The Effects of Geometrical Parameters of the Pedicle Screw on Its Pullout Strength: In-Vitro Animal Tests

Background: Pedicle screw instrumentation is one of the most commonly used forms of stabilization. Achieving solid screw fixation within the bone presents a significant challenge to spinal surgeons. Although pure pullout is not the mode of failure seen in clinical situations, pullout testing is thought to be a good predictor of pedicle screw fixation strength for spinal fusion.Objectives: To investigate the effects of varying lengths and thread depths of pedicle screws, as well as its insertion angle relative to the sagittal line on pullout strength, and stiffness of the pedicle screws and adjacent bone.Methods: Six fresh-frozen bovine lumbar vertebrae (L5) were examined. Pedicle screws with the lengths of 35, 40, and 45 mm, and the pedicle screws with thread depths of 0.9, 1.1, and 1.15 mm were inserted in pedicles by an orthopedic surgeon. Axial pullout tests were performed by a pullout apparatus and force-displacement curves were plotted.Results: The 45 mm length screw showed the maximum pullout strength (1746 N) and stiffness (564.7 N/mm) in the case of constant thread depth of 0.9 mm. The 1.15 mm thread depth screw showed the maximum pullout strength (1719 N) and stiffness (646.4 N/mm) in the case of constant length of 40 mm, and the screw insertion angle of 25° resulted in maximum pullout strength (1251 N) and stiffness (249.6 N/mm) in the case of constant thread depth of 0.9 mm and constant length of 35 mm.Conclusions: Increasing the length and the thread depth of the screws leads to an increase in the pullout strength, as well as the bone-screw construct stiffness. Pedicle screw pullout strength and the bone-screw construct stiffness were also affected by the insertion angle of the screw. There are other factors such as the insertion technique employed by the surgeon, and bone mineral density, which affect the pullout strength.

[1]  Yu-Tang Shih,et al.  Effect of pedicle screw diameter on screw fixation efficacy in human osteoporotic thoracic vertebrae. , 2017, Journal of biomechanics.

[2]  G. Kumar,et al.  A finite element analysis based sensitivity studies on pull out strength of pedicle screw in synthetic osteoporotic bone models , 2016, 2016 IEEE EMBS Conference on Biomedical Engineering and Sciences (IECBES).

[3]  G. Rouhi,et al.  A PARAMETRIC INVESTIGATION OF THE EFFECTS OF CERVICAL DISC PROSTHESES WITH UPWARD AND DOWNWARD NUCLEI ON SPINE BIOMECHANICS , 2016 .

[4]  F. Amirouche,et al.  Stability and Spine Pedicle Screws Fixation Strength—A Comparative Study of Bone Density and Insertion Angle , 2016, Spine deformity.

[5]  G. Kumar,et al.  Comparative Analysis of Effect of Density, Insertion Angle and Reinsertion on Pull-Out Strength of Single and Two Pedicle Screw Constructs Using Synthetic Bone Model , 2016, Asian spine journal.

[6]  K. Chiba,et al.  Biomechanical evaluation of fixation strength among different sizes of pedicle screws using the cortical bone trajectory: what is the ideal screw size for optimal fixation? , 2016, Acta Neurochirurgica.

[7]  Jianru Wang,et al.  Comparison of pullout strength of the thoracic pedicle screw between intrapedicular and extrapedicular technique: a meta-analysis and literature review. , 2015, International journal of clinical and experimental medicine.

[8]  W. Herzog,et al.  Prediction of Stress Shielding Around Orthopedic Screws: Time-Dependent Bone Remodeling Analysis Using Finite Element Approach , 2015 .

[9]  Mahmoud Mosavi Mashhadi,et al.  BIOMECHANICS OF CERVICAL SPINE FOLLOWING IMPLANTATION OF A SEMI-CONSTRAINED ARTIFICIAL DISC WITH UPWARD CENTER OF ROTATION: A FINITE ELEMENT INVESTIGATION , 2015 .

[10]  G. Kumar,et al.  Pull out strength of pedicle screw in normal and osteoporotic cancellous bone models , 2014, 2014 IEEE Conference on Biomedical Engineering and Sciences (IECBES).

[11]  F. Pfeiffer,et al.  Surgical Strategies to Improve Fixation in the Osteoporotic Spine: The Effects of Tapping, Cement Augmentation, and Screw Trajectory , 2013, Global spine journal.

[12]  Kristina Haase,et al.  Prediction of stress shielding around an orthopedic screw: Using stress and strain energy density as mechanical stimuli , 2013, Comput. Biol. Medicine.

[13]  D. Nuckley,et al.  Biomechanical analysis of pedicle screw thread differential design in an osteoporotic cadaver model. , 2012, Clinical biomechanics.

[14]  Young-Yul Kim,et al.  Assessment of pedicle screw pullout strength based on various screw designs and bone densities-an ex vivo biomechanical study. , 2012, The spine journal : official journal of the North American Spine Society.

[15]  Cleudmar Amaral de Araújo,et al.  Biomechanical Study of the Pullout Resistance in Screws of a Vertebral Fixation System , 2011 .

[16]  D. Hukins,et al.  The effect of screw insertion angle and thread type on the pullout strength of bone screws in normal and osteoporotic cancellous bone models. , 2010, Medical engineering & physics.

[17]  Stavros K Kourkoulis,et al.  A parametric study of cylindrical pedicle screw design implications on the pullout performance using an experimentally validated finite-element model. , 2010, Medical engineering & physics.

[18]  T. Lu,et al.  Comparison and prediction of pullout strength of conical and cylindrical pedicle screws within synthetic bone , 2009, BMC musculoskeletal disorders.

[19]  Ching-Kong Chao,et al.  Increasing Bending Strength and Pullout Strength in Conical Pedicle Screws: Biomechanical Tests and Finite Element Analyses , 2008, Journal of spinal disorders & techniques.

[20]  David P Fyhrie,et al.  Biomechanical analysis of differing pedicle screw insertion angles. , 2007, Clinical biomechanics.

[21]  S. Kourkoulis,et al.  Investigation of the Behaviour of the Pedicle Screw-Vertebral Bone Complex , When Subjected to Pure Pull-Out Loads , 2006 .

[22]  C. Chao,et al.  Increase of pullout strength of spinal pedicle screws with conical core: Biomechanical tests and finite element analyses , 2005, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[23]  E Schneider,et al.  Effect of cortical thickness and cancellous bone density on the holding strength of internal fixator screws , 2004, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[24]  S. Chou,et al.  Investigation of fixation screw pull-out strength on human spine. , 2004, Journal of biomechanics.

[25]  A. Valdevit,et al.  Characteristics of pullout failure in conical and cylindrical pedicle screws after full insertion and back-out. , 2001, The spine journal : official journal of the North American Spine Society.

[26]  E. Schneider,et al.  Comparison of the in vitro holding strengths of conical and cylindrical pedicle screws in a fully inserted setting and backed out 180 degrees. , 2000, Journal of spinal disorders.

[27]  S. Cook,et al.  Biomechanical evaluation and preliminary clinical experience with an expansive pedicle screw design. , 2000, Journal of spinal disorders.

[28]  W. Hutton,et al.  Biomechanical study of lumbar pedicle screws: does convergence affect axial pullout strength? , 1998, Journal of spinal disorders.

[29]  R M Harrington,et al.  Factors affecting the pullout strength of cancellous bone screws. , 1996, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[30]  S. Cook,et al.  Effects of Bone Mineral Density on Pedicle Screw Fixation , 1994, Spine.

[31]  J. Jensen,et al.  Effects of polymerization heat and monomers from acrylic cement on canine bone. , 1994, Acta orthopaedica Scandinavica.

[32]  P. McAfee,et al.  Influence of Bone Mineral Density on the Fixation of Thoracolumbar Implants A Comparative Study of Transpedicular Screws, Laminar Hooks, and Spinous Process Wires , 1990, Spine.

[33]  B. T. Field,et al.  A biomechanical study of intrapeduncular screw fixation in the lumbosacral spine. , 1986, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.