al.  THE EVOLUTION OF NEW ORGANIZATIONAL FORMS , 1991 .

[82]  K. Eisenhardt,et al.  Speeding Products to Market: Waiting Time to First Product Introduction in New Firms. , 1990 .

[83]  David V. Gibson,et al.  University spin-out companies: Technology start-ups from UT-Austin , 1990 .

[84]  Karel Cool,et al.  Asset stock accumulation and sustainability of competitive advantage , 1989 .

[85]  Elaine Romanelli,et al.  Environments and Strategies of Organization Start-Up: Effects on Early Survival , 1989 .

[86]  D. Slevin,et al.  Strategic management of small firms in hostile and benign environments , 1989 .

[87]  J. McCalman.  Management of innovation in high technology small firms , 1988 .

[88]  James C. Anderson,et al.  STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELING IN PRACTICE: A REVIEW AND RECOMMENDED TWO-STEP APPROACH , 1988 .

[89]  P. M. Podsakoff,et al.  Self-Reports in Organizational Research: Problems and Prospects , 1986 .

[90]  C. Prahalad,et al.  The dominant logic: A new linkage between diversity and performance , 1986 .

[91]  Maurice Archer,et al.  Who is an entrepreneur , 2008 .

[92]  Michael T. Hannan,et al.  Where do organizational forms come from? , 1985 .

[93]  David A. Garvin,et al.  Spin-offs and the New Firm Formation Process , 1983 .

[94]  P. H. Friesen,et al.  Innovation in Conservative and Entrepreneurial Firms: Two Models of Strategic Momentum , 1982 .

[95]  Jacob Cohen,et al.  Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences , 1979 .

[96]  Arthur L. Stinchcombe,et al.  Organization-creating organizations , 1965 .