Further Insight into the Perception of Quantitative Information: Judgments of Gist in Treatment Decisions

Purpose. To compare relative accuracy and relative response times (RTs) as well as impact of foreground and background colors in a treatment decision context of judging larger/smaller when the following elements are added to the graphics studied previously: 1) a number (the displayed percentage), 2) a referent scale, and 3) a number and a referent scale. Method. An experiment compared pie charts, vertical bars, horizontal bars, digits, systematic ovals, and random ovals. On each trial, participants saw 2 percentages (in 1 format) and were asked to choose the larger chance of survival or the smaller chance of side effects. Outcomes were errors and RT. Formats were either black and white or blue and yellow; background color was either white or blue. Participants were 216 volunteers from the community older than 50 years. Results. Formats with a number produced the same relative errors and relative RT as the formats with a number and scale. Formats with only a scale, however, shifted relative performance: Errors increased with more difficult formats (pie charts and random ovals by 3%-4% v. ∼1% with other formats), but RT decreased with easier formats (vertical bars, horizontal bars, and systematic ovals decreased 100-200 ms v. an increase of 0-300 ms with other formats). Vertical bars with scales were the fastest and most accurately processed. Neither foreground nor background color had any impact on either outcome. Conclusions. For supporting older people’s judgments of relative extent, risk information is best presented using vertical bars with a scale; the format systematic ovals with a scale are among the next most easily processed.

[1]  W A Rushton,et al.  Visual pigments and color blindness. , 1975, Scientific American.

[2]  B Brandt,et al.  Informational needs and selected variables in patients receiving brachytherapy. , 1991, Oncology nursing forum.

[3]  D Feldman-Stewart,et al.  Using a Treatment-tradeoff Method to Elicit Preferences for the Treatment of Locally Advanced Non-Small-cell Lung Cancer , 1998, Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making.

[4]  Sirkka L. Jarvenpaa,et al.  Graphics and managerial decision making: research-based guidelines , 1988, CACM.

[5]  Robert W. Zmud,et al.  The Impact of Color Graphic Report Formats on Decision Performance and Learning , 1983, ICIS.

[6]  S. Wang,et al.  The Effects of Modes of Information Presentation on Decision-Making: A Review and Meta-Analysis , 1989, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[7]  Stephens St.  Patient education materials: are they readable? , 1992 .

[8]  N. Boyd,et al.  Eliciting Preferences for Alternative Cancer Drug Treatments , 1985, Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making.

[9]  Henry C. Lucas,et al.  The Impact of the Mode of Information Presentation on Learning and Performance , 1980 .

[10]  Stephen Wear.  The Informed Consent Event , 1993 .

[11]  William Remus,et al.  An Empirical Investigation of the Impact of Graphical and Tabular Data Presentations on Decision Making , 1984 .

[12]  Gerardine DeSanctis,et al.  Understanding the effectiveness of computer graphics for decision support: a cumulative experimental approach , 1986, CACM.

[13]  Patient education materials: are they readable? , 1992, Oncology nursing forum.

[14]  R McGill,et al.  Graphical Perception and Graphical Methods for Analyzing Scientific Data , 1985, Science.

[15]  Michael Kalloniatis,et al.  The Perception of Color , 2007 .

[16]  Ellen D. Hoadley.  Investigating the effects of color , 1990, Commun. ACM.

[17]  C. Rose,et al.  Information for cancer patients entering a clinical trial--an evaluation of an information strategy. , 1993, European journal of cancer.

[18]  John A. Baron,et al.  The framing effect of relative and absolute risk , 1993, Journal of General Internal Medicine.

[19]  Deb Feldman-Stewart,et al.  What Questions Do Patients with Curable Prostate Cancer Want Answered? , 2000, Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making.

[20]  Bryan Rodgers,et al.  What does a Man do after he Makes an Error? An Analysis of Response Programming , 1977 .

[21]  R. W. Driver,et al.  The Influence of Computer Graphics on the Recall of Information , 1983, MIS Q..

[22]  G. Lockwood,et al.  Are We Getting Informed Consent from Patients with Cancer? , 1990, Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine.

[23]  W. S. Cleveland,et al.  Human factors and behavioral science: Experiments on quantitative judgments of graphs and maps , 1983, The Bell System Technical Journal.

[24]  Ola Svenson,et al.  Patient‐focussed decision‐making in early‐stage prostate cancer: insights from a cognitively based decision aid , 2004, Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy.

[25]  S. Jubelirer,et al.  Reading versus comprehension: implications for patient education and consent in an outpatient oncology clinic. , 1994, Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education.

[26]  J G Hollands,et al.  Judgments of Change and Proportion in Graphical Perception , 1992, Human factors.

[27]  Robert W. Zmud,et al.  AN EMPIRICAL INVESTIGATION OF THE DIMENSIONALITY OF THE CONCEPT OF INFORMATION , 1978 .

[28]  Izak Benbasat,et al.  An experimental program investigating color-enhanced and graphical information presentation: an integration of the findings , 1986, CACM.

[29]  J. Shanteau,et al.  Environmental Stressor Effects on Creativity and Decision Making , 1993 .

[30]  Peter C.-H. Cheng,et al.  Modeling the Effect of Task and Graphical Representation on Response Latency in a Graph Reading Task , 2003, Hum. Factors.

[31]  Joachim Meyer,et al.  Information Structure and the Relative Efficacy of Tables and Graphs , 1999, Hum. Factors.

[32]  D Feldman-Stewart,et al.  The information required by patients with early‐stage prostate cancer in choosing their treatment , 2001, BJU international.

[33]  B. Cimprich.  Age and extent of surgery affect attention in women treated for breast cancer. , 1998, Research in nursing & health.

[34]  D Feldman-Stewart,et al.  Phase I study of a decision aid for patients with locally advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. , 2001, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[35]  C. Meade,et al.  Readability of American Cancer Society patient education literature. , 1992, Oncology nursing forum.

[36]  P Burnard,et al.  The Effectiveness of One-to-one Risk-communication Interventions in Health Care , 2000, Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making.

[37]  Olivier R. Joubert,et al.  How long to get to the “gist” of real-world natural scenes? , 2005 .

[38]  Ben Shneiderman,et al.  An Experimental Comparison of Tabular and Graphic Data Presentation , 1984, Int. J. Man Mach. Stud..

[39]  Thomas S. Tullis,et al.  An Evaluation of Alphanumeric, Graphic, and Color Information Displays , 1981 .

[40]  Sirkka L. Jarvenpaa,et al.  The effect of task demands and graphical format on information processing strategies , 1989 .

[41]  C D Naylor,et al.  Communicating the Benefits of Chronic Preventive Therapy , 1995, Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making.

[42]  Nancy L. Kocovski,et al.  Perception of Quantitative Information for Treatment Decisions , 2000, Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making.

[43]  Robert McGill,et al.  An Experiment in Graphical Perception , 1986, Int. J. Man Mach. Stud..

[44]  Julie A. Jacko,et al.  The effects of multimodal feedback on older adults' task performance given varying levels of computer experience , 2004, Behav. Inf. Technol..

[45]  M. O'rourke,et al.  Narrowing the options: the process of deciding on prostate cancer treatment. , 1999, Cancer investigation.

[46]  B. Marx.  The Visual Display of Quantitative Information , 1985 .

[47]  G. Elwyn,et al.  Presenting risk information--a review of the effects of "framing" and other manipulations on patient outcomes. , 2001, Journal of health communication.

[48]  Daniel G Bobrow,et al.  On data-limited and resource-limited processes , 1975, Cognitive Psychology.