CONTRASTIVE FOCUS, GIVENNESS AND THE UNMARKED STATUS OF "DISCOURSE-NEW"*

New evidence is provided for a grammatical principle that singles out contrastive focus (Rooth 1996; Truckenbrodt 1995) and distinguishes it from discourse-new “informational” focus. Since the prosody of discourse-given constituents may also be distinguished from discourse-new, a three-way distinction in representation is motivated. It is assumed that an F-feature marks just contrastive focus (Jackendoff 1972, Rooth 1992), and that a G-feature marks discourse-given constituents (Fery-Samek-Lodovici 2006), while discourse-new is unmarked. A crucial argument for G-marking comes from second occurrence focus (SOF) prosody, which arguably derives from a syntactic representation where SOF is both F-marked and G-marked. This analysis relies on a new G-Marking Condition specifying that a contrastive focus may be G-marked only if the focus semantic value of its scope is discourse-given, i.e., only if the contrast itself is given.

[1]  Elisabeth Selkirk,et al.  Sentence Prosody: Intonation, Stress and Phrasing , 1996 .

[2]  David I. Beaver,et al.  When Semantics Meets Phonetics: Acoustical Studies of Second-Occurrence Focus , 2007 .

[3]  Elisabeth Selkirk,et al.  Contrastive FOCUS vs. presentational focus: prosodic evidence from right node raising in English , 2002, Speech Prosody 2002.

[4]  Shalom Lappin,et al.  当代语义理论指南 = The Handbook of Contemporary Semantic Theory , 2015 .

[5]  C. Gussenhoven.  The phonology of tone and intonation , 2004 .

[6]  Elisabeth Selkirk,et al.  Bengali Intonation Revisited: An Optimality Theoretic Analysis in which FOCUS Stress Prominence Drives FOCUS Phrasing , 2008 .

[7]  Joachim Jacobs.  Fokus-Hintergrund-Gliederung und Grammatik , 1988 .

[8]  Daniel Büring.  Been There — Marked That A Theory of Second Occurrence Focus , 2006 .

[9]  K. Kiss.  Identificational focus versus information focus , 1998 .

[10]  Gary Natriello.  FOCUS , 1985, Digital-Age Innovation in Higher Education.

[11]  Roger Schwarzschild,et al.  GIVENNESS, AVOIDF AND OTHER CONSTRAINTS ON THE PLACEMENT OF ACCENT* , 1999 .

[12]  Ray Jackendoff,et al.  Semantic Interpretation in Generative Grammar , 1972 .

[13]  Angelika Kratzer,et al.  Interpreting Focus: Presupposed or Expressive Meaning , 2004 .

[14]  Manfred Krifka,et al.  A Compositional Semantics for Multiple Focus Constructions , 1991 .

[15]  Noam Chomsky,et al.  Deep structure, surface structure, and semantic interpretation , 1969 .

[16]  Caroline Vieri Fery,et al.  Focus Projection and Prosodic Prominence in Nested Foci , 2006 .

[17]  Elisabeth Selkirk,et al.  Phonology and syntax , 1984 .

[18]  Hubert Truckenbrodt,et al.  Phonological phrases : their relation to syntax, focus, and prominence , 1995 .

[19]  Manfred Krifka,et al.  Thematic Relations as Links between Nominal Reference and Temporal Constitution , 1992 .

[20]  Caroline Féry,et al.  Interpreting Second Occurrence Focus , 2005 .

[21]  Elisabeth Selkirk,et al.  Phonology and Syntax: The Relation between Sound and Structure , 1984 .

[22]  Mats Rooth.  A theory of focus interpretation , 1992, Natural Language Semantics.

[23]  E. Selkirk,et al.  Phase theory and prosodic spellout: The case of verbs , 2007 .

[24]  Mats Rooth.  On the Interface Principles for Intonational Focus , 1996 .

[25]  C. Gussenhoven.  Focus, mode and the nucleus , 1983, Journal of Linguistics.