The predictive value of the maximum likelihood estimator of the number of contributors to a DNA mixture.

We propose to quantify the accuracy of a likelihood-based estimator that was recently proposed for the determination of the number of contributors to a DNA mixture, when genetic data alone is considered [H. Haned, L. Pène, J.R. Lobry, A.B. Dufour, D. Pontier, Estimating the number of contributors to forensic DNA mixtures: does maximum likelihood perform better than maximum allele count? J. Forensic Sci., in press]. Using Bayes' theorem, we derive a formula for the calculation of the predictive value (PV) of the likelihood-based estimator. The PV gives the probability that a DNA stain contains the DNAs of i people given that the maximum likelihood estimator gave an estimate of i contributors for this stain. We illustrate the PV calculations for two different types of DNA evidence: traces and body fluids. The PV varied according to the number of contributors involved in the DNA stain. Setting the maximum number of possible contributors to five, the lowest predictive values were scored for five-person mixtures with a minimum value of 0.26 for traces, but values were always above 0.94 for stains comprising one, two or three contributors, for both traces and body fluids. Values remained relatively high for four-person mixtures with a minimum value of 0.69. These findings confirm that likelihood-maximization is a powerful approach for the determination of the number of contributors to forensic DNA mixtures.

[1]  Peter M Vallone,et al.  Allele frequencies for 15 autosomal STR loci on U.S. Caucasian, African American, and Hispanic populations. , 2003, Journal of forensic sciences.

[2]  M W Perlin,et al.  Linear mixture analysis: a mathematical approach to resolving mixed DNA samples. , 2001, Journal of forensic sciences.

[3]  J Buckleton,et al.  Interpreting simple STR mixtures using allele peak areas. , 1998, Forensic science international.

[4]  Bruce Budowle,et al.  Mixture Interpretation: Defining the Relevant Features for Guidelines for the Assessment of Mixed DNA Profiles in Forensic Casework * , 2009, Journal of forensic sciences.

[5]  Peter Gill,et al.  Towards understanding the effect of uncertainty in the number of contributors to DNA stains. , 2007, Forensic science international. Genetics.

[6]  J. Buckleton,et al.  Forensic DNA Evidence Interpretation , 2004 .

[7]  Tsewei Wang,et al.  Least‐Square Deconvolution: A Framework for Interpreting Short Tandem Repeat Mixtures * , 2006, Journal of forensic sciences.

[8]  S L Lauritzen,et al.  Identification and separation of DNA mixtures using peak area information. , 2007, Forensic science international.

[9]  Carissa M Krane,et al.  Empirical analysis of the STR profiles resulting from conceptual mixtures. , 2005, Journal of forensic sciences.

[10]  Peter Gill,et al.  Low Copy Number , 2004 .

[11]  Hinda Haned,et al.  Estimating the Number of Contributors to Forensic DNA Mixtures: Does Maximum Likelihood Perform Better Than Maximum Allele Count? , 2011, Journal of forensic sciences.

[12]  J A Lambert,et al.  Taking account of peak areas when interpreting mixed DNA profiles. , 1998, Journal of forensic sciences.

[13]  Angel Carracedo,et al.  DNA mixtures in forensic casework: a 4-year retrospective study. , 2003, Forensic science international.