Technological innovation capabilities in the thin film transistor-liquid crystal display industries of Japan, Korea, and Taiwan

The study described herein uses US Patent and Trademark Office data to assess variations in technological innovation capabilities, and their influence on market performance, among leading TFT-LCD producers in Japan, Korea, and Taiwan. The empirical results suggest that TFT-LCD producers in Korea and Taiwan built innovation capabilities by creating complementary knowledge for Japanese firms, whose technologies lead the way in the industry. The results also show that latecomers sought to expand production by selecting certain technological fields, but that they exploited these fields in different ways. Specifically, Korean conglomerates increased their scale of technology in order to improve their technological positions, while Taiwanese producers pursued innovations that strengthened their technological efficiency. While Japanese firms led the way in terms of both technology and market share during the 1990s, they then evolved to become merely technological leaders from 2000 onwards. However, Japanese firms have since renewed their business strategies to counter the aggressive market expansion of their competitors by strengthening the protection of their intellectual property rights through inter-keiretsu collaborations in technological niches, and by securing leadership in the market in high value-added key components in order to retain more of the profits from their own innovations. Four policy imperatives for both technology leading and latecomer countries regarding the development of sustainable industries associated with the industrial cycle and market dynamics are discussed.

[1]  Greg Linden,et al.  Flying Geese as Moving Targets: Are Korea and Taiwan Catching up with Japan in Advanced Displays? , 1998 .

[2]  E. Penrose.  The theory of the growth of the firm twenty-five years after , 1960 .

[3]  Constance E. Helfat,et al.  Strategic Renewal of Organizations , 2009, Organ. Sci..

[4]  Keun Lee,et al.  International, intra-national and inter-firm knowledge diffusion and technological catch-up: the USA, Japan, Korea and Taiwan in the memory chip industry , 2010, Technol. Anal. Strateg. Manag..

[5]  Rosemarie H. Ziedonis,et al.  The patent paradox revisited: an empirical study of patenting in the U , 2001 .

[6]  R. Rothwell.  Towards the Fifth‐generation Innovation Process , 1994 .

[7]  M. Hu,et al.  Knowledge flows and innovation capability: The patenting trajectory of Taiwan's thin film transistor-liquid crystal display industry , 2008 .

[8]  J. Hagedoorn,et al.  Measuring innovative performance: is there an advantage in using multiple indicators? , 2003 .

[9]  A. Arundel,et al.  What percentage of innovations are patented? empirical estimates for European firms , 1998 .

[10]  Show-Ling Jang,et al.  How do latecomers catch up with forerunners? Analysis of patents and patent citations in the field of flat panel display technologies , 2009, Scientometrics.

[11]  Holger Ernst,et al.  Patent portfolios for strategic R & D planning , 1998 .

[12]  B. Kogut,et al.  Knowledge of the Firm, Combinative Capabilities, and the Replication of Technology , 1992 .

[13]  Rosemarie H. Ziedonis,et al.  Reputations for Toughness in Patent Enforcement: Implications for Knowledge Spillovers via Inventor Mobility , 2007 .

[14]  Rolph E. Anderson,et al.  Multivariate Data Analysis with Readings , 1979 .

[15]  Yoshiro Miwa,et al.  The Fable of the Keiretsu , 2001 .

[16]  H. Grupp,et al.  Patent statistics in the age of globalisation: new legal procedures, new analytical methods, new economic interpretation , 1999 .

[17]  M. Dodgson.  Asia’s national innovation systems: Institutional adaptability and rigidity in the face of global innovation challenges , 2009 .

[18]  Linsu Kim,et al.  Imitation to Innovation: The Dynamics of Korea's Technological Learning , 1997 .

[19]  Clayton M. Christensen,et al.  Explaining the attacker's advantage: Technological paradigms, organizational dynamics, and the value network , 1995 .

[20]  Atul Nerkar,et al.  Old Is Gold? The Value of Temporal Exploration in the Creation of New Knowledge , 2003, Manag. Sci..

[21]  Joseph A. Castellano,et al.  Liquid Gold: The Story Of Liquid Crystal Displays and the Creation of an Industry , 2005 .

[22]  Jeffrey L. Furman,et al.  The Determinants of National Innovative Capacity , 2000 .

[23]  Flat Panel Displays , 2003 .

[24]  Scott Shane,et al.  Technological Opportunities and New Firm Creation , 2001, Manag. Sci..

[25]  A. Amsden,et al.  超越後進發展 : 台灣的産業和升級策略 = Beyond late development : Taiwan's upgrading policies , 2003 .

[26]  Constance E. Helfat,et al.  The birth of capabilities: market entry and the importance of pre-history , 2002 .

[27]  M. Hannan,et al.  Structural Inertia and Organizational Change , 1984 .

[28]  Jasjit Singh,et al.  Technological dynamism in Asia , 2003 .

[29]  Klaus Brockhoff,et al.  Instruments for patent data analyses in business firms , 1992 .

[30]  Constance E. Helfat,et al.  Product Sequencing: Co-Evolution of Knowledge, Capabilities and Products , 2000 .

[31]  Elaine Romanelli,et al.  Managing New Industry Creation: Global Knowledge Formation And Entrepreneurship In High Technology , 2003 .

[32]  David Kline,et al.  Rembrandts in the Attic: Unlocking the Hidden Value of Patents , 1999 .

[33]  John A. Mathews,et al.  Competitive Advantages of the Latecomer Firm: A Resource-Based Account of Industrial Catch-Up Strategies , 2002 .

[34]  J. Mathews.  Strategy and the Crystal Cycle , 2005 .

[35]  Curba Morris Lampert,et al.  Entrepreneurship in the large corporation: a longitudinal study of how established firms create breakthrough inventions , 2001 .

[36]  J. Sutton.  Gibrat's Legacy , 1996 .

[37]  B. Balassa.  Trade Liberalisation and “Revealed” Comparative Advantage , 1965 .

[38]  Michael Borrus,et al.  Globalization With Borders , 1997 .

[39]  Constance E. Helfat,et al.  Dynamic capabilities : understanding strategic change in organizations , 2007 .

[40]  Kathryn L. Dewenter.  The risk-sharing role of Japanese keiretsu business groups: evidence from restructuring in the 1990s , 2003 .

[41]  Fulvio Castellacci,et al.  Technological regimes and sectoral differences in productivity growth , 2007 .

[42]  M. Brewer,et al.  Intellectual Capital and the Birth of U.S. Biotechnology Enterprises , 1994 .

[43]  E. Mansfield.  Patents and Innovation: An Empirical Study , 1986 .

[44]  Michael Stolpe,et al.  Determinants of knowledge diffusion as evidenced in patent data: the case of liquid crystal display technology , 2002 .

[45]  Alok K. Chakrabarti,et al.  The dynamics of innovation : strategic and managerial implications , 2010 .

[46]  Bob Johnstone,et al.  We Were Burning: Japanese Entrepreneurs And The Forging Of The Electronic Age , 1998 .

[47]  John A. Mathews,et al.  National innovative capacity in East Asia , 2005 .

[48]  D. Teece.  Profiting from technological innovation: Implications for integration, collaboration, licensing and public policy , 1993 .

[49]  Paul Krugman,et al.  The Myth of Asia's Miracle , 1994 .

[50]  Z. Griliches.  Patent Statistics as Economic Indicators: a Survey , 1990 .

[51]  Kyoo-Ho Park,et al.  Linking the technological regime to the technological catch-up: analyzing Korea and Taiwan using the US patent data , 2006 .

[52]  L. Donaldson.  The Contingency Theory of Organizations , 2001 .

[53]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  The Emergence of Emerging Technologies , 2002 .

[54]  Tim Kastelle,et al.  The evolving nature of Taiwan's national innovation system: The case of biotechnology innovation networks , 2008 .

[55]  M. Hobday.  Innovation in East Asia , 1995 .

[56]  William J. Abernathy,et al.  Patterns of Industrial Innovation , 1978 .

[57]  D. Aaker,et al.  Strategy over the business cycle , 1989 .

[58]  K. Yamamura,et al.  Asia in Japan's embrace : building a regional production alliance , 1996 .