Telehealth videoconferencing: improving home parenteral nutrition patient care to rural areas of Ontario, Canada.

BACKGROUND Telehealth videoconferencing is a medium for health care professionals to communicate and care for patients living in remote areas. The aim of this study was to provide a survey to examine management outcome of home parenteral nutrition (HPN) patients when followed by telehealth as an alternative modality of care. METHODS Twenty-six individuals who were identified to benefit from tele-health were invited to participate in a satisfaction survey. The survey was sent to patients by postal mail. The survey also documented the incidence of line sepsis and other medical HPN complications. A cost analysis was also performed according to technology, human resources, and infrastructure. RESULTS Eighty-one telehealth videoconference sessions have been held since the inception of telehealth in 2002. Of the current telehealth patients, 13 were eligible for the survey. The satisfaction survey response rate was 11/13 (84.6%). The average line sepsis rate for the 13 patients was 0.89/1000 catheter-days. All patients were generally satisfied with videoconferencing as an alternative method of communication and care for new consultation, patient and family education, and follow-up. Travel time and costs to the patients, their families, and the health care system were significantly less. For example, a patient who resides 611 km from Toronto would cost CDN (Canadian) 724.00 dollars for flight and accommodation to meet with the team at the HPN clinic in Toronto. CONCLUSION Telehealth incorporated the cost-saving ability for HPN patients to maintain proper medical care, support, and collaboration of specialists inaccessible to their local community. Thus, its strongly positive role in HPN care deserves further consideration for a national application.

[1]  J. Picot,et al.  Telemedicine and telehealth in Canada: forty years of change in the use of information and communications technologies in a publicly administered health care system. , 1998, Telemedicine journal : the official journal of the American Telemedicine Association.

[2]  M Hoare,et al.  The use of a computerized image transfer system linking a regional neuroradiology centre to its district hospitals. , 1991, Clinical radiology.

[3]  R M Angus,et al.  The role of telecare in the management of exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in the home , 1999, Journal of telemedicine and telecare.

[4]  D. Newman,et al.  Pelvic disorders in women: chronic pelvic pain and vulvodynia. , 2000, Ostomy/wound management.

[5]  Helen C Noel,et al.  Home telehealth reduces healthcare costs. , 2004, Telemedicine journal and e-health : the official journal of the American Telemedicine Association.

[6]  D. Eedy,et al.  Diagnostic accuracy and clinical management by realtime teledermatology. Results from the Northern Ireland arms of the UK Multicentre Teledermatology Trial , 1998, Journal of telemedicine and telecare.

[7]  James Wallace,et al.  The Effect of a Teledermatology Program on Rural Referral Patterns to Dermatologists and the Management of Skin Disease , 1998, MedInfo.

[8]  B K Khandheria,et al.  Remote telemedical interpretation of neonatal echocardiograms: impact on clinical management in a primary care setting. , 1999, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[9]  J. Aalto,et al.  Effect of teleradiology on the diagnosis, treatment and prognosis of patients in a primary care centre , 2002, Journal of telemedicine and telecare.

[10]  C. Urquhart,et al.  Telemedicine versus face to face patient care: effects on professional practice and health care outcomes. , 2000, Nursing times.

[11]  E Arajärvi,et al.  Clinical effectiveness and cost analysis of patient referral by videoconferencing in orthopaedics , 2001, Journal of telemedicine and telecare.

[12]  R. Wootton,et al.  A pilot study of telemedicine for new neurological outpatient referrals , 2000, Journal of telemedicine and telecare.

[13]  R. Enns,et al.  Line sepsis in home parenteral nutrition patients: are there socioeconomic risk factors? A Canadian study. , 2005, JPEN. Journal of parenteral and enteral nutrition.

[14]  J. Wasson,et al.  Telephone care as a substitute for routine clinic follow-up. , 1992, JAMA.

[15]  S K Mun,et al.  A telemedicine consultative service for the evaluation of patients with urolithiasis. , 1998, Urology.

[16]  J Ricke,et al.  Telemedicine and its impact on cancer management. , 2000, European journal of cancer.

[17]  D. Eedy,et al.  A comparison of real‐time and store‐and‐forward teledermatology: a cost–benefit study , 2000, The British journal of dermatology.

[18]  S Tachakra,et al.  A follow-up study of remote trauma teleconsultations , 2000, Journal of telemedicine and telecare.

[19]  S. Maraka,et al.  Eighteen months' experience with remote diagnosis, management and education in congenital heart disease , 2001, Journal of telemedicine and telecare.

[20]  T J Walters,et al.  Deployment telemedicine: the Walter Reed Army Medical Center experience. , 1996, Military medicine.