Dominant role of local dipoles in stabilizing uncompensated charges on a sulfate sequestered in a periplasmic active transport protein

Electrostatic interactions are among the key factors determining the structure and function of proteins. Here we report experimental results that illuminate the functional importance of local dipoles to these interactions. The refined 1.7‐Å X‐ray structure of the liganded form of the sulfate‐binding protein, a primary sulfate active transport receptor of Salmonella typhimurium, shows that the sulfate dianion is completely buried and bound by hydrogen bonds (mostly main‐chain peptide NH groups) and van der Waals forces. The sulfate is also closely linked, via one of these peptide units, to a His residue. It is also adjacent to the N‐termini of three α‐helices, of which the two shortest have their C‐termini “capped” by Arg residues. Site‐directed mutagenesis of the recombinant Escherichia coli sulfate receptor had no effect on sulfate‐binding activity when an Asn residue was substituted for the positively charged His and the two Arg (changed singly and together) residues. These results, combined with other observations, further solidify the idea that stabilization of uncompensated charges in a protein is a highly localized process that involves a collection of local dipoles, including those of peptide units confined to the first turns of helices. The contribution of helix macrodipoles appears insignificant.

[1]  H. Berendsen,et al.  The α-helix dipole and the properties of proteins , 1978, Nature.

[2]  G. Rose,et al.  Helix signals in proteins. , 1988, Science.

[3]  Mary L. Westbrook,et al.  Structure of the hirugen and hirulog 1 complexes of alpha-thrombin. , 1991 .

[4]  D. Blow,et al.  Structures of D-xylose isomerase from Arthrobacter strain B3728 containing the inhibitors xylitol and D-sorbitol at 2.5 A and 2.3 A resolution, respectively. , 1990, Journal of molecular biology.

[5]  B. Matthews,et al.  Analysis of the interaction between charged side chains and the alpha-helix dipole using designed thermostable mutants of phage T4 lysozyme. , 1991, Biochemistry.

[6]  F. Quiocho,et al.  Sulfate-binding protein dislikes protonated oxyacids. A molecular explanation. , 1988, Journal of molecular biology.

[7]  B. Matthews,et al.  Enhanced protein thermostability from designed mutations that interact with α-helix dipoles , 1990, Nature.

[8]  F. Quiocho,et al.  Periplasmic binding protein structure and function. Refined X-ray structures of the leucine/isoleucine/valine-binding protein and its complex with leucine. , 1989, Journal of molecular biology.

[9]  P. Karplus,et al.  Refined structure of glutathione reductase at 1.54 A resolution. , 1987, Journal of molecular biology.

[10]  F. Quiocho,et al.  High specificity of a phosphate transport protein determined by hydrogen bonds , 1990, Nature.

[11]  F A Quiocho,et al.  The 2 A resolution structure of the sulfate-binding protein involved in active transport in Salmonella typhimurium. , 1988, Journal of molecular biology.

[12]  A. Pardee Purification and properties of a sulfate-binding protein from Salmonella typhimurium. , 1966, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[13]  Wim G. J. Hol,et al.  The role of the α-helix dipole in protein function and structure , 1985 .

[14]  D. Suck,et al.  Structure refined to 2Å of a nicked DNA octanucleotide complex with DNase I , 1988, Nature.

[15]  J. Knowles,et al.  Direct evidence for the exploitation of an alpha-helix in the catalytic mechanism of triosephosphate isomerase. , 1993, Biochemistry.

[16]  F A Quiocho,et al.  Engineered interdomain disulfide in the periplasmic receptor for sulfate transport reduces flexibility. Site-directed mutagenesis and ligand-binding studies. , 1991, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[17]  H Luecke,et al.  Dipoles localized at helix termini of proteins stabilize charges. , 1991, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[18]  R. M. Burnett,et al.  Structure of the semiquinone form of flavodoxin from Clostridum MP. Extension of 1.8 A resolution and some comparisons with the oxidized state. , 1978, Journal of molecular biology.

[19]  F. Quiocho,et al.  A nonconservative serine to cysteine mutation in the sulfate-binding protein, a transport receptor. , 1991, Science.

[20]  F. Quiocho,et al.  Sulphate sequestered in the sulphate-binding protein of Salmonella typhimurium is bound solely by hydrogen bonds , 1985, Nature.

[21]  B. Lee,et al.  The interpretation of protein structures: estimation of static accessibility. , 1971, Journal of molecular biology.

[22]  Florante A. Quiocho,et al.  Stabilization of charges on isolated ionic groups sequestered in proteins by polarized peptide units , 1987, Nature.

[23]  F. Quiocho Atomic structures and function of periplasmic receptors for active transport and chemotaxis , 1991 .

[24]  Alan R. Fersht,et al.  Stabilization of protein structure by interaction of α-helix dipole with a charged side chain , 1988, Nature.