Carbon residence time dominates uncertainty in terrestrial vegetation responses to future climate and atmospheric CO2

Future climate change and increasing atmospheric CO2 are expected to cause major changes in vegetation structure and function over large fractions of the global land surface. Seven global vegetation models are used to analyze possible responses to future climate simulated by a range of general circulation models run under all four representative concentration pathway scenarios of changing concentrations of greenhouse gases. All 110 simulations predict an increase in global vegetation carbon to 2100, but with substantial variation between vegetation models. For example, at 4 °C of global land surface warming (510–758 ppm of CO2), vegetation carbon increases by 52–477 Pg C (224 Pg C mean), mainly due to CO2 fertilization of photosynthesis. Simulations agree on large regional increases across much of the boreal forest, western Amazonia, central Africa, western China, and southeast Asia, with reductions across southwestern North America, central South America, southern Mediterranean areas, southwestern Africa, and southwestern Australia. Four vegetation models display discontinuities across 4 °C of warming, indicating global thresholds in the balance of positive and negative influences on productivity and biomass. In contrast to previous global vegetation model studies, we emphasize the importance of uncertainties in projected changes in carbon residence times. We find, when all seven models are considered for one representative concentration pathway × general circulation model combination, such uncertainties explain 30% more variation in modeled vegetation carbon change than responses of net primary productivity alone, increasing to 151% for non-HYBRID4 models. A change in research priorities away from production and toward structural dynamics and demographic processes is recommended.

[1]  F. Piontek,et al.  The Inter-Sectoral Impact Model Intercomparison Project (ISI–MIP): Project framework , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[2]  F. Piontek,et al.  A trend-preserving bias correction – the ISI-MIP approach , 2013 .

[3]  Wolfgang Lucht,et al.  Contribution of permafrost soils to the global carbon budget , 2013 .

[4]  O. Phillips,et al.  Residence times of woody biomass in tropical forests , 2013 .

[5]  Volker Wulfmeyer,et al.  HESS Opinions "Should we apply bias correction to global and regional climate model data?" , 2012 .

[6]  Karl E. Taylor,et al.  An overview of CMIP5 and the experiment design , 2012 .

[7]  P. Cox,et al.  The Joint UK Land Environment Simulator (JULES), model description – Part 2: Carbon fluxes and vegetation dynamics , 2011 .

[8]  R. B. Jackson,et al.  A Large and Persistent Carbon Sink in the World’s Forests , 2011, Science.

[9]  Interactive comment on “Evaluation of a Dynamic Global Vegetation Model using time series of satellite vegetation indices” by F. Maignan et al , 2011 .

[10]  D. Coomes,et al.  Influences of Forest Structure, Climate and Species Composition on Tree Mortality across the Eastern US , 2010, PloS one.

[11]  Stephen Sitch,et al.  Multiple mechanisms of Amazonian forest biomass losses in three dynamic global vegetation models under climate change. , 2010, The New phytologist.

[12]  Shohei Murayama,et al.  Greenhouse Gas Budget of a Cool-Temperate Deciduous Broad-Leaved Forest in Japan Estimated Using a Process-Based Model , 2010, Ecosystems.

[13]  N. McDowell,et al.  A global overview of drought and heat-induced tree mortality reveals emerging climate change risks for forests , 2010 .

[14]  Peter E. Thornton,et al.  Systematic assessment of terrestrial biogeochemistry in coupled climate–carbon models , 2009 .

[15]  Darren T. Drewry,et al.  The Jena Diversity-Dynamic Global Vegetation Model (JeDi-DGVM): a diverse approach to representing t , 2012 .

[16]  I. C. Prentice,et al.  Evaluation of the terrestrial carbon cycle, future plant geography and climate‐carbon cycle feedbacks using five Dynamic Global Vegetation Models (DGVMs) , 2008 .

[17]  S. Pacala,et al.  Predictive Models of Forest Dynamics , 2008, Science.

[18]  R. Schnur,et al.  Climate-carbon cycle feedback analysis: Results from the C , 2006 .

[19]  I. C. Prentice,et al.  A dynamic global vegetation model for studies of the coupled atmosphere‐biosphere system , 2005 .

[20]  F. Woodward,et al.  Vegetation dynamics – simulating responses to climatic change , 2004, Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society.

[21]  W. Parton,et al.  Progressive Nitrogen Limitation of Ecosystem Responses to Rising Atmospheric Carbon Dioxide , 2004 .

[22]  Christopher B. Field,et al.  Nitrogen and Climate Change , 2003, Science.

[23]  I. C. Prentice,et al.  Evaluation of ecosystem dynamics, plant geography and terrestrial carbon cycling in the LPJ dynamic global vegetation model , 2003 .

[24]  Akihiko Ito,et al.  A simulation model of the carbon cycle in land ecosystems (Sim-CYCLE) : A description based on dry-matter production theory and plot-scale validation , 2002 .

[25]  F. Woodward,et al.  Global response of terrestrial ecosystem structure and function to CO2 and climate change: results from six dynamic global vegetation models , 2001 .

[26]  Andrew White,et al.  Evaluation and analysis of a dynamic terrestrial ecosystem model under preindustrial conditions at the global scale , 2000 .