Validation of new Gibbs priors for Bayesian tomographic reconstruction using numerical studies and physically acquired data

The variety of Bayesian MAP approaches to emission tomography proposed in recent years can both stabilize reconstructions and lead to improved bias and variance. In the authors' previous work (S.J. Lee et al., IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging, vol. MI-14, no. 4, p. 669-80, 1995; S.J. Lee et al., IEEE Trans. Nuclear Science, vol. NS-44, no. 3, p. 1381-7, 1997), the authors showed that the thin-plate (TP) prior, which is less sensitive to variations in first spatial derivatives than the conventional membrane (MM) prior, yields improved reconstructions in the sense of low bias. In spite of the several advantages of such quadratic smoothing priors, they are still less than ideal due to their limitations in edge preservation. Here, the authors use a convex but nonquadratic (CNQ) potential function, which provides a degree of edge preservation. As in the case of quadratic priors, a class of two-dimensional smoothing splines with first and second partial derivatives are applied to the new potential function. In order to reduce difficulties such as oversmoothing for MM and edge overshooting for TP, the authors also generalize the prior energy definition to that of a linear combination of MM and TP using a control parameter, and observe its transition between the two extreme cases. To validate advantages of their new priors, the authors first perform extensive numerical studies using a digital phantom to compare the bias/variance behavior of CNQ priors with that of quadratic priors. They also use physically acquired PET emission and transmission data from phantoms to observe the efficacies of their new priors. The authors' numerical studies and results using physical phantoms show that a combination of first and second partial derivatives applied to the CNQ potential yields improved quantitative results in terms of scalar metrics of image quality computed from independent noise trials and good qualitative results for both emission and transmission images.

[1]  C. Bohm,et al.  Correction for Scattered Radiation in a Ring Detector Positron Camera by Integral Transformation of the Projections , 1983, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[2]  Anand Rangarajan,et al.  Bayesian image reconstruction in SPECT using higher order mechanical models as priors , 1995, IEEE Trans. Medical Imaging.

[3]  G. Gindi,et al.  Noise analysis of MAP-EM algorithms for emission tomography. , 1997, Physics in medicine and biology.

[4]  T. Hebert,et al.  A generalized EM algorithm for 3-D Bayesian reconstruction from Poisson data using Gibbs priors. , 1989, IEEE transactions on medical imaging.

[5]  Ken D. Sauer,et al.  A generalized Gaussian image model for edge-preserving MAP estimation , 1993, IEEE Trans. Image Process..

[6]  Anand Rangarajan,et al.  Autoradiographic-based phantoms for emission tomography , 1997, Medical Imaging.

[7]  Andrew Blake,et al.  Visual Reconstruction , 1987, Deep Learning for EEG-Based Brain–Computer Interfaces.

[8]  Ken D. Sauer,et al.  ML parameter estimation for Markov random fields with applications to Bayesian tomography , 1998, IEEE Trans. Image Process..

[9]  E.E. Pissaloux,et al.  Image Processing , 1994, Proceedings. Second Euromicro Workshop on Parallel and Distributed Processing.

[10]  Donald Geman,et al.  Constrained Restoration and the Recovery of Discontinuities , 1992, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[11]  Simon R. Cherry,et al.  Fast gradient-based methods for Bayesian reconstruction of transmission and emission PET images , 1994, IEEE Trans. Medical Imaging.

[12]  Gene Gindi,et al.  The thin plate as a regularizer in Bayesian SPECT reconstruction , 1996, 1996 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium. Conference Record.

[13]  Stan Z. Li,et al.  Close-Form Solution and Parameter Selection for Convex Minimization-Based Edge-Preserving Smoothing , 1998, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[14]  Anil K. Jain,et al.  /spl lambda//spl tau/-space representation of images and generalized edge detector , 1996, Proceedings CVPR IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.

[15]  Zhenyu Zhou,et al.  Approximate maximum likelihood hyperparameter estimation for Gibbs priors , 1995, Proceedings., International Conference on Image Processing.

[16]  Chin-Tu Chen,et al.  Image Restoration Using Gibbs Priors: Boundary Modeling, Treatment of Blurring, and Selection of Hyperparameter , 1991, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[17]  P. Green Bayesian reconstructions from emission tomography data using a modified EM algorithm. , 1990, IEEE transactions on medical imaging.

[18]  Jeffrey A. Fessler,et al.  Grouped-coordinate ascent algorithms for penalized-likelihood transmission image reconstruction , 1997, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[19]  Anil K. Jain,et al.  lamda-tau-Space Representation of Images and Generalized Edge Detector , 1997, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[20]  K. Lange,et al.  EM reconstruction algorithms for emission and transmission tomography. , 1984, Journal of computer assisted tomography.