论文信息 - Conceptual semantics and natural semantic metalanguage theory have different goals

Conceptual semantics and natural semantic metalanguage theory have different goals

Abstract My interview with Istvan Kecskes, “On Conceptual Semantics” (OCS), offers some brief remarks on the relation of my approach to Anna Wierzbicka's theory of semantic primitives, Natural Language Metalanguage Theory (NSM). Wierzbicka's response, “Theory and empirical findings: A response to Jackendoff” (henceforth TEF) calls for some further commentary.

Ray Jackendoff

[1] M. Wertheimer. Laws of organization in perceptual forms. , 1938 .

[2] Jeffrey Gruber. Studies in lexical relations , 1965 .

[3] Leonard Talmy,et al. Force Dynamics in Language and Cognition , 1987, Cogn. Sci..

[4] R. Jackendoff. Parts and boundaries , 1991, Cognition.

[5] R. Jackendoff. The proper treatment of measuring out, telicity, and perhaps even quantification in english , 1996 .

[6] Ray Jackendoff. The natural logic of rights and obligations. , 1999 .

[7] Donald E. Brown. HUMAN UNIVERSALS , 2008, Science.

[8] D. Barash. Human Ethology , 1973 .

[9] On conceptual semantics , 2006 .