Multifocal electroretinography in retinitis pigmentosa.

PURPOSE To investigate the diagnostic potential of multifocal electroretinography for the evaluation of retinal affection by retinitis pigmentosa in a clinical setting. METHODS For this prospective study, multifocal electroretinograms were obtained from 38 patients who matched the inclusion criteria of either a detectable photopic Ganzfeld response or visual fields of 10 degrees or more, and from 30 normal volunteers. Recordings were performed with the visual evoked response imaging system, using a resolution of 61 hexagonal elements within a 30-degree visual field. The results of the left eye of each patient and control subject were used for statistical evaluation by the Mann-Whitney U test. RESULTS The 38 eligible patients included those with Usher syndrome types I and II (one patient and six patients, respectively) and those with autosomal-recessive (18), X-recessive (two), and autosomal-dominant (11) forms of retinitis pigmentosa. In 27 (71%) of these 38 patients, at least a central response of the multifocal electroretinogram was detectable. Loss of multifocal electroretinogram response density in patients with retinitis pigmentosa was significant (P < .00001) in all five eccentricity groups (concentric rings), with a progression from center to periphery. Implicit time was significantly elevated in the third eccentricity group (P < .0038) and increased further toward the periphery (P < .00001). The results did not differ notably between retinitis pigmentosa subgroups. CONCLUSIONS Because the multifocal electroretinogram differentiates between affected and nonaffected retinal areas, eccentricity-dependent changes in both amplitude and implicit time were found. It can therefore add to the diagnostic information of many patients with retinitis pigmentosa.

[1]  M A Bearse,et al.  Imaging localized retinal dysfunction with the multifocal electroretinogram. , 1996, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[2]  M. Kondo,et al.  Clinical evaluation of multifocal electroretinogram. , 1995, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[3]  W Seiple,et al.  A comparison of the components of the multifocal and full-field ERGs , 1997, Visual Neuroscience.

[4]  M. Lavail,et al.  Degenerative Diseases of the Retina , 2012, Springer US.

[5]  Erich E. Sutter,et al.  The field topography of ERG components in man—I. The photopic luminance response , 1992, Vision Research.

[6]  V. Porciatti,et al.  Postreceptoral contribution to macular dysfunction in retinitis pigmentosa. , 1994, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[7]  D. Hood,et al.  Abnormalities of the retinal cone system in retinitis pigmentosa , 1996, Vision Research.

[8]  M. Jay On the heredity of retinitis pigmentosa. , 1982, The British journal of ophthalmology.

[9]  E. Berson,et al.  Focal cone electroretinograms in dominant retinitis pigmentosa with reduced penetrance. , 1978, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[10]  A T Elliott,et al.  Functional imaging of the retina using the multifocal electroretinograph: a control study. , 1996, The British journal of ophthalmology.

[11]  Erich E. Sutter,et al.  The Fast m-Transform: A Fast Computation of Cross-Correlations with Binary m-Sequences , 1991, SIAM J. Comput..

[12]  E. Zrenner,et al.  [Retinitis pigmentosa. Clinical findings, results of molecular genetic techniques and research perspectives]. , 1992, Der Ophthalmologe : Zeitschrift der Deutschen Ophthalmologischen Gesellschaft.

[13]  E. Zrenner,et al.  Klinische Elektroretinographie: Standardprotokoll und Normwerte , 1993 .

[14]  S. Archer,et al.  Neurobiology and Clinical Aspects of the Outer Retina , 1995, Springer Netherlands.

[15]  G. Trick,et al.  Improved electrode for electroretinography. , 1979, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[16]  E. Zrenner,et al.  Clinical aspects: retinitis pigmentosa , 1995 .

[17]  D. Hood,et al.  Abnormal Cone Receptor Activity in Patients with Hereditary Degeneration , 1995 .