Conspecific Attraction and Shelter Selection in Gregarious Insects

During habitat selection, the presence of conspecifics can frequently drive a nonuniform distribution of animals across habitats of equivalent quality. In group‐living species, subgroups of individuals might display mutual attraction while differing in their preferences for environmental resources. The final decision to settle requires individuals to integrate both environmental and social cues. This raises the question of the relative importance of sociality and resources preferences in determining habitat choice. In this study, we examined the interactive influence of conspecific attraction on individual resource preferences on refuge choice in groups of cockroaches. Shelters scaled to the sizes of nymphs and adult males were offered to groups of only nymphs and only males and to mixed groups. The choices of males were consistent across social conditions. Conversely, the preferences of nymphs shifted depending on the social context; the presence of males overrode the affinity nymphs had for scaled‐size shelters. We developed a numerical model implementing parameters derived from these experiments to test whether the final spatial distribution of individuals originated from a differential attraction between nymphs and males that was associated with their relative body size. Finally, we propose a general framework for understanding how similar mechanisms can promote the skewed distribution of organisms at different spatial scales.

[1]  T. Caraco,et al.  Social Foraging Theory , 2018 .

[2]  R. R. Krausz Living in Groups , 2013 .

[3]  JEAN-LOUIS DENEUBOURG,et al.  Positive Feedback, Convergent Collective Patterns, and Social Transitions in Arthropods , 2009, Organization of Insect Societies.

[4]  J. Tella,et al.  The Role of Despotism and Heritability in Determining Settlement Patterns in the Colonial Lesser Kestrel , 2006, The American Naturalist.

[5]  Robert J Fletcher,et al.  Emergent properties of conspecific attraction in fragmented landscapes. , 2006, The American naturalist.

[6]  M. Donahue Allee effects and conspecific cueing jointly lead to conspecific attraction , 2006, Oecologia.

[7]  José Halloy,et al.  Collegial decision making based on social amplification leads to optimal group formation. , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[8]  V. V. Krishnan,et al.  NONINTUITIVE CUE USE IN HABITAT SELECTION , 2005 .

[9]  Colette Rivault,et al.  Cuticular hydrocarbon profiles and aggregation in four Periplaneta species (Insecta: Dictyoptera). , 2005, Journal of insect physiology.

[10]  Colette Rivault,et al.  Could Species Segregation be a Consequence of Aggregation Processes? Example of Periplaneta americana (L.) and P. fuliginosa (Serville) , 2005 .

[11]  G. W. Gerald,et al.  The influence of chemical cues and conspecific density on the temperature selection of a freshwater snail (Melanoides tuberculata) , 2005 .

[12]  G. Robinson,et al.  Sociogenomics: social life in molecular terms , 2005, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[13]  M. Jangoux,et al.  Larval Morphometrics and Influence of Adults on Settlement in the Gregarious Ophiuroid Ophiothrix fragilis (Echinodermata) , 2005, The Biological Bulletin.

[14]  Sasha R. X. Dall,et al.  Information and its use by animals in evolutionary ecology. , 2005, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[15]  J. Deneubourg,et al.  Self-organized aggregation in cockroaches , 2005, Animal Behaviour.

[16]  J. Donázar,et al.  DISPERSAL AND SOCIAL ATTRACTION AFFECT COLONY SELECTION AND DYNAMICS OF LESSER KESTRELS , 2004 .

[17]  J. Deneubourg,et al.  Cockroach aggregation based on strain odour recognition , 2004, Animal Behaviour.

[18]  J. Deneubourg,et al.  The influence of red light on the aggregation of two castes of the ant, Lasius niger. , 2004, Journal of insect physiology.

[19]  M. Jangoux,et al.  Juvenile–adult relationship in the gregarious ophiuroid Ophiothrix fragilis (Echinodermata): a behavioral and morphological study , 2004 .

[20]  C. Patrick Doncaster,et al.  Population consequences of mutual attraction between settling and adult barnacles , 2003 .

[21]  B. Doligez,et al.  When to use public information for breeding habitat selection? The role of environmental predictability and density dependence , 2003, Animal Behaviour.

[22]  W L Pak,et al.  cGMP-dependent changes in phototaxis: a possible role for the foraging gene in honey bee division of labor , 2003, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[23]  D. Gordon,et al.  Social insects: Cuticular hydrocarbons inform task decisions , 2003, Nature.

[24]  Wladimir J Alonso,et al.  Deciding where to settle: conspecific attraction and web site selection in the orb-web spider Nephilengys cruentata , 2001, Animal Behaviour.

[25]  W. Herrnkind,et al.  The guide effect influence on the gregariousness of juvenile Caribbean spiny lobsters , 2001, Animal Behaviour.

[26]  V. Sevala,et al.  An adaptive benefit of facultative coprophagy in the German cockroach Blattella germanica , 2001 .

[27]  C. Schal,et al.  Role of feeding in the reproductive 'group effect' in females of the German cockroach Blattella germanica (L.). , 2000, Journal of insect physiology.

[28]  V. Quinn,et al.  Space Use in Response to Conspecifics by the Red-backed Salamander (Plethodon cinereus, Plethodontidae, Caudata) , 1999 .

[29]  M. Dambach,et al.  Aggregation density and longevity correlate with humidity in first-instar nymphs of the cockroach (Blattella germanica L., Dictyoptera). , 1999, Journal of insect physiology.

[30]  W. Tschinkel,et al.  Sociometry and sociogenesis of colonies of the harvester ant, Pogonomyrmex badius: distribution of workers, brood and seeds within the nest in relation to colony size and season , 1999 .

[31]  C Rivault,et al.  Cuticular extracts inducing aggregation in the German cockroach, Blattella germanica (L.). , 1998, Journal of insect physiology.

[32]  D. Eggleston,et al.  Size- and scale-dependent chemical attraction contribute to an ontogenetic shift in sociality , 1998, Animal Behaviour.

[33]  M. Massot,et al.  CONSPECIFIC REPRODUCTIVE SUCCESS AND BREEDING HABITAT SELECTION: IMPLICATIONS FOR THE STUDY OF COLONIALITY , 1998 .

[34]  K. L. Muller The role of conspecifics in habitat settlement in a territorial grasshopper , 1998, Animal Behaviour.

[35]  C. Schal,et al.  Social influences on nymphal development in the cockroach, Diploptera punctata , 1998 .

[36]  C. Rivault,et al.  Cockroach aggregation: discrimination between strain odours in Blattella germanica , 1998, Animal Behaviour.

[37]  V. V. Krishnan,et al.  The Effects of Conspecific Attraction and Habitat Quality on Habitat Selection in Territorial Birds (Troglodytes Aedon) , 1997, The American Naturalist.

[38]  L. Giraldeau,et al.  Influence of Conspecific Attraction on the Spatial Distribution of Learning Foragers in a Patchy Habitat. , 1997 .

[39]  T. E. Minchinton Life on the edge: conspecific attraction and recruitment of populations to disturbed habitats , 1997, Oecologia.

[40]  J. Yoder,et al.  Group influence on water conservation in the giant Madagascar hissing‐cockroach, Gromphadorhina portentosa (Dictyoptera: Blaberidae) , 1997 .

[41]  P. Grosjean,et al.  Experimental study of growth in the echinoid Paracentrotus lividus (Lamarck, 1816) (Echinodermata) , 1996 .

[42]  C. Scott,et al.  Dietary Habits and Social Interactions Affect Choice of Feeding Location by Sheep , 1995 .

[43]  Romuald N. Lipcius,et al.  Shelter Selection by Spiny Lobster Under Variable Predation Risk, Social Conditions, and Shelter Size , 1992 .

[44]  D. Booth Larval settlement patterns and preferences by domino damselfish Dascyllus albisella Gill , 1992 .

[45]  R. K. Zimmer-Faust,et al.  Some physical properties of shelter that influence den preference in spiny lobsters , 1988 .

[46]  J. Stamps Conspecific Attraction and Aggregation in Territorial Species , 1988, The American Naturalist.

[47]  W. Burkholder,et al.  Quinone-aggregation pheromone interaction in the red flour beetle , 1987, Animal Behaviour.

[48]  P. Breen,et al.  Social behaviour of juvenile red sea urchins, Strongylocentrotus franciscanus (Agassiz) , 1985 .

[49]  H. Sweatman The influence of adults of some coral reef fishes on larval recruitment , 1985 .

[50]  T. Seeley,et al.  Nest site selection by the honey bee,Apis mellifera , 1978, Insectes Sociaux.

[51]  R. Ceusters Social homeostasis in colonies of Formica polyctena Foerst. (Hymenoptera, Formicidae): nestform and temperature preferences , 1977 .

[52]  M. Tegner,et al.  Sea urchin recruitment patterns and implications of commercial fishing. , 1977, Science.

[53]  S. Fretwell,et al.  On territorial behavior and other factors influencing habitat distribution in birds , 1969 .

[54]  S. Fretwell,et al.  On territorial behavior and other factors influencing habitat distribution in birds , 1969 .

[55]  D. Wharton,et al.  Population density, survival, growth, and development of the American cockroach. , 1967, Journal of insect physiology.

[56]  J. Korb,et al.  International Union for the Study of Social Insects , 2008, Insectes Sociaux.

[57]  J. Stamps,et al.  The effect of conspecifics on habitat selection in territorial species , 2004, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[58]  B. Roitberg,et al.  Joining and avoidance behavior in nonsocial insects. , 2001, Annual review of entomology.

[59]  A. Ugolini,et al.  MOTHER-YOUNG RELATIONSHIP IN EUSCORPIUS: ADAPTIVE VALUE OF THE LARVAL PERMANENCE ON THE MOTHER'S BACK (SCORPIONES, CHACTIDAE) , 1986 .