Commoditization of Biomass Markets

Abstract Commodities are intermediate goods available in standardized qualities that are traded on competitive and liquid international markets. In this chapter, we analyze the current status and trajectories in biomass markets to discern to what extent solid biomass fuels are becoming commoditized. We present five criteria that are key indicators in the process towards commoditization and market maturity. These indicators are then used as a framework to understand biomass market developments, with particular focus on wood pellet markets, and identify current obstacles to market maturity. We continuously draw comparisons with developments in fossil fuel markets with the dramatic developments in crude oil markets from the late 1960s to the mid-1980s used as a key example. In both the crude oil example and in the wood pellet discussion, the successful establishment of a futures contract is seen as a litmus test of the commoditization process. We find several similarities between historical and current fossil fuel markets and wood pellet markets in the reliance of vertical integration as a risk management tool and in how rigid fuel quality standards are perceived as obstacles to market liquidity. However, biomass markets also have particular characteristics that are not present in fossil fuel markets, especially the need for sustainability and traceability in supply chains. These are essential features of biomass fuels since their attractiveness to a very high degree relies on their being superior to fossil fuels in terms of lifecycle environmental performance. However, they do make the process of commoditization more difficult. For future discussions on biomass market developments, the tension here must be addressed.

[1]  Patrick Lamers,et al.  Developments in international solid biofuel trade—An analysis of volumes, policies, and market factors , 2012 .

[2]  Olle Olsson,et al.  European wood pellet market integration – A study of the residential sector , 2011 .

[3]  B. Kamm,et al.  Principles of biorefineries , 2004, Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology.

[4]  Bruce G. Carruthers,et al.  The social structure of liquidity: Flexibility, markets, and states , 1999 .

[5]  J. R. Hess,et al.  Optimization of Biomass Transport and Logistics , 2014 .

[6]  J. Mathews Towards a sustainably certifiable futures contract for biofuels , 2008 .

[7]  K. Siqueira,et al.  Viability of introducing milk futures contracts in Brazil: a multiple criteria decision analysis , 2008 .

[8]  A. Lima,et al.  Fairtrade and De-commoditization , 2014 .

[9]  Matthew H. Langholtz,et al.  Investigation of thermochemical biorefinery sizing and environmental sustainability impacts for conventional supply system and distributed pre‐processing supply system designs , 2014 .

[10]  Olle Olsson,et al.  Estonian‐Swedish wood fuel trade and market integration: a co‐integration approach , 2012 .

[11]  Christian von Hirschhausen,et al.  The Globalization of Steam Coal Markets and the Role of Logistics: An Empirical Analysis , 2009 .

[12]  O. Olsson,et al.  The wood fuel market in Denmark – Price development, market efficiency and internationalization , 2014 .

[13]  A. Cowie,et al.  The role of sustainability requirements in international bioenergy markets , 2014 .

[14]  Eric C. D. Tan,et al.  Investigation of biochemical biorefinery sizing and environmental sustainability impacts for conventional bale system and advanced uniform biomass logistics designs , 2013 .

[15]  Christian von Hirschhausen,et al.  International Market Integration for Natural Gas? A Cointegration Analysis of Prices in Europe, North America and Japan , 2005 .

[16]  Kes McCormick,et al.  The Bioeconomy in Europe: An Overview , 2013 .

[17]  O. Williamson Transaction-Cost Economics: The Governance of Contractual Relations , 1979, The Journal of Law and Economics.

[18]  B. Brorsen,et al.  Success and Failure of Agricultural Futures Contracts , 1998 .