Predicting toxic potencies of metal oxide nanoparticles by means of nano-QSARs

Abstract Background: The enormous physicochemical and structural diversity of metal oxide nanoparticles (MeONPs) poses significant challenges to the testing of their biological uptake, biodistribution, and effects that can be used to develop understanding of key nano-bio modes of action. This has generated considerable uncertainties in the assessment of their human health and environmental risks and has raised concerns about the adequacy of their regulation. In order to surpass the extremely resource intensive case-by-case testing, intelligent strategies combining testing methods and non-testing predictive modeling should be developed. Methods: The quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSARs) in silico tools can be instrumental in understanding properties that affect the potencies of MeONPs and in predicting toxic responses and thresholds of effects. Results: The present study proposes a predictive nano-QSAR model for predicting the cytotoxicity of MeONPs. The model was applied to test the relationships between 26 physicochemical properties of 51 MeONPs and their cytotoxic effects in Escherichia coli. The two parameters, enthalpy of formation of a gaseous cation (▵Hme+) and polarization force (Z/r), were elucidated to make a significant contribution for the toxic effect of these MeONPs. The study also proposed the mechanisms of toxic potency in E. coli through the model, which indicated that the MeONPs as well as their released metal ions could collectively induce DNA damage and cell apoptosis. Significance: These findings may provide an alternative method for prioritizing current and future MeONPs for potential in vivo testing, virtual prescreening and for designing environmentally benign nanomaterials.

[1]  P. Sil,et al.  Nanotoxicity: oxidative stress mediated toxicity of metal and metal oxide nanoparticles. , 2014, Journal of nanoscience and nanotechnology.

[2]  R. Weissleder,et al.  Modeling biological activities of nanoparticles. , 2012, Nano letters.

[3]  Jerzy Leszczynski,et al.  Metal Oxide Nanoparticles: Size-Dependence of Quantum-Mechanical Properties , 2012 .

[4]  Saji George,et al.  A predictive toxicological paradigm for the safety assessment of nanomaterials. , 2009, ACS nano.

[5]  Changyou Gao,et al.  Toxicity of ZnO nanoparticles to macrophages due to cell uptake and intracellular release of zinc ions. , 2014, Journal of nanoscience and nanotechnology.

[6]  Lutz Mädler,et al.  Use of metal oxide nanoparticle band gap to develop a predictive paradigm for oxidative stress and acute pulmonary inflammation. , 2012, ACS nano.

[7]  Wei Meng,et al.  China embarking on development of its own national water quality criteria system. , 2010, Environmental science & technology.

[8]  A. Neal,et al.  What can be inferred from bacterium–nanoparticle interactions about the potential consequences of environmental exposure to nanoparticles? , 2008, Ecotoxicology.

[9]  Kavitha Pathakoti,et al.  Using experimental data of Escherichia coli to develop a QSAR model for predicting the photo-induced cytotoxicity of metal oxide nanoparticles. , 2014, Journal of photochemistry and photobiology. B, Biology.

[10]  Paul S Weiss,et al.  Where Are We Heading in Nanotechnology Environmental Health and Safety and Materials Characterization? , 2015, ACS nano.

[11]  Fengchang Wu,et al.  Predicting criteria continuous concentrations of 34 metals or metalloids by use of quantitative ion character-activity relationships-species sensitivity distributions (QICAR-SSD) model. , 2014, Environmental pollution.

[12]  Linfeng Zheng,et al.  FasL Gene -844T/C Mutation of Esophageal Cancer in South China and Its Clinical Significance , 2014, Scientific Reports.

[13]  C. Baes,et al.  The hydrolysis of cations , 1986 .

[14]  Alexander Golbraikh,et al.  Rational selection of training and test sets for the development of validated QSAR models , 2003, J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des..

[15]  H. Wolterbeek,et al.  Predicting metal toxicity revisited: general properties vs. specific effects. , 2001, The Science of the total environment.

[16]  Bin Zhao,et al.  Demonstrating approaches to chemically modify the surface of Ag nanoparticles in order to influence their cytotoxicity and biodistribution after single dose acute intravenous administration , 2015, Nanotoxicology.

[17]  Anne Kahru,et al.  Toxicity of nanosized and bulk ZnO, CuO and TiO2 to bacteria Vibrio fischeri and crustaceans Daphnia magna and Thamnocephalus platyurus. , 2008, Chemosphere.

[18]  K. Kaiser.  Correlation and prediction of metal toxicity to aquatic biota. , 1980 .

[19]  Jerzy Leszczynski,et al.  Using nano-QSAR to predict the cytotoxicity of metal oxide nanoparticles. , 2011, Nature nanotechnology.

[20]  Richard D Handy,et al.  Physiological effects of nanoparticles on fish: a comparison of nanometals versus metal ions. , 2011, Environment international.

[21]  Naomi Lubick,et al.  Nanosilver toxicity: ions, nanoparticles--or both? , 2008, Environmental science & technology.

[22]  Lai‐Sheng Wang,et al.  Probing the electronic structure and band gap evolution of titanium oxide clusters (TiO(2))(n)(-) (n = 1-10) using photoelectron spectroscopy. , 2007, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[23]  Vincent M. Rotello,et al.  Applications of Nanoparticles in Biology , 2008 .

[24]  H. Kubinyi.  QSAR : Hansch analysis and related approaches , 1993 .

[25]  Bengt Fadeel,et al.  Size-dependent cytotoxicity of silver nanoparticles in human lung cells: the role of cellular uptake, agglomeration and Ag release , 2014, Particle and Fibre Toxicology.

[26]  Naomi Lubick,et al.  Risks of nanotechnology remain uncertain. , 2008, Environmental science & technology.

[27]  I. Hsiao,et al.  Trojan-horse mechanism in the cellular uptake of silver nanoparticles verified by direct intra- and extracellular silver speciation analysis. , 2015, Environmental science & technology.

[28]  R. Pearson.  The Nature of Metal-Halogen Bonds , 1967 .

[29]  K. Donaldson,et al.  Interactions between ultrafine particles and transition metals in vivo and in vitro. , 2002, Toxicology and applied pharmacology.

[30]  J. Topliss,et al.  Change correlations in structure-activity studies using multiple regression analysis. , 1972, Journal of Medicinal Chemistry.

[31]  Fengchang Wu,et al.  Derivation of marine water quality criteria for metals based on a novel QICAR-SSD model , 2015, Environmental Science and Pollution Research.

[32]  H. Karlsson,et al.  Copper oxide nanoparticles are highly toxic: a comparison between metal oxide nanoparticles and carbon nanotubes. , 2008, Chemical research in toxicology.

[33]  A. Erdemir,et al.  Relation of Certain Quantum Chemical Parameters to Lubrication Behavior of Solid Oxides , 2005 .

[34]  R. Marcos,et al.  New insights in the acute toxic/genotoxic effects of CuO nanoparticles in the in vivo Drosophila model , 2016, Nanotoxicology.

[35]  B. Xing,et al.  Concentration-dependent polyparameter linear free energy relationships to predict organic compound sorption on carbon nanotubes , 2014, Scientific Reports.

[36]  David M. Brown,et al.  Size-dependent proinflammatory effects of ultrafine polystyrene particles: a role for surface area and oxidative stress in the enhanced activity of ultrafines. , 2001, Toxicology and applied pharmacology.

[37]  M. C. Newman,et al.  Predicting the relative toxicity of metal ions using ion characteristics: Microtox® bioluminescence assay , 1996 .

[38]  J. Dearden,et al.  How not to develop a quantitative structure–activity or structure–property relationship (QSAR/QSPR) , 2009, SAR and QSAR in environmental research.

[39]  J. Topliss,et al.  Chance correlations in structure-activity studies using multiple regression analysis , 1972 .

[40]  Harshita Negi,et al.  In vitro assessment of Ag2O nanoparticles toxicity against Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria. , 2013, The Journal of general and applied microbiology.

[41]  Peter C. Fox,et al.  Statistical variation in progressive scrambling , 2004, J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des..

[42]  Andrew Worth,et al.  Applying quantitative structure-activity relationship approaches to nanotoxicology: current status and future potential. , 2013, Toxicology.

[43]  Hong Chang,et al.  Predicting water quality criteria for protecting aquatic life from physicochemical properties of metals or metalloids. , 2013, Environmental science & technology.

[44]  G. Jiang,et al.  Silver nanoparticle exposure attenuates the viability of rat cerebellum granule cells through apoptosis coupled to oxidative stress. , 2013, Small.

[45]  Peng Wang,et al.  In vitro evaluation of cytotoxicity of engineered metal oxide nanoparticles. , 2009, The Science of the total environment.

[46]  Dominique Lison,et al.  Focusing the research efforts. , 2012, Nature nanotechnology.

[47]  H. Hwang,et al.  Determination of the mechanism of photoinduced toxicity of selected metal oxide nanoparticles (ZnO, CuO, Co3O4 and TiO2) to E. coli bacteria. , 2013, Journal of environmental sciences.

[48]  W. Lu,et al.  Where does the toxicity of metal oxide nanoparticles come from: The nanoparticles, the ions, or a combination of both? , 2016, Journal of hazardous materials.

[49]  Paola Gramatica,et al.  The Importance of Being Earnest: Validation is the Absolute Essential for Successful Application and Interpretation of QSPR Models , 2003 .