Assessment of the Efficacy of ReoGo-J Robotic Training Against Other Rehabilitation Therapies for Upper-Limb Hemiplegia After Stroke: Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial

Background: Stroke patients experience chronic hemiparesis in their upper extremities leaving negative effects on quality of life. Robotic therapy is one method to recover arm function, but its research is still in its infancy. Research questions of this study is to investigate how to maximize the benefit of robotic therapy using ReoGo-J for arm hemiplegia in chronic stroke patients. Methods: Design of this study is a multi-center parallel group trial following the prospective, randomized, open-label, blinded endpoint (PROBE) study model. Participants and setting will be 120 chronic stroke patients (over 6 months post-stroke) will be randomly allocated to three different rehabilitation protocols. In this study, the control group will receive 20 min of standard rehabilitation (conventional occupational therapy) and 40 min of self-training (i.e., sanding, placing and stretching). The robotic therapy group will receive 20 min of standard rehabilitation and 40 min of robotic therapy using ReoGo®-J device. The combined therapy group will receive 40 min of robotic therapy and 20 min of constraint-induced movement therapy (protocol to improve upper-limb use in ADL suggests). This study employs the Fugl-Meyer Assessment upper-limb score (primary outcome), other arm function measures and the Stroke Impact Scale score will be measured at baseline, 5 and 10 weeks of the treatment phase. In analysis of this study, we use the mixed effects model for repeated measures to compare changes in outcomes between groups at 5 and 10 Weeks. The registration number of this study is UMIN000022509. Conclusions: This study is a feasible, multi-site randomized controlled trial to examine our hypothesis that combined training protocol could maximize the benefit of robotic therapy and best effective therapeutic strategy for patients with upper-limb hemiparesis.

[1]  K. Domen,et al.  A 6-month follow-up after constraint-induced movement therapy with and without transfer package for patients with hemiparesis after stroke: a pilot quasi-randomized controlled trial , 2013, Clinical rehabilitation.

[2]  Ryanne J. M. Lemmens,et al.  Effects of task-oriented robot training on arm function, activity, and quality of life in chronic stroke patients: a randomized controlled trial , 2014, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

[3]  Lynne V. Gauthier,et al.  Remodeling the Brain: Plastic Structural Brain Changes Produced by Different Motor Therapies After Stroke , 2008, Stroke.

[4]  Subashan Perera,et al.  Rasch analysis of a new stroke-specific outcome scale: the Stroke Impact Scale. , 2003, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[5]  A. Fugl-Meyer,et al.  The post-stroke hemiplegic patient. 1. a method for evaluation of physical performance. , 1975, Scandinavian journal of rehabilitation medicine.

[6]  T. Hedner,et al.  Prospective randomized open blinded end-point (PROBE) study. A novel design for intervention trials. Prospective Randomized Open Blinded End-Point. , 1992, Blood pressure.

[7]  L. Jongbloed.  Prediction of function after stroke: a critical review. , 1986, Stroke.

[8]  Hsiu-Fen Lin,et al.  Timing of stroke onset determines discharge‐functional status but not stroke severity: A hospital‐based study , 2013, The Kaohsiung journal of medical sciences.

[9]  T. Platz,et al.  Electromechanical and robot-assisted arm training for improving arm function and activities of daily living after stroke. , 2008, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[10]  D. Wade,et al.  Loss of arm function after stroke: measurement, frequency, and recovery. , 1986, International rehabilitation medicine.

[11]  C. N. Coleman,et al.  CTCAE v3.0: development of a comprehensive grading system for the adverse effects of cancer treatment. , 2003, Seminars in radiation oncology.

[12]  Y. Hsieh,et al.  Determinants of change in stroke-specific quality of life after distributed constraint-induced therapy. , 2013, The American journal of occupational therapy : official publication of the American Occupational Therapy Association.

[13]  E. Taub,et al.  Constraint-induced movement therapy: characterizing the intervention protocol. , 2006, Europa medicophysica.

[14]  Grant D. Huang,et al.  Robot-assisted therapy for long-term upper-limb impairment after stroke. , 2010, The New England journal of medicine.

[15]  Munir S. Alam,et al.  Factors Influencing the , 2016 .

[16]  Maarten J. IJzerman,et al.  Systematic review of the effect of robot-aided therapy on recovery of the hemiparetic arm after stroke. , 2006, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[17]  P. Langhorne,et al.  Stroke rehabilitation , 2011, The Lancet.

[18]  J. H. van der Lee,et al.  Forced use of the upper extremity in chronic stroke patients: results from a single-blind randomized clinical trial. , 1999, Stroke.

[19]  Peter Levine,et al.  Stroke patients' and therapists' opinions of constraint-induced movement therapy , 2002, Clinical rehabilitation.

[20]  G. Demeurisse,et al.  [Motor evaluation in vascular hemiplegia]. , 1979, Bruxelles medical.

[21]  C. Aring,et al.  A CRITICAL REVIEW , 1939, Journal of neurology and psychiatry.

[22]  M. Franceschini,et al.  Robot therapy for functional recovery of the upper limbs: a pilot study on patients after stroke. , 2009, Journal of rehabilitation medicine.

[23]  Victor W. Mark,et al.  Method for Enhancing Real-World Use of a More Affected Arm in Chronic Stroke: Transfer Package of Constraint-Induced Movement Therapy , 2013, Stroke.

[24]  Sarah J. Housman,et al.  A Randomized Controlled Trial of Gravity-Supported, Computer-Enhanced Arm Exercise for Individuals With Severe Hemiparesis , 2009, Neurorehabilitation and neural repair.

[25]  K. Domen,et al.  Therapeutic Synergism in the Treatment of Post‐stroke Arm Paresis Utilizing Botulinum Toxin, Robotic Therapy, and Constraint‐induced Movement Therapy , 2014, PM & R : the journal of injury, function, and rehabilitation.

[26]  H. Mckellop,et al.  Functional range of motion of the joints of the hand. , 1990, The Journal of hand surgery.

[27]  Ryanne J. M. Lemmens,et al.  Accelerometry Measuring the Outcome of Robot-Supported Upper Limb Training in Chronic Stroke: A Randomized Controlled Trial , 2014, PloS one.

[28]  Stacy L Fritz,et al.  Active Finger Extension Predicts Outcomes After Constraint-Induced Movement Therapy for Individuals With Hemiparesis After Stroke , 2005, Stroke.

[29]  H. Bussche,et al.  Home-based constraint-induced movement therapy for patients with upper limb dysfunction after stroke (HOMECIMT): a cluster-randomised, controlled trial , 2015, The Lancet Neurology.

[30]  S. Page,et al.  Clinically Important Differences for the Upper-Extremity Fugl-Meyer Scale in People With Minimal to Moderate Impairment Due to Chronic Stroke , 2012, Physical Therapy.

[31]  J. H. van der Lee,et al.  The intra- and interrater reliability of the action research arm test: a practical test of upper extremity function in patients with stroke. , 2001, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[32]  Richard W. Bohannon,et al.  Interrater reliability of a modified Ashworth scale of muscle spasticity. , 1987, Physical therapy.

[33]  H. Krebs,et al.  Effects of Robot-Assisted Therapy on Upper Limb Recovery After Stroke: A Systematic Review , 2008, Neurorehabilitation and neural repair.

[34]  J. Eng,et al.  Guidelines for Adult Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery: A Guideline for Healthcare Professionals From the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association , 2016, Stroke.

[35]  R. Lyle.  A performance test for assessment of upper limb function in physical rehabilitation treatment and research , 1981, International journal of rehabilitation research. Internationale Zeitschrift fur Rehabilitationsforschung. Revue internationale de recherches de readaptation.

[36]  A. Sanabria,et al.  Randomized controlled trial. , 2005, World journal of surgery.

[37]  Versione,et al.  Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events , 2020, Definitions.

[38]  E. Taub,et al.  Reliability and Validity of the Upper-Extremity Motor Activity Log-14 for Measuring Real-World Arm Use , 2005, Stroke.

[39]  G. Yao,et al.  Dose–Response Relationship of Robot-Assisted Stroke Motor Rehabilitation: The Impact of Initial Motor Status , 2012, Stroke.

[40]  P. Clark,et al.  Factors Influencing Stroke Survivors' Quality of Life During Subacute Recovery , 2005, Stroke.

[41]  Alexander W Dromerick,et al.  Estimating minimal clinically important differences of upper-extremity measures early after stroke. , 2008, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[42]  Stacy L Fritz,et al.  Descriptive characteristics as potential predictors of outcomes following constraint-induced movement therapy for people after stroke. , 2006, Physical therapy.

[43]  E. Taub,et al.  A Placebo-Controlled Trial of Constraint-Induced Movement Therapy for Upper Extremity After Stroke , 2006, Stroke.

[44]  E. Mohammadi,et al.  Barriers and facilitators related to the implementation of a physiological track and trigger system: A systematic review of the qualitative evidence , 2017, International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care.

[45]  W. Rymer,et al.  Robot-assisted reaching exercise promotes arm movement recovery in chronic hemiparetic stroke: a randomized controlled pilot study , 2006, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

[46]  S. Folstein,et al.  "Mini-mental state". A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. , 1975, Journal of psychiatric research.

[47]  K. Domen,et al.  Efficacy of Upper Extremity Robotic Therapy in Subacute Poststroke Hemiplegia: An Exploratory Randomized Trial , 2016, Stroke.