Elia Zureik and Karen Hindle examine governance in relation to information technology and in particular its application to the body. Biometrics, a technology which claims to authenticate and verify personal identity on the basis of behavioural and physiological features, focuses on the body as a unique identifier of individuals. Therefore, while information technology is often proclaimed as facilitating information-sharing, networking, and transparency, Zureik and Hindle point out that biometrics may allow for increased central control and will likely exacerbate social divisions instead of increasing consensus. The perceived need for increased "security" has led to a convergence of interest among biometrics corporations, governments, and fearful populations. In the name of "security," the state has increased its levels of population management and control, forming a "security-industrial complex" between private firms and public organizations.
[1]
E. Zureik.
Theorizing surveillance : The case of the workplace
,
2005
.
[2]
Donald P. Steury.
The Soft Cage: Surveillance in America from Slave Passes to the War on Terrorism
,
2004
.
[3]
Mariana Valverde.
Governing Security, Governing Through Security
,
2002
.
[4]
Lisa M. Austin.
Is Privacy a Casualty of the War on Terrorism
,
2001
.
[5]
Theo Vurdubakis,et al.
Chasing Shadows: Control, Virtuality and the Production of Trust
,
2001
.
[6]
Mark E. Davis.
The Flames of New York
,
2001
.
[7]
J. Morison.
Democracy, Governance and Governmentality: Civic Public Space and Constitutional Renewal in Northern Ireland”
,
2001
.
[8]
Lloyd Axworthy.
Canada and Human Security: The Need for Leadership
,
1997
.
[9]
R. D'amico.
Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison
,
1978,
Telos.