ATTITUDE-CHANGE FOLLOWING PERSUASIVE COMMUNICATION - INTEGRATING SOCIAL JUDGMENT THEORY AND THE ELABORATION LIKELIHOOD MODEL

An experiment was conducted to examine the influence of the perceived extremity of a message and motivation to elaborate upon the process of persuasion. The first goal was to test a model of attitude change relating Social Judgment Theory to the Elaboration Likelihood Model. The second objective was to develop an instrument to measure attitude structure (latitudes of acceptance, non-commitment, and rejection) that allowed for a more refined assessment of the discrepancy between the position advocated in a message and the recipient's initial attitude. The main dependent variable was the attitude towards the use of automobiles in relation to environmental issues. Subjects were confronted with a message located in their own latitude of acceptance, rejection or non-commitment. Shortly after, a second measurement of attitude took place. The results showed that messages within the latitudes of non-commitment gave rise to the greatest attitude change. The data support the susceptibility hypothesis that subjects elaborate messages mainly in the latitude of non-commitment.

[1]  Herbert Hoijtink,et al.  The Measurement of Latent Traits by Proximity Items , 1991 .

[2]  Herbert Hoijtink,et al.  A latent trait model for dichotomous choice data , 1990 .

[3]  D. O’Keefe.  Persuasion , 1990, The Handbook of Communication Skills.

[4]  S. Kaplowitz,et al.  Message discrepancy and the persistence of attitude change: Implications of an information integration model , 1986 .

[5]  O. Wiegman.  Two politicians in a realistic experiment: attraction, discrepancy, intensity of delivery, and attitude change , 1985 .

[6]  E. L. Fink,et al.  Positional discrepancy, psychological discrepancy, and attitude change: Experimental tests of some mathematical models 1 , 1983 .

[7]  Muzafer Sherif,et al.  Attitude and Attitude Change: The Social Judgment-Involvement Approach , 1982 .

[8]  C. I. Hovland,et al.  Social Judgment: Assimilation and Contrast Effects in Communication and Attitude Change , 1981 .

[9]  D. Granberg,et al.  Effect of communication discrepancy and ambiguity on placement and opinion shift , 1977 .

[10]  P. Abrami.  The Effects of Varying Mode of Opinion Statement Presentation on the Latitudes of Acceptance, Rejection, and Uncertainty , 1976 .

[11]  B. Stacey,et al.  A Psychophysical Investigation of the Influence of Attitude on the Judgement of Social Stimuli , 1973 .

[12]  J. O. Whittaker.  ATTITUDE CHANGE AND COMMUNICATION-ATTITUDE DISCREPANCY. , 1965, The Journal of social psychology.

[13]  J. Freedman,et al.  INVOLVEMENT, DISCREPANCY, AND CHANGE. , 1964, Journal of abnormal psychology.