Comparison of gas chromatography/mass spectrometry and immunoassay techniques on concentrations of atrazine in storm runoff

Gas chromatography/mass spectrometry (GC/MS) and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) techniques were used to measure concentrations of dissolved atrazine in 149 surface-water samples. Samples were collected during May 1992–September 1993 near the mouth of the White River (Indiana) and in two small tributaries of the river. GC/MS was performed on a Hewlett-Packard 5971 AUse of brand names is for identification purposes only and does not constitute endorsement by the U.S. Geological Survey, the Uniroyal Chemical Company, or Wichita State University. with electron impact ionization and selected ion monitoring of filtered water samples extracted by C-18 solid phase extraction; ELISA was performed with a magnetic-particle-based assay with photometric analysis. ELISA results compared reasonably well to GC/MS measurements at concentrations below the Maximum Contaminant Level for drinking water set by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (3.0 μg/L), but a systematic negative bias was observed at higher concentrations. When higher concentration samples were diluted into the linear range of calibration, the relation improved. A slight positive bias was seen in all of the ELISA data compared to the GC/MS results, and the bias could be partially explained by correcting the ELISA data for cross reactivity with other triazine herbicides. The highest concentrations of atrazine were found during the first major runoff event after the atrazine was applied. Concentrations decreased throughout the rest of the sampling period even though large runoff events occurred during this time, indicating that most atrazine loading to surface waters in the study area occurs within a few weeks after application.

[1]  F. James Rohlf,et al.  Biometry: The Principles and Practice of Statistics in Biological Research , 1969 .

[2]  R. Sokal,et al.  Biometry: The Principles and Practice of Statistics in Biological Research (2nd ed.). , 1982 .

[3]  S. J. Huber Improved solid-phase enzyme immunoassay systems in the ppt range for atrazin in fresh water , 1985 .

[4]  R. Eisler Atrazine Hazards to Fish, Wildlife, and Invertebrates: A Synoptic Review , 1989 .

[5]  C. Rostad,et al.  Occurrence, distributions, and transport of herbicides and their degradation products in the Lower Mississippi River and its tributaries , 1990 .

[6]  E. Thurman,et al.  Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay compared with gas chromatography/mass spectrometry for the determination of triazine herbicides in water. , 1990, Analytical chemistry.

[7]  L. Gianessi,et al.  Herbicide use in the United States , 1991 .

[8]  F. Rubio,et al.  Performance characteristics of a novel magnetic‐particlebased enzyme‐linked immunosorbent assay for the quantitative analysis of atrazine and related triazines in water samples , 1991 .

[9]  Michael P. Schroeder,et al.  METHODS OF ANALYSIS BY THE U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY NATIONAL WATER QUALITY LABORATORY- DETERMINATION OF ORGANONITROGEN HERBICIDES IN WATER BY SOLID-PHASE EXTRACTION AND CAPILLARY-COLUMN GAS CHROMATOGRAPHY/MASS * SPECTROMETRY WITH SELECTED-ION MONITORING , 1992 .

[10]  E. Thurman,et al.  A reconnaissance study of herbicides and their metabolites in surface water of the midwestern united states using immunoassay and gas chromatography/mass spectrometry , 1992 .

[11]  J. Moody,et al.  Spatial variability of triazine herbicides in the lower Mississippi River , 1993 .

[12]  L. R. Shelton FIELD GUIDE FOR COLLECTING AND PROCESSING STREAM-WATER SAMPLES FOR THE NATIONAL WATER-QUALITY ASSESSMENT PROGRAM , 1994 .

[13]  M. Lydy,et al.  Water-quality assessment of the White River Basin, Indiana : analysis of available information on pesticides, 1972-92 , 1995 .

[14]  T. K. Edwards,et al.  Field methods for measurement of fluvial sediment , 1998 .